ObjectiveTo determine the frequency of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) compared to healthy subjects (HS) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and to determine the ability of cardiovascular (CV) risk indices in detecting SSc patients with subclinical atherosclerosis.MethodsA total of 110 SSc patients (102 females and 8 males, mean ± SD age 50.5 ± 11.9 years), 110 age‐ and sex‐matched RA patients, and 51 HS without CV disease were examined with ultrasonography (US). Carotid intima‐media thickness (cIMT) >0.90 mm and/or carotid plaques were used as the gold standard for subclinical atherosclerosis (US+). Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), QRisk II, and 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) CV risk indices were calculated.ResultsTwenty‐one (19.1%) SSc patients, 24 (21.8%) RA patients, and 3 (5.9%) HS had subclinical atherosclerosis (SSc versus RA: P = 0.62, SSc versus HS: P = 0.029). cIMT in SSc was higher compared to HS (0.68 ± 0.15 mm versus 0.61 ± 0.10 mm; P = 0.008) but similar to RA patients (0.66 ± 0.14 mm; P = 0.82). Subclinical atherosclerosis in SSc was associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, P = 0.013), elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (OR 3.4, P = 0.045), and pulmonary arterial hypertension (OR 4.27, P = 0.012). Concerning CV risk indices, of the 21 US+ SSc patients only 0, 3 (14.2%), and 6 (28.6%) were classified as high CV risk according to SCORE, QRisk II, and ACC/AHA risk indices, respectively.ConclusionSubclinical atherosclerosis in SSc patients is more frequent than in HS, but is as frequent as in RA patients in which accelerated atherosclerosis is clearly defined. CV risk indices for the general population are considerably insufficient to detect SSc patients with atherosclerosis.
Background/Aim
The aims of the study are to compare characteristics of subacute thyroiditis (SAT) related to different aetiologies, and to identify predictors of recurrence of SAT and incident hypothyroidism.
Methods
This nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort study included 53 endocrinology centers in Turkey. The study participants were divided into either coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-related SAT (Cov-SAT), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine-related SAT (Vac-SAT), or control SAT (Cont-SAT).
Results
Of the 811 patients, 258 (31·8%) were included in the Vac-SAT group, 98 (12·1%) in the Cov-SAT group, and 455 (56·1%) in the Cont-SAT group. No difference was found between the groups with regard to laboratory and imaging findings. The aetiology of SAT was not an independent predictor of recurrence or hypothyroidism. In the entire cohort, steroid therapy requirement and younger age were statistically significant predictors for SAT recurrence. C-reactive protein (CRP) measured during SAT onset, female gender, absence of anti-thyroid peroxidase (TPO) positivity, and absence of steroid therapy were statistically significant predictors of incident (early) hypothyroidism, irrespective of SAT aetiology. On the other hand, probable predictors of established hypothyroidism differed from that of incident hypothyroidism.
Conclusion
Since there is no difference in terms of follow-up parameters and outcomes, COVID-19- and SARS-CoV-2- vaccine related SATs can be treated and followed up like classical SATs. The recurrence was determined by the younger age and steroid therapy requirement. Steroid therapy independently predict incident hypothyroidism that may sometimes be transient in overall SATs and is also associated with lower risk of established hypothyroidism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.