Salah satu alternatif bahan yang digunakan sebagai gigi tiruan cekat adalah fiber reinforced composite (FRC) yaitu kombinasi fiber dan matriks resin. Fiber yang sering digunakan di kedokteran gigi adalah e-glass fiber. Kekurangan e-glass fiber dental adalah modulus tensile rendah, self abrasive, ketahanan fatique rendah, dan harga relatif mahal. E-glass fiber non-dental dipilih sebagai alternatif karena kompisisinya hampir sama dengan e-glass fiber dental. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hasil uji perbedaan kekerasan fiber reinforced composite antara e-glass fiber dental dan e-glass fiber non-dental. Metode: Jenis penelitian eksperimental murni. Sampel berbentuk silindris dengan diameter 4 mm dan tinggi 2 mm, terdiri dari 3 kelompok; kelompok e-glass fiber dental, e-glass fiber nondental, dan kelompok tanpa fiber sebagai kontrol negatif; masing-masing terdiri dari 4 sampel. Kelompok e-glass fiber non-dental dan e-glass fiber dental diberi silane. Uji kekerasan dilakukan dengan Vickers Hardness Testing Machine dengan beban 294,2 N selama 10-15 detik. Analisa statistik menggunakan independent sample t-test. Hasil: Nilai kekerasan e-glass fiber dental 60,83 VHN, e-glass non-dental 53,56 VHN, dan kelompok tanpa fiber 48,23 VHN. Nilai signifikasi yang diperoleh adalah p = 0,000; di mana p < 0,05, artinya terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara kekerasan FRC dengan e-glass fiber dental dan FRC dengan e-glass fiber non-dental. Simpulan: Terdapat perbedaan kekerasan antara FRC dengan e-glass fiber dental dan non-dental, di mana kekerasan FRC dengan e-glass fiber dental lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan FRC dengan e-glass fiber non-dental. Kata kunci: Kekerasan, fiber reinforced composite, glass fiber dental, glass fiber non-dental Hardness test of dental and non-dental e-glass fiber reinforced composite ABSTRACT Introduction: One alternative material can be used as fixed denture is fiber reinforced composite (FRC), from a combination of fiber and resin matrix. Fiber often used in dentistry is e-glass fiber. The disadvantages of dental e-glass fiber are low tensile modulus, self abrasive, low resistance to fatique, and relatively high prices. Non-dental e-glass fiber was chosen as an alternative because the composition is almost the same as dental e-glass fiber. The purpose of this study was to determine the hardness difference test result between dental and non-dental glass fiber reinforced composite. Methods: This research was true experimental research. The samples were cylindrical with a diameter of 4 mm and the height of 2 mm, consisted of 3 groups; the dental e-glass fiber group, non-dental e-glass fiber group, and non-fiber group as negative controls; each consisted of 4 samples. The group of non-dental e-glass fiber and dental e-glass fiber was given silane. The hardness test was carried out with the Vickers Hardness Testing Machine with a load of 294.2 N for 10-15 seconds. Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample t-test. Results: The hardness value of dental e-glass fiber reinforced c...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.