Background Background: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a common gait deficit in Parkinson's disease. The New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q) is a widely used and valid tool to quantify freezing of gait severity. However, its test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change remain unknown. Objective Objective: To determine the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the NFOG-Q. Methods Methods: Two groups of freezers, involved in 2 previous rehabilitation trials, completed the NFOG-Q at 2 time points (T1 and T2), separated by a 6-week control period without active intervention. Sample 1 (N = 57) was measured in ON and sample 2 (N = 14) in OFF. We calculated various reliability statistics for the NFOG-Q scores between T1 and T2 as well as correlation coefficients with clinical descriptors to explain the variability between time points. Results Results: In sample 1 the NFOG-Q showed modest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.68 [0.52-0.80]) without differences between T1 and T2. However, a minimal detectable change of 9.95 (7.90-12.27) points emerged for the total score (range 28 points, relative minimal detectable change of 35.5%). Sample 2 showed largely similar results. We found no associations between cognitive-related or disease severity-related outcomes and variability in NFOG-Q scores. Conclusions Conclusions: We conclude that the NFOG-Q is insufficiently reliable or responsive to detect small effect sizes, as changes need to go beyond 35% to surpass measurement error. Therefore, we warrant caution in using the NFOG-Q as a primary outcome in clinical trials. These results emphasize the need for robust and objective freezing of gait outcome measures.Freezing of gait (FOG) is a prominent and debilitating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). It affects up to 80% of PD patients during the course of the disease. 1-3 FOG is defined as the inability to progress forward stepping despite the intention to walk and reach a destination. 4 Furthermore, FOG is one of the most frequent causes of falls in PD, thus contributing to high fall rates ranging from 35% up to 90%. 1,5,6 FOG seriously impedes daily life functioning and overall quality of life. 7,8 So far, the treatment of FOG, including pharmacological, surgical, and rehabilitation interventions, is only partially effective. 4,9 Therefore, new and more personalized rehabilitation approaches are now being developed. To evaluate their effectiveness, valid and reliable assessment is necessary to document FOG severity and its progression.A recent review of Mancini and colleagues 10 highlighted that FOG assessment is hampered by several factors in clinical and laboratory settings. First, the episodic and unpredictable nature of FOG increases the likelihood of missing the event during formal or "online" performance tests of gait. Second, various "testing effects" may be at play that enhance or reduce the occurrence of FOG, such as consciously attending to walking, stepping in broad and well-lit corridors, and experiencing medication effects and...
Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) causes severe patient burden despite pharmacological management. Exercise and training are therefore advocated as important adjunct therapies. In this meta-analysis, we assess the existing evidence for such interventions to reduce FOG, and further examine which type of training helps the restoration of gait function in particular. The primary meta-analysis across 41 studies and 1838 patients revealed a favorable moderate effect size (ES = −0.37) of various training modalities for reducing subjective FOG-severity (p < 0.00001), though several interventions were not directly aimed at FOG and some included non-freezers. However, exercise and training also proved beneficial in a secondary analysis on freezers only (ES = −0.32, p = 0.007). We further revealed that dedicated training aimed at reducing FOG episodes (ES = −0.24) or ameliorating the underlying correlates of FOG (ES = −0.40) was moderately effective (p < 0.01), while generic exercises were not (ES = −0.14, p = 0.12). Relevantly, no retention effects were seen after cessation of training (ES = −0.08, p = 0.36). This review thereby supports the implementation of targeted training as a treatment for FOG with the need for long-term engagement.
Background: Dual-tasking is challenging for people with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait (PD+FOG) and can exacerbate freezing episodes and falls. Split-belt treadmill training (SBT) is a novel tool to train complex gait and may improve dual-task (DT) walking and turning. Objective: To investigate the single-session effects of SBT on DT walking and DT turning performance in PD+FOG and older adults (OA), compared to regular treadmill training. Methods: Forty-five PD+FOG and 36 OA participated in a single training session (30 min). They were randomized into one of four training groups: (A) SB75-steady belt speed ratio 0.75:1; (B) SB50-steady belt speed ratio 0.5:1; (C) SBCR-changing belt speed ratios between 0.75:1 and 0.5:1; and (D) Tied-Belt (TBT). Over-ground straight-line gait and an alternating turning in place task combined with a cognitive dual-task (DT) (auditory Stroop) were assessed pre-and post-training, and the following day (retention). Constrained longitudinal data analysis was used to investigate the training effects for all participants and for PD+FOG alone. Results: DT gait speed improved at post-training for all groups (p < 0.001). However, SBT (SB50 and SBCR) led to larger post-training improvements compared to TBT, which were still visible at retention (SB50). For mean DT turning speed and Stroop response time while walking, only SBT groups showed significant improvements at post-training or retention. DT stride length, peak DT turning speed, and Stroop performance index while walking also showed larger gains in SBT compared to TBT. Results for PD+FOG alone showed similar effects although with smaller effect sizes. Conclusions: A single session of SBT in PD+FOG and OA showed larger short-term effects on DT walking and turning compared to TBT. Cognitive DT performance was also improved in SBT, likely due to reduced cortical control of gait. These results illustrate the potential for SBT to improve DT during complex gait and possibly reduce fall risk in clinical and healthy populations.
Background Freezing of gait (FOG) is a complex symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) that is both elusive to elicit and varied in its presentation. These complexities present a challenge to measuring FOG in a sensitive and reliable way, precluding therapeutic advancement. Objective We investigated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of manual video annotations of the turning‐in‐place task and compared it to the sensor‐based FOG ratio. Methods Forty‐five optimally medicated people with PD and FOG performed rapid alternating 360° turns without and with an auditory stroop dual task, thrice over two consecutive days. The tasks were video recorded, and inertial sensors were placed on the lower back and shins. Interrater reliability between three raters, criterion validity with self‐reported FOG, and responsiveness to single‐session split‐belt treadmill (SBT) training were investigated and contrasted with the sensor‐based FOG ratio. Results Visual ratings showed excellent agreement between raters for the percentage time frozen (%TF) (ICC [intra‐class correlation coefficient] = 0.99), the median duration of a FOG episode (ICC = 0.90), and the number of FOG episodes (ICC = 0.86). Dual tasking improved the sensitivity and validity of visual FOG ratings resulting in increased FOG detection, criterion validity with self‐reported FOG ratings, and responsiveness to a short SBT intervention. The sensor‐based FOG ratio, on the contrary, showed complex FOG presentation‐contingent relationships with visual and self‐reported FOG ratings and limited responsiveness to SBT training. Conclusions Manual video annotations of FOG during dual task turning in place generate reliable, valid, and sensitive outcomes for investigating therapeutic effects on FOG. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society
To determine whether impairments across cognitive and affective domains provide additional information to sensorimotor deficits for fall prediction among various populations. Design: We pooled data from 5 studies for this observational analysis of prospective falls. Setting: Community or low-level care facility. Participants: Older people (NZ1090; 74.0AE9.4y; 579 female); 500 neurologically intact (NI) older people and 3 groups with neurologic disorders (cognitive impairment, nZ174; multiple sclerosis (MS), nZ111; Parkinson disease, nZ305). Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Sensorimotor function was assessed with the Physiological Profile Assessment, cognitive function with tests of executive function, affect with questionnaires of depression, and concern about falling with falls efficacy questionnaires. These variables were associated with fall incidence rates, obtained prospectively over 6-12 months. Results: Poorer sensorimotor function was associated with falls (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], 1.46 [1.28-1.66]). Impaired executive function was the strongest predictor of falls overall (2.91 [2.27-3.73]), followed by depressive symptoms (2. 07 [1.56-2.75]) and concern about falling (2.02 [1.61-2.55]). Associations were similar among groups, except for a weaker relationship with executive impairment in NI persons and a stronger relationship with concern about falling in persons with MS. Multivariable analyses showed that executive impairment, poorer sensorimotor
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.