ObjectiveMitral valve prolapse (MVP) has been associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA), but little is known about VA in patients with significant primary mitral regurgitation (MR). Our aim was to describe the prevalence of symptomatic VA in patients with MVP (fibro-elastic deficiency or Barlow’s disease) referred for mitral valve (MV) surgery because of moderate-to-severe MR, and to identify clinical, electrocardiographic, standard and advanced echocardiographic parameters associated with VA.Methods610 consecutive patients (64±12 years, 36% female) were included. Symptomatic VA was defined as symptomatic and frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVC, Lown grade ≥2), non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) without ischaemic aetiology.ResultsA total of 67 (11%) patients showed symptomatic VA, of which 3 (4%) had VF, 3 (4%) sustained VT, 27 (40%) non-sustained VT and 34 (51%) frequent PVCs. Patients with VA were significantly younger, more often female and showed T-wave inversions; furthermore, they showed significant MV morphofunctional abnormalities, such as mitral annular disjunction (39% vs 20%, p<0.001), and dilatation (annular diameter 37±5 mm vs 33±6 mm, p<0.001), lower global longitudinal strain (GLS 20.9±3.1% vs 22.0±3.6%, p=0.032) and prolonged mechanical dispersion (45±12 ms vs 38±14 ms, p=0.003) as compared with patients without VA. Female sex, increased MV annular diameter, lower GLS and prolonged mechanical dispersion were identified as independent associates of symptomatic VA.ConclusionIn patients with MVP with moderate-to-severe MR, symptomatic VA are relatively frequent and associated with significant MV annular abnormalities, subtle left ventricular function impairment and heterogeneous contraction. Assessment of these parameters might help decision-making over further diagnostic analyses and improve risk-stratification.
Question addressedEchocardiography is not currently considered as providing sufficient prognostic information to serve as an integral part of treatment goals in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We tested the hypothesis that incorporation of multiple parameters reflecting right heart function would improve the prognostic value of this imaging modality.Methods and Main ResultsWe pooled individual patient data from a total of 517 patients (mean age 52±15 years, 64.8% females) included in seven observational studies conducted at five European and United States academic centers. Patients were subdivided into three groups representing progressive degrees of RV dysfunction based on a combination of echocardiographic measurements: group 1 (low-risk): normal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and non-significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (n=129); group 2 (intermediate-risk): normal TAPSE and significant TR or impaired TAPSE and non-dilated inferior vena cava (IVC) (n=256); group 3 (high-risk): impaired TAPSE and dilated IVC (n=132). The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 82% in group 1, 63% in group 2, and 43% in group 3. Low-risk patients had better survival rates than intermediate-risk patients (log-rank χ2: 12.25 p<0.001) and intermediate-risk patients had better survival rates than high-risk patients (log-rank χ2: 26.25 p<0.001). Inclusion of other parameters such as right atrial area and pericardial effusion did not provide added prognostic value.Answer to the questionThe proposed echocardiographic approach integrating the evaluation of TAPSE, TR grade and IVC is effective in stratifying the risk for all-cause mortality in PAH patients, outperforming the prognostic parameters suggested by current guidelines.
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Aims Right ventricular myocardial work (RVMW) is a novel method for non-invasive assessment of right ventricular (RV) function utilizing RV pressure–strain loops. This study aimed to explore the relationship between RVMW and invasive indices of right heart catheterization (RHC) in a cohort of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), and to compare values of RVMW with those of a group of patients without cardiovascular disease. Methods and results Non-invasive analysis of RVMW was performed in 22 HFrEF patients [median age 63 (59–67) years] who underwent echocardiography and invasive RHC within 48 h. Conventional RV functional measurements, RV global constructive work (RVGCW), RV global work index (RVGWI), RV global wasted work (RVGWW), and RV global work efficiency (RVGWE) were analysed and compared with invasively measured stroke volume and stroke volume index. Non-invasive analysis of RVMW was also performed in 22 patients without cardiovascular disease to allow for comparison between groups. None of the conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV systolic function were significantly correlated with stroke volume or stroke volume index. In contrast, one of the novel indices derived non-invasively by pressure–strain loops, RVGCW, demonstrated a moderate correlation with invasively measured stroke volume and stroke volume index (r = 0.63, P = 0.002 and r = 0.59, P = 0.004, respectively). RVGWI, RVGCW, and RVGWE were significantly lower in patients with HFrEF compared to a healthy cohort, while values of RVGWW were significantly higher. Conclusion RVGCW is a novel parameter that provides an integrative analysis of RV systolic function and correlates more closely with invasively measured stroke volume and stroke volume index than other standard echocardiographic parameters.
Background: Left ventricular myocardial work (LVMW) is a novel method to assess left ventricular (LV) function using pressure-strain loops that takes into consideration LV afterload. The estimation of LV afterload in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may be challenging, and no study so far has investigated LVMW in this setting. The aim of this study was to develop a method to calculate LVMW in patients with severe AS and to analyze its relationship with heart failure symptoms.Methods: Indices of LVMW were calculated in 120 patients with severe AS who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement and invasive LV and aortic pressure measurements. LV systolic pressure was also derived by adding the mean aortic valve gradient to the aortic systolic pressure. LV global longitudinal strain and echocardiography-derived LV systolic pressure were then incorporated to construct pressure-strain loops of the left ventricle.Results: An excellent correlation was observed between LVMW indices calculated using the invasive and echocardiography-derived LV systolic pressure. Patients in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (n = 97 [73%]) had lower LV global longitudinal strain, LV global work index, LV global constructive work, and right ventricular free wall strain compared with those in New York Heart Association functional class I or II. In contrast to LV global longitudinal strain, LV global work index (odds ratio per 100 mm Hg% increase, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98; P = .012) and LV global constructive work showed independent associations with New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure symptoms. Conclusions:The calculation of echocardiography-based LVMW indices is feasible in patients with severe AS. In particular, LV global work index and global constructive work showed independent associations with heart failure symptoms and may provide additional information on myocardial remodeling and function in patients with severe AS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.