BackgroundTo the present day, literature has only discussed how to treat extensive plantar plate and collateral ligament lesions, with gross joint subluxation and obvious clinical instability. The treatment options for early stages of the disease with minor injuries and subtle instabilities have not been described. The main purpose of this prospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of the arthroscopic radiofrequency shrinkage and distal Weil osteotomy in the treatment of subtle metatarsophalangeal joint instability.MethodProspective data (clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic findings) of 19 patients, with a total of 35 slightly unstable joints, was collected. The physical examination defined the hypothesis for plantar plate lesions (grades 0 and 1), which was confirmed during the diagnostic step of the arthroscopic procedure.ResultsAmong our patients, 73 % were females and 63 % reported wearing high heels. The average age was 59 years and post-operative follow-up was 20 months. In the initial sample frame, 62 % of joints showed spread-out toes with increased interdigital spacing. The mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score rose from 53 points pre-operatively to 92 points post-operatively and a visual-analog pain scale average value of eight points pre-operatively decreased to zero post-operatively. During the pre-operative evaluation, none of the patients had stable joints and over 97 % were classified as having grade 1 instability (<50 % subluxation). After treatment, 83 % of the joints became stable (degree of instability 0) and over 97 % were congruent. All studied parameters showed statistically significant improvements in the post-operative period (p < 0.001) showing the efficiency of the treatment in pain relief, while restoring the joint stability and congruity.ConclusionArthroscopic radiofrequency shrinkage in combination with distal Weil osteotomy promotes functional improvement, pain relief, and restores the joint stability in the plantar plate lesion grades 0 and 1.
ObjectiveTo find the best clinical parameters for defining and classifying the degree of plantar plate injuries.MethodSixty-eight patients (100 metatarsophalangeal joints) were classified in accordance with the Arthroscopic Anatomical Classification for plantar plate injuries and were divided into five groups (0 to IV). Their medical files were reviewed and the incidence of each parameter for the respective group was correlated. These parameters were: use of high heels, sports, acute pain, local edema, Mulder's sign, widening of the interdigital space, pain in the head of the corresponding metatarsal, touching the ground, “drawer test”, toe grip and toe deformities (in the sagittal, coronal and transversal planes).ResultsThere were no statistically significant associations between the degree of injury and use of high-heel shoes, sports trauma, pain at the head of the metatarsal, Mulder's sign, deformity in pronation or displacement in the transversal and sagittal planes (although their combination, i.e. “cross toe”, showed a statistically significant correlation). Positive correlations with the severity of the injuries were found in relation to initial acute pain, progressive widening of the interdigital space, loss of “touching the ground”, positive results from the “drawer test” on the metatarsophalangeal joint, diminished grip strength and toe deformity in supination.ConclusionsThe “drawer test” was seen to be the more reliable and precise tool for classifying the degree of plantar plate injury, followed by “touching the ground” and rotational deformities. It is possible to improve the precision of the diagnosis and the predictions of the anatomical classification for plantar plate injuries through combining the clinical history and data from the physical examination.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.