The use of triptans during pregnancy does not appear to increase the rates for MCMs or prematurity. The increased rates of spontaneous abortions in the triptan-exposed group and the increased rates of MCM in the migraine no-triptan group require further research.

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are increasingly used for a variety of mental illnesses; however, the data regarding the safety of these medications during pregnancy are inconclusive and contradictory. We examined the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in utero exposure to SGAs by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched the databases EMBASE and MEDLINE from January 1990 to December 2014. Eligible studies had to report pregnant women who took SGAs during pregnancy (first trimester exposure if analyzing congenital malformations), follow a healthy comparison group in a similar manner, and report data on pregnancy outcomes. There was no restriction on language, sample size, or publication date. The primary outcome analyzed was major congenital malformations, and secondary outcomes included miscarriages, stillbirths, preterm births, small or large for gestational age neonates, and differences in gestational ages and birth weights. A total of 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, totalling 1782 cases and 1,322,749 controls. The use of SGA during the first trimester of pregnancy was associated with a significant increased risk for major congenital malformations (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.93); however, no specific pattern of malformations was found. An increased risk was also found for preterm births (odds ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.20-2.86). The use of SGA during pregnancy was not found to be associated with an increased risk for secondary outcomes analyzed. The absence of a specific pattern of malformations makes it difficult to identify an explicit risk posed by SGAs, and therefore, further studies sufficiently controlling for confounding factors are needed to validate these findings.

Evaluation of human data regarding the outcomes of topical-retinoid-exposed pregnancies is important in terms of counselling pregnant women with inadvertent exposure. The objective of this study was thus to determine whether exposure to topical retinoids leads to an increase in the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We carried out a search using the Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from inception to 4 December 2014. The selection, review and quality assessment of the studies were carried out by two independent reviewers according to predetermined inclusion criteria. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by the random effects method. This meta-analysis, including a total of 654 pregnant women who were exposed to topical retinoids, and 1375 unexposed control pregnant women, did not detect significant increases in rates of major congenital malformations [OR 1·22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·65-2·29], spontaneous abortions (OR 1·02, 95% CI 0·64-1·63), stillbirth (OR 2·06, 95% CI 0·43-9·86), elective termination of pregnancy (OR 1·89, 95% CI 0·52-6·80), low birthweight (OR 1·01, 95% CI, 0·31-3·27) or prematurity (OR 0·69, 95% CI 0·39-1·23). No significant heterogeneity was detected among the studies for the evaluated outcomes. The present meta-analysis ruled out a major increase in the rates of major congenital malformations, spontaneous abortions, low birthweight and prematurity. This result may be used primarily in reassuring women who were inadvertently exposed to topical retinoids during their pregnancy. However, the statistical power is not adequate to justify the use of topical retinoids during pregnancy.

Pregnant women are almost always excluded from randomized controlled clinical trials, as the risks to the fetus posed by most new chemical entities or approved drugs cannot be sufficiently ruled out. Hence, a major scientific challenge in this field is to discover and validate alternative tools that will fill the knowledge gap created by the lack of participation in gold-standard randomized trials. This review focuses on novel tools that allow estimation of fetal risks after exposure to therapeutic agents, such as placental perfusion studies, biomarkers of fetal exposure, and novel epidemiological and pharmacogenetic tools, all of which have been tested successfully in recent years.