The standard of nursing care documentation is not on a par with that in developed countries, partly owing to a lack of guidelines, as well as a persistent shortage of nurses and the limited use of nursing care records. It is recommended that nursing stakeholders use a multidisciplinary approach to develop policies/guidelines on nursing care documentation and provide training opportunities for nurses on effective documentation.

Back Background groundPost exposure prophylaxis remains the single most important means of decreasing HIV infection upon occupational exposure. It offers over 80% protection against HIV sero-conversion when initiated within 72 hours of exposure and if the treatment regimen followed diligently for 28 days. This study assessed the level of knowledge and usage of post exposure prophylaxis among healthcare workers in the Eastern Regional Hospital, Koforidua, Ghana where HIV prevalence is high. Methods MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 185 HealthCare Workers (HCWs) between May and July 2016. Data was collected using self-administered structured questionnaires and analyzed with Stata-13. Bivariate associations were tested using chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Multivariate analysis was conducted with logistic regression. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. R Results esultsOut of the 185 HCW interviewed, 96.8% considered themselves at risk of occupational exposure with 83.2% reporting occupational exposure within the last 12 months. Nearly all participants (97.3%) knew about the existence of post exposure prophylaxis (PEP). A majority (90.8%) acknowledged the effectiveness of PEP in preventing HIV infection. About 89% knew that the exposed area should be washed with soap and water or flushed with copious amounts of water and 65.4% knew whom to contact after exposure. Although about 93% knew PEP should be started within 72 hours of exposure, only 38.9% knew the duration of treatment to be four weeks. The accurate drug regime following a high-risk needle stick injury was known by 25.1% while the proportion of needle stick injuries could result in HIV transmission was unknown by 65.9%. Although 51.9% were eligible to take PEP, only 33.8% reported having received PEP.

Back Background ground Post exposure prophylaxis remains the single most important means of decreasing HIV infection upon occupational exposure. It offers over 80% protection against HIV sero-conversion when initiated within 72 hours of exposure and if the treatment regimen followed diligently for 28 days. This study assessed the level of knowledge and usage of post exposure prophylaxis among healthcare workers in the Eastern Regional Hospital, Koforidua, Ghana where HIV prevalence is high. Methods Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 185 HealthCare Workers (HCWs) between May and July 2016. Data was collected using self-administered structured questionnaires and analyzed with Stata-13. Bivariate associations were tested using chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Multivariate analysis was conducted with logistic regression. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. R Results esults Out of the 185 HCW interviewed, 96.8% considered themselves at risk of occupational exposure with 83.2% reporting occupational exposure within the last 12 months. Nearly all participants (97.3%) knew about the existence of post exposure prophylaxis (PEP). A majority (90.8%) acknowledged the effectiveness of PEP in preventing HIV infection. About 89% knew that the exposed area should be washed with soap and water or flushed with copious amounts of water and 65.4% knew whom to contact after exposure. Although about 93% knew PEP should be started within 72 hours of exposure, only 38.9% knew the duration of treatment to be four weeks. The accurate drug regime following a high-risk needle stick injury was known by 25.1% while the proportion of needle stick injuries could result in HIV transmission was unknown by 65.9%. Although 51.9% were eligible to take PEP, only 33.8% reported having received PEP.