BackgroundPrevious observational studies have showed that certain psychiatric disorders may be linked to breast cancer risk, there is, however, little understanding of relationships between mental disorders and a variety of breast diseases. This study aims to investigate if mental disorders influence the risks of overall breast cancer, the two subtypes of breast cancer (ER+ and ER-), breast benign tumors and breast inflammatory diseases.MethodsDuring our research, genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for seven psychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa) from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) and the UK Biobank were selected, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) significantly linked to these mental disorders were identified as instrumental variables. GWAS data for breast diseases came from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) as well as the FinnGen consortium. We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses and multivariable MR analyses to assess these SNPs’ effects on various breast diseases. Both heterogeneity and pleiotropy were evaluated by sensitivity analyses.ResultsWhen the GWAS data of psychiatric disorders were derived from the PGC, our research found that schizophrenia significantly increased the risks of overall breast cancer (two-sample MR: OR 1.05, 95%CI [1.03-1.07], p = 3.84 × 10−6; multivariable MR: OR 1.06, 95%CI [1.04-1.09], p = 2.34 × 10−6), ER+ (OR 1.05, 95%CI [1.02-1.07], p = 5.94 × 10−5) and ER- (two-sample MR: OR 1.04, 95%CI [1.01-1.07], p = 0.006; multivariable MR: OR 1.06, 95%CI [1.02-1.10], p = 0.001) breast cancer. Nevertheless, major depressive disorder only showed significant positive association with overall breast cancer (OR 1.12, 95%CI [1.04-1.20], p = 0.003) according to the two-sample MR analysis, but not in the multivariable MR analysis. In regards to the remainder of the mental illnesses and breast diseases, there were no significant correlations. While as for the data from the UK Biobank, schizophrenia did not significantly increase the risk of breast cancer.ConclusionsThe correlation between schizophrenia and breast cancer found in this study may be false positive results caused by underlying horizontal pleiotropy, rather than a true cause-and-effect relationship. More prospective studies are still needed to be carried out to determine the definitive links between mental illnesses and breast diseases.

Background Breast cancer presents as one of the top health threats to women around the world. Myeloid cells are the most abundant cells and the major immune coordinator in breast cancer tumor microenvironment (TME), target therapies that harness the anti-tumor potential of myeloid cells are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. However, the landscape and dynamic transition of myeloid cells in breast cancer TME are still largely unknown. Methods Myeloid cells were characterized in the single-cell data and extracted with a deconvolution algorithm to be assessed in bulk-sequencing data. We used the Shannon index to describe the diversity of infiltrating myeloid cells. A 5-gene surrogate scoring system was then constructed and evaluated to infer the myeloid cell diversity in a clinically feasible manner. Results We dissected the breast cancer infiltrating myeloid cells into 15 subgroups including macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), and monocytes. Mac_CCL4 had the highest angiogenic activity, Mac_APOE and Mac_CXCL10 were highly active in cytokine secretion, and the DCs had upregulated antigen presentation pathways. The infiltrating myeloid diversity was calculated in the deconvoluted bulk-sequencing data, and we found that higher myeloid diversity was robustly associated with more favorable clinical outcomes, higher neoadjuvant therapy responses, and a higher rate of somatic mutations. We then used machine learning methods to perform feature selection and reduction, which generated a clinical-friendly scoring system consisting of 5 genes (C3, CD27, GFPT2, GMFG, and HLA-DPB1) that could be used to predict clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients. Conclusions Our study explored the heterogeneity and plasticity of breast cancer infiltrating myeloid cells. By using a novel combination of bioinformatic approaches, we proposed the myeloid diversity index as a new prognostic metric and constructed a clinically practical scoring system to guide future patient evaluation and risk stratification. Graphical Abstract

Background Due to the rarity of PBL and the lack of large-scale studies, the prognostic value of IPI in PBL was controversial. Especially in the rituximab era, the ability of IPI to stratify prognosis in patients receiving immunochemotherapy was severely reduced. Then revised IPI (R-IPI) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI (NCCN-IPI) were introduced. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of IPI and the other IPIs in patients with PBL in a Chinese population. Methods We performed a multicenter retrospective study of 71 patients with PBL from 3 institutions in China. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests were used for the survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the prognostic significance of IPI scores, R-IPI scores, and NCCN-IPI scores. Results The median follow-up was 4.7 years (0.7–21.8 years). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 90.2% and 96.3%. In the multivariate analysis, only IPI scores and radiotherapy were significantly associated with OS and PFS (P < 0.05). Applying the R-IPI in our patient cohort indicates a significant difference in PFS between the two groups of R-IPI (P = 0.034) but not for OS (P = 0.072). And the NCCN-IPI was prognostic for OS (P = 0.025) but not for PFS (P = 0.066). Subgroup analyses of IPI showed that survival analysis of IPI scores for the PFS and OS of patients using rituximab were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Conclusions Our study confirms the prognostic value of IPI in patients with PBL, but the predictive value of IPI proved to be relatively low with the addition of the rituximab. The R-IPI and NCCN-IPI can accurately assess the high and low-risk groups of PBL patients but were insufficient to evaluate the intermediate risk group.

Introduction: Serving as the key intermediate in metabolic pathways, acyl-CoA is coordinated by various acyl-CoA binding domain containing proteins (ACBDs). ACBD6 is a crucial member of the ACBD family, and previous studies have indicated its potential in tumorigenesis and cancer progress. However, the clinical relevance of ACBD6 in breast cancer is still elusive. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between ACBD6 expression and other clinicopathological features of breast cancer, furtherly explore its specific role in metabolism and prognostic value. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients and used immunohistochemical staining to determine their ACBD6 statuses. Web platforms are also used to analyze ACBD6. Results: Results showed that patients with high ACBD6 expression tend to be older, more likely to be progesterone receptor negative, and more often classified into triple-negative breast cancer. Web platforms such as LinkedOmics and BCIP uniformly confirm that ACBD6 level is elevated in breast cancerous tissues. Higher expression of ACBD6 is associated with more aggressive clinicopathological features, as well as worse prognosis. Conclusions: ACBD6 assists with N-myristoyltransferase enzymes to functionally support glycine myristoylation, and interacts with lysophospholipid-acyltransferase enzymes, protecting the integrity of membrane lipid bilayer from the destructive nature of acyl-CoA. Also, ACBD6 could influence hematopoiesis and vascular endothelium development. Despite precise cognition remains scarce, ACBD6 multi-functionally works in the occurrence and metabolic reprogramming of breast cancer. Further researches are deserved to elucidate the biological mechanisms, prognostic and therapeutic value of ACBD6.