Background and objectives The calcimimetic cinacalcet reduced the risk of death or cardiovascular (CV) events in older, but not younger, patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) who were receiving hemodialysis. To determine whether the lower risk in younger patients might be due to lower baseline CV risk and more frequent use of cointerventions that reduce parathyroid hormone (kidney transplantation, parathyroidectomy, and commercial cinacalcet use), this study examined the effects of cinacalcet in older ($65 years, n=1005) and younger (,65 years, n=2878) patients.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Evaluation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) was a global, multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled trial in 3883 prevalent patients on hemodialysis, whose outcomes included death, major CV events, and development of severe unremitting HPT. The age subgroup analysis was prespecified.Results Older patients had higher baseline prevalence of diabetes mellitus and CV comorbidity. Annualized rates of kidney transplantation and parathyroidectomy were .3-fold higher in younger relative to older patients and were more frequent in patients randomized to placebo. In older patients, the adjusted relative hazard (95% confidence interval) for the primary composite (CV) end point (cinacalcet versus placebo) was 0.70 (0.60 to 0.81); in younger patients, the relative hazard was 0.97 (0.86 to 1.09). Corresponding adjusted relative hazards for mortality were 0.68 (0.51 to 0.81) and 0.99 (0.86 to 1.13). Reduction in the risk of severe unremitting HPT was similar in both groups. ConclusionsIn the EVOLVE trial, cinacalcet decreased the risk of death and of major CV events in older, but not younger, patients with moderate to severe HPT who were receiving hemodialysis. Effect modification by age may be partly explained by differences in underlying CV risk and differential application of cointerventions that reduce parathyroid hormone.

To determine the mortality of patients with severe COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) in relation to age, gender, co-morbidities, ventilatory status, and length of stay (LOS). Methods This was a cross-sectional study based on data retrieved for 204 patients admitted to the ICU of Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from April to August 2020. Study variables were age, gender, comorbid conditions, ventilatory status, and length of stay (LOS). The data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The independent t-test and the chi-square test were used to compare the means and frequencies of variables. Multivariate regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of mortality. Results The overall mortality was 77%. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was administered to 61.8% of patients. Mortality was higher for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (93.6% vs 66.7%, p<0.001) and for over 60 years (87.3% vs 72.3%, p=0.019). Mortality without co-morbidities was 75.2%. Comparative mortality rates for at least one co-morbidity (79.7%), diabetes mellitus (80.0%), hypertension (100%), diabetes mellitus and hypertension both (87.1%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (75%) were insignificant. The LOS for survivors was longer (8.9±8.9 versus 5.4±5.2 days, p=0.017). The LOS < 24h was associated with higher mortality (85.9% vs 72.9%, p=0.040). On multivariable regression, the likelihood of mortality was high for IMV (7.330, 95% CI 2.667-20.143, p<0.001) and elderly (>60 years) patients (2.607, 95%CI 1.063-6.394, p=0.036). Mortality decreased with LOS longer than 24h (0.412, 95%CI 0.173-0.982, p=0.045). Comorbidities did not have any effect on mortality. Conclusions Age more than 60 years and IMV were independent risk factors for higher mortality. Longer ICU stay, specifically more than 24 hours, was associated with lower mortality but LOS less than 24 hours might not have a causal relationship with mortality. The odds of survival were not affected by co-morbidities.

Objectives: To determine the association between ABO/Rh-D blood types and susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in Pakistan. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 1935 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were included using consecutive sampling. Age and gender-matched sample of 1935 blood donors was used as a comparison group. Chi-square test and binary logistic regression were used for inferential statistics. Results: Significantly higher proportion of blood type-B was observed in COVID-19 group (35.9% vs 31.9%, p=0.009). Blood type-AB was found more frequently (14.2% vs 11.8%, p=0.03) in the comparison group. The Rh-D Positive blood types were 93.3% in COVID-19 group and 94.9% in comparison group (p=0.03). The odds of blood type-B, AB and Rh-D positive to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 were 1.195 (95% CI 1.04 – 1.36, p=0.009), 0.80 (95% CI 0.66 – 0.97, p=0.03) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.57- 0.98, p = 0.03), respectively. Blood types A and O did not have significant association with SARS-CoV-2 PCR result (p = 0.22 and 0.88, respectively). Conclusions: There is significant association between blood types B & AB and susceptibility to COVID-19. There is no association between blood types A and O with COVID-19. Rh- D positive blood types are less susceptible to COVID-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3655 How to cite this:Rahim F, Amin S, Bahadur S, Noor M, Mahmood A, Gul H. ABO / Rh-D Blood types and susceptibility to Corona Virus Disease-19 in Peshawar, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):4-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.3655 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Infectious agents have been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders for decades. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is no exception. This became evident as the pandemic evolved. Once considered a respiratory pathogen only, SARS-CoV-2 is now linked to a variety of autoimmune rheumatic disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, reactive arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, vasculitis, and inflammatory myopathy. Although the exact cause for muscle injury in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not established, autoimmune inflammatory damage is the most accepted mechanism. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 can cause direct muscle damage and indirectly through a cytokine storm. Inflammatory polymyositis in relation to COVID-19 has seldom been reported in developing countries.Here, we report a unique case of inflammatory polymyositis in a 52-year-old lady. The patient presented with muscle weakness, generalized body aches, and fatigue occurring four months after recovering from mild COVID-19. She had muscle weakness of Medical Research Council (MRC) grade 3/5 involving the shoulders and pelvic girdle with elevated muscle enzymes. Electromyography revealed an active irritable myopathic process consistent with inflammatory polymyositis. She underwent magnetic resonance imagingguided muscle biopsy from the right thigh which revealed findings consistent with inflammatory myopathy. She was offered prednisolone and azathioprine. After four weeks of treatment, she had a remarkable improvement in her muscle strength to MRC grade 5/5.

Hypoxemic respiratory failure is the most frequent complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is no longer considered a standalone respiratory infection. It can involve other organs, including kidneys by direct invasion or indirectly through immune activation, cytokine storm, microthrombi and hemodynamic instability. Multiorgan involvement carries a worse prognosis in COVID-19. Tubulopathy is the most frequently reported renal pathology, followed by glomerulopathies. Among the glomerulopathies, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy is less often reported. Differentiating tubulopathy from glomerulopathy is important from the management and prognostic point of view. Laboratory investigations, including urine microscopy, cannot predict glomerulopathy as a cause of renal involvement. Therefore, it is important to proceed with renal biopsy early to make a definite diagnosis. We report a case of a 33-year-old male who presented three weeks after recovery from COVID-19 with proteinuric acute kidney injury. Subsequent renal biopsy revealed IgA nephropathy.