Topical antiseptics are often used to treat chronic wounds with biofilm infections and during salvage of biofilm contaminated implants, but their antibacterial efficacy is frequently only tested against non-aggregated planktonic or free-swimming organisms. This study evaluated the antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of four commercial surgical washes Bactisure, TorrenTX, minimally invasive lavage (MIS), and Betadine against six bacterial species: Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli, which are commonly isolated from surgical site infections and chronic wound infections using different in vitro models. We determined minimum planktonic inhibitory and eradication concentration and minimum 1-day-old biofilm inhibition and eradication concentration of antiseptics in 96-well plates format with 24 h contact time. We also tested the efficacy of antiseptics at in-use concentration and contact time in the presence of biological soil against 3-day-old biofilm grown on coupons with shear in a bioreactor, such that the results are more applicable to the clinical biofilm situations. In the 96-well plate model, the minimum concentration required to inhibit or kill planktonic and biofilm bacteria was lower for Bactisure and TorrenTX than for MIS and Betadine. However, Betadine and Bactisure showed better antibiofilm efficacy than TorrenTX and MIS in the 3-day-old biofilm bioreactor model at in-use concentration. The minimal concentration of surgical washes required to inhibit or kill planktonic bacterial cells and biofilms varies, suggesting the need for the development and use of biofilm-based assays to assess antimicrobial therapies, such as topical antiseptics and their effective concentrations. The antibiofilm efficacy of surgical washes against different bacterial species also varies, highlighting the importance of testing against various bacterial species to achieve a thorough understanding of their efficacy.
The Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for serious acute and chronic infections worldwide and is well-known for its biofilm formation ability. Recent findings of biofilms on dry hospital surfaces emphasise the failures in current cleaning practices and disinfection and the difficulty in removing these dry surface biofilms (DSBs). Many aspects of the formation of complex DSB biology on environmental surfaces in healthcare settings remains limited. In the present study, we aimed to determine how the protein component varied between DSBs and traditional hydrated biofilm. To do this, biofilms were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) on removable polycarbonate coupons in the CDC biofilm reactor over 12 days. Hydrated biofilm (50% TSB for 48 h, the media was then changed every 48 h with 20% TSB, at 37 °C with 130 rpm). DSB biofilm was produced in 5% TSB for 48 h at 35 °C followed by extended periods of dehydration (48, 66, 42 and 66 h at room temperature) interspersed with 6 h of 5% TSB at 35 °C. Then, we constructed a comprehensive reference map of 12-day DSB and 12-day hydrated biofilm associated proteins of S. aureus using a high-throughput tandem mass tag (TMT)-based mass spectrometry. Further pathway analysis of significantly differentially expressed identified proteins revealed that proteins significantly upregulated in 12-day DSB include PTS glucose transporter subunit IIBC (PtaA), UDP-N-acetylmuramate-L-alanine ligase (MurC) and UDP-N-acetylenolpyruvoylglucosamine (MurB) compared to 12-day hydrated biofilm. These three proteins are all linked with peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway and are responsible for cell-wall formation and thicker EPS matrix deposition. Increased cell-wall formation may contribute to the persistence of DSB on dry surfaces. In contrast, proteins associated with energy metabolisms such as phosphoribosyl transferase (PyrR), glucosamine--fructose-6-phosphate aminotransferase (GlmS), galactose-6-phosphate isomerase (LacA), and argininosuccinate synthase (ArgG) were significantly upregulated whereas ribosomal and ABC transporters were significantly downregulated in the 12-day hydrated biofilm compared to DSB. However, validation by qPCR analysis showed that the levels of gene expression identified were only partially in line with our TMT-MS quantitation analysis. For the first time, a TMT-based proteomics study with DSB has shed novel insights and provided a basis for the identification and study of significant pathways vital for biofilm biology in this reference microorganism.
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms are resistant to both antibiotics and disinfectants. As Staphylococci cell walls are an important defence mechanism, we sought to examine changes to the bacterial cell wall under different growth conditions. Cell walls of S. aureus grown as 3-day hydrated biofilm, 12-day hydrated biofilm, and 12-day dry surface biofilm (DSB) were compared to cell walls of planktonic organisms. Additionally, proteomic analysis using high-throughput tandem mass tag-based mass spectrometry was performed. Proteins involved in cell wall synthesis in biofilms were upregulated in comparison to planktonic growth. Bacterial cell wall width (measured by transmission electron microscopy) and peptidoglycan production (detected using a silkworm larva plasma system) increased with biofilm culture duration (p < 0.001) and dehydration (p = 0.002). Similarly, disinfectant tolerance was greatest in DSB, followed by 12-day hydrated biofilm and then 3-day biofilm, and it was least in the planktonic bacteria––suggesting that changes to the cell wall may be a key factor for S. aureus biofilm biocide resistance. Our findings shed light on possible new targets to combat biofilm-related infections and hospital dry surface biofilms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.