The cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor on the rat pancreatic acinar cell is a G protein-coupled receptor that is phosphorylated in response to homologous and heterologous agonist stimulation. In this work we have studied the stoichiometry of receptor phosphorylation and have utilized one-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping after cyanogen bromide cleavage to demonstrate that the third intracellular loop is the predominant domain of phosphorylation of this receptor in response to these treatments. Of the average 5 mol of phosphate/mol of receptor, greater than 95% was on the third loop, with the remainder residing on the carboxyl-terminal tail. Serine residues were the site of greater than 95% of phosphorylation, with threonine representing the remainder, and no phosphotyrosine was detected. Further, we have utilized two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping after subtilisin cleavage to identify differing sites of CCK receptor phosphorylation which are dependent on the agonist utilized to stimulate this cell. Both qualitative and quantitative differences in phosphorylation sites were observed after acinar cell stimulation with different protein kinase C agonists. Further, distinct phosphopeptides on the map were identified as representing substrate(s) of a staurosporine-insensitive kinase activity stimulated only by receptor occupation with native CCK and were felt to represent site(s) of action of a member of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase family. This represents a sensitive and powerful approach that is applicable to sparse receptors residing in their native cellular environment to assess possible differences in patterns of phosphorylation which may be important in agonist-specific receptor regulation.

Phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors is an established mechanism for desensitization in response to agonist stimulation. We previously reported phosphorylation of the pancreatic acinar cell cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor and the establishment of two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of its sites of phosphorylation (Ozcelebi, F., and Miller, L. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3435-3441). Here, we use similar techniques to map sites of phosphorylation of the same receptor expressed on a stable receptor-bearing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-CCKR cell line. Like the native cell, the CHO-CCKR cell receptor was phosphorylated in response to agonist stimulation in a concentration-dependent manner; however, the time course was quite different. CHO-CCKR cell receptor phosphorylation increased progressively to a plateau after 15 min, while in the acinar cell it peaks within 2 min and returns to baseline over this interval. There were distinct qualitative and quantitative differences in the sites of phosphorylation of the two receptor systems. One site previously attributed to action of a staurosporine-insensitive kinase in the acinar cell was absent in the CHO-CCKR cell. Site-directed mutagenesis was utilized to eliminate predicted sites of protein kinase C action, but only two of four such sites affected the phosphopeptide map of this receptor. Chemical and radiochemical sequencing were performed on these and other phosphopeptides which were present in both the CHO-CCKR cells and agonist-stimulated pancreatic acinar cells to provide direct evidence for the phosphorylation sites actually utilized. Thus, these data support the usefulness and limitations of a model cell system in studying receptor phosphorylation and desensitization.

No abstract