According to the prevalent paradigm, the major source of carbon and energy for food webs of small forested streams in temperate regions is allochthonous material from the surrounding forest. Tropical streams have not been as well studied and there has been some speculation that their food webs are more aligned with in‐stream, algal production (autochthonous carbon). We studied food sources and consumers in four sites in a coastal tropical stream with gradients of 36–254 m elevation, 8–73% canopy cover and 11.9–7.1 km2 watershed area, with the expectation that the food web would incorporate proportionately more allochthonous material as shading increased with smaller stream size. We analysed stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen in basal resources and fauna and compared the values of consumers to the potential sources using a mixing model to estimate the proportion of allochthonous and autochthonous material in their diets. The predominant source of carbon in the food web was from algal production at all sites. There was no distinct increase in the proportion of allochthonous contribution to the diets of primary consumers and predators with increasing shading, and they did not generally change their diet with shading. Thus the food web was based more on autochthonous resources than would be expected from the paradigm for temperate streams.
Indirect foodweb interactions often determine the dynamics of aquatic ecosystems. Predators may reduce the activity of herbivores, which, in turn, may cause basal resources to increase. We studied the patterns of distribution of periphyton (organic and inorganic mass and chlorophyll) on rocks in pools in two Atlantic rainforest coastal streams that varied with respect to the presence or absence of fish. A steep waterfall apparently prevented most fish species from colonising the upper parts of one stream; the other stream was apparently naturally without most species of fish. When fish were present, atyid shrimps and baetid mayflies were less abundant compared with parts of the streams without fish. Concomitant with this, the quantity of periphyton organic and inorganic masses was much greater in the presence of fish. Previous experiments showed that atyid shrimps (Potimirim glabra) and baetid mayflies could reduce the quantity of periphyton by grazing and bioturbation. We deduce that fish inhibit the grazing and bioturbing activities of Potimirim and baetid mayflies, which resulted in larger quantities of inorganic and organic mass of periphyton in parts of streams with fish. Cascading interactions may be common in Atlantic coastal forest streams.
Periphyton distribution is affected by various physical, chemical and biological factors at different scales. In the present study, a cheap and rapid method of measurement was used to obtain the many samples necessary for spatial analysis of periphyton along an altitudinal gradient in a low-order stream in south-east Brazilian Atlantic rain-forest. Fluorescence and turbidity were measured using a hand-held fluorometer and calibrated to the chlorophyll and dry mass of periphyton. Periphyton on the horizontal and vertical surfaces of different boulders was examined and shading and water current were measured as covariables. The three upstream sites with higher abundances of potentially grazing and bioturbing shrimps and mayflies had significantly less periphyton dry mass than the three downstream sites. Chlorophyll was positively related to water current, but not to shading. Variabilities in the dry mass and chlorophyll among boulders within sites were not associated with the distribution of shrimps and mayflies. The in vivo measurement was cheap, rapid, sensitive and reasonably precise compared with standard methods. The necessary sacrifice of detail of pigments (different chlorophylls and pheophytin) and dry mass (organic and inorganic constituents) and probably precision was compensated for by the insights gained from the ability to obtain a large number of samples in a hierarchical design.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.