Repeated emergence, not international dissemination, is behind the rise of multidrug-resistant lineage 4 tuberculosis.
A PCR-based diagnostic method was developed for direct detection from tuber lesions of pathogenic Streptomyces causing common scab of potato. Primers were designed to amplify a fragment of the txtAB ( txtA and txtB ) genes, which are pathogenicity determinants in the main pathogenic Streptomyces species. The method was evaluated on 84 naturally infected potato samples, comprising 19 potato cultivars, harvested in the years from 2000 to 2004 in the Netherlands, the UK, France, Germany and Spain. Pathogenic Streptomyces in tuber lesions were detected by PCR in 70 samples and were also successfully isolated from these 70 samples. All pathogenic isolates showed the basic general phenotypic traits of the S. scabiei phenetic cluster. RFLP analysis of amplified rRNA sequences, together with carbon source utilization and repetitive BOX profiles, allowed most isolates to be assigned to S. europaeiscabiei , which emerged as the main cause of potato common scab in Western Europe.
Although clofazimine is used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), there is scant information on its effectiveness and safety. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate these factors as well as the tolerability of clofazimine in populations in Brazil, where it was administered at a daily dose of 100 mg·day (body weight ≥45 kg) as part of a standardised MDR-TB treatment regimen until 2006 (thereafter pyrazinamide was used).All MDR-TB patients included in the Sistema de Informação de Tratamentos Especiais da Tuberculose (SITETB) individual electronic register were analysed. The effectiveness of clofazimine was assessed by comparing the treatment outcomes of patients undergoing clofazimine-containing regimens against those undergoing clofazimine-free regimens and its safety by describing clofazimine-attributed adverse events. A total of 1446 patients were treated with clofazimine-containing regimens and 1096 with pyrazinamide-containing regimens.Although success rates were similar in patients treated with clofazimine those treated with pyrazinamide (880 out of 1446, 60.9%, 708 out of 1096, 64.6%; p=0.054), clofazimine-treated cases exhibited higher death rates due to tuberculosis than pyrazinamide-treated ones (314 out of 1446, 21.7%, 120 out of 1096, 10.9%) but fewer failures (78 out of 1446, 5.4%, 95 out of 1096, 8.7%) and less loss to follow-up (144 out of 1446, 10.0%, 151 out of 1096, 13.8%). No relevant differences were detected when comparing adverse events in patients treated with clofazimine-containing regimens to those treated with clofazimine-free regimens. However, the incidence of side-effects was less than previously reported (gastro-intestinal complaints: 10.5%; hyper-pigmentation: 50.2%; neurological disturbances: 9-13%).
The difficulties in managing multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB are well known. The regimens are very expensive, often toxic, and require up to 24 months to achieve an acceptable probability of success [1-3]. Based on successful experiences in different settings, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently provided recommendations on the prescription of a new "shorter" regimen to treat MDR-TB, which is also known as the "Bangladesh regimen" [4-8]. The regimen is composed of kanamycin, moxifloxacin (gatifloxacin being the fluoroquinolone originally used in the "Bangladesh" regimen), prothionamide, clofazimine, pyrazinamide, high-dose isoniazid, and ethambutol for an initial period (4-6 months), then moxifloxacin, clofazimine, pyrazinamide and ethambutol for the continuation phase (5 months) [8]. The regimen has interesting characteristics. It is considerably cheaper than the traditional "long" regimen (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.