About one in seven elderly patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis (AS) also have ATTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (AC-TTR). The reasons for this close association are not fully known, but the two entities are not only related by common epidemiology. For example, it is possible to hypothesize that an amyloidotic infiltration of the aortic valve, even partial, can act as a trigger for the development of endothelial damage and subsequent calcification. Another hypothesis is the increased myocardial strain induced by AS may locally favour the process of amyloidogenesis and tissue infiltration. In a patient with AS, the coexistence of AC-TTR can be suspected by careful analysis of the echocardiogram and the ECG, especially if a clinical history of carpal tunnel syndrome coexists. Bone tracer scintigraphy allows a diagnosis of certainty. Recently, several studies have evaluated the prognostic implications of the coexistence of the two entities in candidates for percutaneous aortic valve replacement, showing how amyloidosis would not significantly impact the results of the procedure, but would only be associated with a greater risk of distant heart failure. In patients with AS associated with AC-TTR, valve replacement should not be ruled out in the presence of the usual clinical-haemodynamic indications.
The therapy of transthyretin (TTR)-related cardiac amyloidosis consists, on the one hand, of the prevention and management of complications (supportive therapy) and on the other of treatments aimed at interrupting or slowing down the production and deposition of fibrils (disease-modifying therapy). This definition includes drugs that act on different phases of amyloidogenesis: (i) silencing of the gene encoding TTR (small interfering RNA: patisiran, vutrisiran; antisense oligonucleotides: inotersen, eplontersen; new CRISPR Cas-9 drug technology for editing in vivo DNA); (ii) stabilization of circulating TTR to inhibit its dissociation and subsequent assembly of the resulting monomers in amyloidotic fibrils (tafamidis, acoramidis, and tolcapone); (iii) destruction and re-absorption of already formed amyloid tissue deposits. Drugs related to the latter strategy (antibodies) are still the subject of Phase 1 or 2 studies.
BackgroundCardiac amyloidosis (CA) is primarily a restrictive cardiomyopathy in which the impairment of diastolic function is dominant. Despite this, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may be depressed in the late stage of the disease, but it poorly predicts prognosis in the earlier phases and does not represent well the pathophysiology of CA. Many echocardiographic parameters resulted important diagnostic and prognostic tools in patients with CA. Stroke volume (SV) and myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) may be obtained both with echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (MRI). They reflect many factors intrinsically related to the pathophysiology of CA and are therefore potentially associated with symptoms and prognosis in CA.ObjectivesTo collect and summarize the current evidence on SV and MCF and their clinical and prognostic role in transthyretin (TTR-CA).Methods and resultsWe performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched the literature database for studies focusing on SV and MCF in patients with TTR-CA. We analysed the following databases: PUBMED, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science database. Fourteen studies were included in the review. Both SV and MCF have important prognostic implications and are related to mortality. Furthermore, SV is more related to symptoms than LVEF and predicts tolerability of beta-blocker therapy in TTR-CA. Finally, SV showed to be an excellent measure to suggest the presence of TTR-CA in patients with severe aortic stenosis.ConclusionStroke volume and MCF are very informative parameters that should be routinely assessed during the standard echocardiographic examination of all patients with TTR-CA. They carry a prognostic role while being associated with patients’ symptoms.Systematic review registrationhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ME7DS.
Background The clinical value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is uncertain. Due to the growing prevalence of the disease and the current availability of disease‐modifying drugs, prognostic stratification is becoming fundamental to optimizing the cost‐effectiveness of treatment, patient phenotyping, follow‐up, and management. Peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope are currently the most studied CPET variables in clinical settings, and both demonstrate substantial, independent prognostic value in several cardiovascular diseases. We aim to study the association of peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope with prognosis in patients with CA. Methods and results We performed a systematic review and searched for clinical studies performing CPET for prognostication in patients with transthyretin‐CA and light‐chain‐CA. Studies reporting hazard ratio (HR) for mortality and peak VO2 or VE/VCO2 slope were further selected for quantitative analysis. HRs were pooled using a random‐effect model. Five studies were selected for qualitative and three for quantitative analysis. A total of 233 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Mean peak VO2 resulted consistently depressed, and VE/VCO2 slope was increased. Our pooled analysis showed peak VO2 (pooled HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84–0.94) and VE/VCO2 slope (pooled HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07) were significantly associated with the risk of death in CA patients, with no significant statistical heterogeneity for both analyses. Conclusions CPET is a valuable tool for prognostic stratification in CA, identifying patients at increased risk of death. Large prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm this exploratory finding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.