Intravitreal melphalan for recurrent vitreous seeds from retinoblastoma appears to provide vitreous seed control in some patients. A high dose (50 μg) of melphalan is toxic and should be avoided.
IMPORTANCE Demonstrating the usefulness and complications of multiagent intravitreal chemotherapy is necessary for successful treatment in patients with recalcitrant vitreous seeding of retinoblastoma.OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and complications of combined intravitreal chemotherapy (melphalan hydrochloride and topotecan hydrochloride) for viable vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective study was conducted in a hospital setting. Trans-pars plana intravitreal injection of melphalan hydrochloride (40 μg in 0.04 mL of diluent) combined with topotecan hydrochloride (8-20 μg in 0.04 mL of balanced salt solution) was performed in 9 eyes, followed by injection site cryotherapy.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Complete regression of vitreous seeds of retinoblastoma.RESULTS Nine eyes, initially classified as group D (n = 6) or E (n = 3) according to International Classification of Retinoblastoma categorization, received a standard 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy and/or intra-arterial chemotherapy and subsequently developed recurrent viable vitreous seeds. Intravitreal administration of melphalan combined with topotecan produced complete control of vitreous seeds in all 9 eyes following a mean of 1.9 injections (median, 2; range, 1-3 injections). In 3 cases (33%), tumor control was achieved with a single injection, whereas in 6 (67%) cases, 2 or 3 injections were necessary. Three patients (33%) subsequently underwent enucleation because of recurrent tumor and persistent anterior chamber lesions. During a mean 15.2 months of follow-up (median, 16; range, 7-25 months), there was no recurrence of new tumor or vitreous seeds in the remaining 6 eyes. Complications included temporary hypotonia of 2 weeks or less (2 [22%]), temporary epithelial defect (1 [11%]), and vitreous hemorrhage (1 [11%]). There was no case of episcleral or orbital retinoblastoma extension or remote retinoblastoma metastasis. There was no change in the a and b waves of bright-flash electroretinograms.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Administration of combined intravitreal melphalan and topotecan in eyes not subsequently enucleated appears to be safe and effective for resistant or recurrent vitreous seeds from retinoblastoma. In 3 of the cases (33%), tumor control was achieved with a single injection.
Recurrence of neovascularization with bevacizumab monotherapy seems to be higher than that with conventional laser therapy among infants with Type 1 ROP in zone II ROP but reinjection of bevacizumab causes regression in most recurrent cases.
The results suggest that intravitreal injection of bevacizumab before vitrectomy for dense diabetic vitreous hemorrhage has no significant effect on facilitation of surgery or on the early postoperative course.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the pathological findings of the eye after intravitreal melphalan for viable vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma. All enucleated eyes receiving an intravitreal injection of melphalan (10-50 μg in 0.05 cc) were evaluated for histological changes. Of 25 treated cases, 8 eyes needed enucleation because of phthisis, parent request, or new tumor development. One of the cases was excluded from the study because of a history of intra-arterial chemotherapy with melphalan. There was no case of needle-site scleral involvement by retinoblastoma cells. In two eyes receiving 50 μg melphalan, no viable retinoblastoma cell was detectable in the eye. Severe gliosis, vascular occlusion, retinal necrosis, hemorrhage and neovascularization were seen. Histologically, intravitreal melphalan for recalcitrant or recurrent vitreous seeds from retinoblastoma appears to provide acceptable vitreous seed control. It seems that higher doses could be destructive causing ischemic necrosis in the retina, severe gliosis and secondary neovascular changes as well as having a destructive effect on retinoblastoma cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.