Background: Acute gastroenteritis is a major cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality, accounting for 15% of all childhood deaths worldwide. In developing countries, diarrheal diseases continue to be a major public health burden. Evidence from developed countries suggests that intake of lactose-free milk during diarrheal episodes may reduce the duration of the illness in pediatric inpatients. It is unknown whether lactose-free milk reduces the severity or duration of acute gastroenteritis in infants treated in outpatient settings in developing countries where diarrhea is more severe, and results in higher morbidities and mortalities. We hypothesize that lactose-free milk intake during acute gastroenteritis would significantly decrease the duration and severity of diarrhea in infants presenting to the Emergency Department (ED), as compared with lactose-containing milk. Methods/Design: An open-label randomized clinical trial. Study population: 40 infants with acute gastroenteritis, age between 2 and 12 months, presenting to the ED, will be randomized to control or intervention group. Intervention: Lactose-free milk, whereas the control group will continue on regular infant formula for a total of 7 days. Infants will be followed up for 7 days. Outcome measures: Diarrhea duration, weight loss, illness clinic visits, hospitalization rate, parental satisfaction, and time to symptom resolution. Statistical analysis: Descriptive and regression analysis will be conducted under the intention-to-treat basis by using SPSS version 21. Discussion: Acute gastroenteritis is a public health burden for developing countries, with a significant impact on infant morbidity and mortality. Provision of infant formula that may reduce the duration and severity of diarrhea can decrease this burden in countries with limited healthcare resources, like Lebanon. The findings from this study are anticipated to provide evidence-based dietary recommendations for ambulatory infants with acute diarrhea in developing countries.
Background. Aortic valve stenosis accounts for 3–6% of congenital heart disease. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is the preferred therapeutic intervention in many centers. However, most of the reported data are from developed countries. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective single-center study involving consecutive eligible neonates and infants with congenital aortic stenosis admitted for percutaneous BAV between January 2005 and January 2016 to our tertiary center. We evaluated the short- and mid-term outcomes associated with the use of BAV as a treatment for congenital aortic stenosis (CAS) at a tertiary center in a developing country. Similarly, we compared these outcomes to those reported in developed countries. Results. During the study period, a total of thirty patients, newborns (n = 15) and infants/children (n = 15), underwent BAV. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction was present in 56% of the patients. Isolated AS was present in 19 patients (63%). Associated anomalies were present in 11 patients (37%): seven (21%) had coarctation of the aorta, two (6%) had restrictive ventricular septal defects, one had mild Ebstein anomaly, one had Shone’s syndrome, and one had cleft mitral valve. BAV was not associated with perioperative or immediate postoperative mortality. Immediately following the valvuloplasty, a more than mild aortic regurgitation was noted only in two patients (7%). A none-to-mild aortic regurgitation was noted in the remaining 93%. One patient died three months after the procedure. At a mean follow-up of 7 years, twenty patients (69%) had more than mild aortic regurgitation, and four patients (13%) required surgical intervention. Kaplan–Meier freedom from aortic valve reintervention was 97% at 1 year and 87% at 10 years of follow-up. Conclusion. Based on outcomes encountered at a tertiary center in a developing country, BAV is an effective and safe modality associated with low complication rates comparable to those reported in developed countries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.