BackgroundCurrent methods of amyloid PET interpretation based on the binary classification of global amyloid signal fail to identify early phases of amyloid deposition. A recent analysis of 18F-florbetapir PET data from the Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort suggested a hierarchical four-stage model of regional amyloid deposition that resembles neuropathologic estimates and can be used to stage an individual’s amyloid burden in vivo. Here, we evaluated the validity of this in vivo amyloid staging model in an independent cohort of older people with subjective memory complaints (SMC). We further examined its potential association with subtle cognitive impairments in this population at elevated risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodsThe monocentric INSIGHT-preAD cohort includes 318 cognitively intact older individuals with SMC. All individuals underwent 18F-florbetapir PET scanning and extensive neuropsychological testing. We projected the regional amyloid uptake signal into the previously proposed hierarchical staging model of in vivo amyloid progression. We determined the adherence to this model across all cases and tested the association between increasing in vivo amyloid stage and cognitive performance using ANCOVA models.ResultsIn total, 156 participants (49%) showed evidence of regional amyloid deposition, and all but 2 of these (99%) adhered to the hierarchical regional pattern implied by the in vivo amyloid progression model. According to a conventional binary classification based on global signal (SUVRCereb = 1.10), individuals in stages III and IV were classified as amyloid-positive (except one in stage III), but 99% of individuals in stage I and even 28% of individuals in stage II were classified as amyloid-negative. Neither in vivo amyloid stage nor conventional binary amyloid status was significantly associated with cognitive performance in this preclinical cohort.ConclusionsThe proposed hierarchical staging scheme of PET-evidenced amyloid deposition generalizes well to data from an independent cohort of older people at elevated risk for AD. Future studies will determine the prognostic value of the staging approach for predicting longitudinal cognitive decline in older individuals at increased risk for AD.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0466-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background: Lipidomics may provide insight into biochemical processes driving Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis and ensuing clinical trajectories. Objective: To identify a peripheral lipidomics signature associated with AD pathology and investigate its potential to predict clinical progression. Methods: We used Bayesian elastic net regression to select plasma lipid classes associated with the CSF pTau/Aβ42 ratio as a biomarker of AD pathology in preclinical and prodromal AD cases from the ADNI cohort. Consensus clustering of the selected lipid classes was used to identify lipidomic endophenotypes and study their association with clinical progression. Results: In the APOE4-adjusted model, ether-glycerophospholipids, lyso-glycerophospholipids, free-fatty acids, cholesterol esters, and complex sphingolipids were found to be associated with the CSF pTau/Aβ 42 ratio. We found an optimal number of five lipidomic endophenotypes in the prodromal and preclinical cases, respectively. In the prodromal cases, these clusters differed with respect to the risk of clinical progression as measured by clinical dementia rating score conversion. Conclusion: Lipid alterations can be captured at the earliest phases of AD. A lipidomic signature in blood may provide a dynamic overview of an individual’s metabolic status and may support identifying different risks of clinical progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.