<b><i>Background:</i></b> Ex vivo confocal microscopy using fusion mode and digital staining (EVCM) scans unfixed fresh tissue and produces rapidly digitally stained images of very similar quality to classical pathology. We investigated whether EVCM could represent an alternative to the standard histological examination of the pretherapeutic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) punch biopsies. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The objective of the study was to assess diagnostic accuracy of EVCM versus traditional histopathological examination for diagnosing and subtyping clinically suspicious lesions of BCC in 3-mm fresh and nonfixed punch biopsies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this prospective monocentric observational study, patients with clinically suspected BCC were consecutively enrolled. Punch biopsies were imaged using EVCM and subsequently processed for standard histologic examination (gold standard). EVCM images were examined by a dermatopathologist blinded to clinical aspect of the lesion and histopathological results. Concordance between the EVCM and histology analysis was calculated with Cohen’s kappa (κ) statistic. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Sixty-six patients were recruited, and 106 biopsies were analyzed. EVCM correctly diagnosed 70/73 BCCs and 31/33 non-BCC lesions, corresponding to a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 94% (positive predictive value = 97%, negative predictive value = 91%). The EVCM assessment led to over-staging and under-staging of BCC subtypes in 5% and 11% of cases, respectively. It led to over-staging and under-staging of BCC depths in 5% and 15%, respectively. The kappa coefficient for concordance was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69–0.88) when considering BCC subtypes and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.90) when considering BCC depths. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These results render EVCM as a promising option for “real-time” pretreatment evaluation of clinically suspected BCC lesions. Further larger randomized studies are needed to assess the efficiency of EVCM versus standard care in patients with clinically suspected BCC.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract