Background and ObjectivesMyxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is an aggressive soft tissue tumor with an unpredictable recurrence pattern. We sought to (a) determine whether margin status in MFS is correlated to rates of local recurrence (LR) and (b) identify demographic and treatment variables associated with disease‐related outcomes in this population.MethodsThis retrospective study identified 42 surgically treated patients with MFS over 10 years at a single institution. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, intraoperative variables, and disease‐related outcomes were recorded.ResultsThirty‐three (83%) patients had negative surgical margins and seven (18%) had positive margins. Four of 32 patients (13%) with negative margins developed subsequent LR compared to six of seven (86%) patients with positive margins (p < .001). Three patients (75%) with metastatic disease were deceased at the end of the study, while five (15%) without metastasis were deceased (p = .024).ConclusionsPositive margin procedures for MFS were associated with LR. However, negative surgical margins demonstrated a relatively high rate of LR compared to other soft tissue sarcoma subtypes. Furthermore, though MFS tends to locally recur and have a propensity for distant metastasis, patients are observed to have a higher probability of death from other causes.
PROMIS provides a feasible means to collect data in this population. Trends of improved function and decreased pain were seen after surgery. Continuing this study will hopefully elucidate more insight into the surgical treatment of MBD.
Background:
Studies have linked bibliometric indices with the academic level of plastic surgeons, but this relationship has not been explored with residency program directors (PDs). As teachers of the next generation, PDs’ academic performance is an important component of residency program success. We sought to identify distinguishing characteristics of integrated plastic surgery programs, focusing on their PD bibliometric indices.
Methods:
We identified plastic surgery programs based on 2021 Doximity reputation and research output rankings, respectively, and then divided them into four quartiles (Q1–Q4). PD academic history and bibliometric indices (h-index, the number of publications, and citations) were collected through Doximity profiles and program websites: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
Results:
Eighty-four programs were identified. There was a significant positive relationship between h-index, the number of publications, and type of research with reputation ranking (P < 0.05). After adjusting for years of experience post-training, h-index (OR = 1.24; P < 0.001) and the number of publications (OR = 1.05, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with reputation ranking. There was a statistically significant relationship between PD research fellowship completion and research output ranking (P < 0.01). After adjusting for years of experience post-training, h-index (OR = 1.05; P = 0.047) and the number of publications (OR = 1.01; P = 0.04) were significantly associated with research output ranking.
Conclusion:
Higher ranked programs tend to have PDs who have a strong record of scholarly activity, as evidenced by certain bibliometric indices.
Below-the-knee intervention of chronic limb-threatening ischemia is an area of increasing interest. Due to lower morbidity and possibly better clinical outcomes, endovascular techniques have become increasingly important in this patient population many of who have limited surgical options. This article serves as a review of existing stent and scaffolding devices utilized for infrapopliteal disease. The authors will additionally discuss current indications and review studies that are investigating novel materials used in treating infrapopliteal arterial disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.