Field trials were conducted at the National Institute of Agro-Environmental Sciences experiment station from 1995 to 1997. Each trial was carried out from mid-May to early July every year. Determining the pattern and rate of dissipation of pretilachlor and mefenacet in paddy soil at three different depths (0-1, 1-5 and 5-10 cm) and in paddy water was the primary objective of the experiments. Half-lives (DT50) of the herbicides were calculated using both the simple first order kinetics (SFOK) and the biphasic first order kinetics (BFOK). The pattern and rate of dissipation of pretilachlor in both soil and water were quite different from that of mefenacet. At the 0-1 cm soil layer (oxidative), dissipation of pretilachlor was quite rapid during the first 3 weeks but slowed down afterwards. In case of mefenacet, dissipation was a steady decline until the last sampling day. The DT50 in this layer was between 9 toll days and 7 to 10 days for mefenacet and pretilachlor, respectively. At the lower soil layers (1-5 and 5-10 cm; reductive) pretilachlor appeared to leach from the upper layer within the first two weeks and then quickly disappeared afterwards. Faster degradation of pretilachlor was noted in these reductive soil layers. On the other hand, mefenacet dissipation declined steadily at these layers. Also, leaching of mefenacet was not as evident as in pretilachlor. Mefenacet concentration in paddy water peaked over the second to third day and its dissipation was rapid until the fourth week. Dissipation pattern of pretilachlor was a steady curvilinear decline. In paddy water, DT50 was about 3. 3 to 4. 1 days for mefenacet and 3. 0 to 3. 6 days for pretilachlor.Calculating the half-life in soil (0-1 cm layer) using SFOK appears sufficient for mefenacet while a more complex model such as the BFOK describes that of pretilachlor better. The half-life and dissipation pattern of both herbicides did not vary considerably across years. There was no evidence of residue build-up due to continuous application of the herbicides in the same plots.
Experiments were conducted to determine the fate of bensulfuron-methyl (BSM) and imazosulfuron (IMS) under paddy conditions. Initially, laboratory experiments were conducted and the photolysis half-lives of the two herbicides were found to be much shorter than their hydrolysis half-lives in aqueous solutions. In the aerobic water-soil system, dissipation followed first-order kinetics with water half-lives of 9.1 and 11.0 days and soil halflives of 12.4 and 18.5 days (first phase) and 35.0 and 44.1 days (second phase) for bensulfuron-methyl and imazosulfuron, respectively. However, the anaerobic soil halflives were only 12.7 and 9.8 days for BSM and IMS, respectively. The values of K d were determined to be 16.0 and 13.8 for BSM and IMS, respectively. Subsequent field measurements for the two herbicides revealed that dissipation of both herbicides in paddy water involved biphasic first-order kinetics, with the dissipation rates in the first phase being much faster than those in the second phase. The dissipation of bensulfuron-methyl and imazosulfuron in the paddy surface soil were also followed biphasic firstorder kinetics. These results were then used as input parameters for the PCPF-1 model to simulate the fate and transport of BSM and IMS in the paddy environment (water and 1-cm surface soil layer). The measured and simulated values agreed well and the mass balance error during the simulation period was -1.2 and 2.8% of applied pesticide, respectively, for BSM and IMS.
Due to an unfortunate turn of events this article has been published with an erroneous version of Figs. 4, 5 and 6. Please find in this erratum the correct Figs. 4, 5 and 6 that should be regarded by the reader as the final version.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.