The B cell lymphoma-6 (BCL-6) transcriptional repressor protein is an important regulator of B cell differentiation and is strongly implicated in the development of B cell lymphoma. Expression of the Blimp-1 transcription factor, which is critical for promoting B cell differentiation into plasma cells, is repressed by BCL-6. We have investigated the mechanism for how BCL-6 represses Blimp-1 transcription, and have found that BCL-6 regulates the Blimp-1 promoter through a novel mechanism involving AP-1 elements. Specifically, BCL-6 is a potent repressor of transcriptional activity mediated by AP-1 factors. We found that the zinc-finger region of BCL-6 interacts with c-Jun, JunB, and JunD proteins but does not bind c-Fos or Fra-2 proteins. An estrogen receptor ligand binding domain fusion with the BCL-6 zinc finger domain can act as a estrogen-inducible dominant negative protein and increase AP-1 activity in BCL-6+ cells but not in BCL-6− cells, indicating that endogenous BCL-6 represses AP-1 activity. Additionally, we have confirmed a specific interaction between c-Jun and the zinc finger domain of BCL-6 in vivo using a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Repression of AP-1 function by BCL-6 may be a key mechanism for how BCL-6 regulates gene expression to control inflammation, lymphocyte differentiation, and lymphomagenesis.
Intrinsically disordered, highly charged protein sequences act as entropic bristles (EBs), which, when translationally fused to partner proteins, serve as effective solubilizers by creating both large favorable surface area for water interactions and large excluded volumes around the partner. By extending away from the partner and sweeping out large molecules, EBs can enable the target protein to fold free from interference. Using both naturally-occurring and artificial polypeptides we demonstrate the successful implementation of intrinsically disordered fusions as protein solubilizers. The artificial fusions discussed herein have low sequence complexity and high net charge, but are diversified by means of distinctive amino acid compositions and lengths. Using 6xHis fusions as controls, soluble protein expression enhancements from 65% (EB60A) to 100% (EB250) were observed for a 20-protein portfolio. Additionally, these EBs were able to more effectively solubilize targets compared to frequently-used fusions such as maltose-binding-protein, glutathione S-transferase, thioredoxin, and N utilization substance A. Finally, although these EBs possess very distinct physio-chemical properties they did not perturb the structure, conformational stability nor function of the green fluorescent protein or the glutathione S-transferase protein. This work thus illustrates the successful de novo design of intrinsically-disordered fusions, and presents a promising technology and complementary resource for researchers attempting to solubilize recalcitrant proteins.
Introduction: The combination of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that targets the immune checkpoint molecules CTLA-4 and PD-1 has shown clinical benefit beyond that observed with either mAb alone. This finding has prompted exploring whether such an approach could be applied within the context of additional combinations of checkpoint molecules, such as PD-1 and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3). Animal tumor models have validated combining anti-PD-1 with anti-LAG-3 mAbs in eliciting synergistic tumor-eradicating immunity 1 ; expression of PD-1 and LAG-3 on exhausted T cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) further supports their dual-targeting. We have developed a bispecific DART protein that targets PD-1 and LAG-3, aimed at inducing potent antitumor immunity through simultaneous blockade of non-redundant checkpoint pathways intrinsic to exhausted T cells. Methods: mAbs against PD-1 and LAG-3 were generated and selected for DART conversion based on binding, biophysical and functional blocking against their respective receptor/ligand axes, and functional activity in reactivation of prior superantigen-stimulated T cells or in antigenspecific recall assays. interactions with potency comparable to nivolumab* (anti-PD-1) or 25F7* (anti-LAG-3)-Enhances T-cell responses compared to individual mAb or combination mAb blockade-Demonstrates a PK profile comparable to that of nivolumab* in cynomolgus monkeys Further clinical development of MGD013 as cancer treatment is warranted
The objectives of this study were to quantity and compare the activities of a minimal heat shock (HS) promoter and other promoters used in gene therapy applications, and to identify strategies to amplify the heat inducibility of therapeutic genes. Human tumour cells were transiently or stably transfected with the HS promoter driving expression of reporter genes. HS promoter activity was induced transiently, with maximum activity 16-24 h after HS, and was dependent on temperature. The activity of the minimal HS promoter was similar, after 42 degrees C HS for 1 h, to that of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. To determine if the HS promoter could be used to activate a second conditional promoter, cells were transiently transfected with vectors containing both the HS and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV1) promoters. When the IL-2 gene was placed downstream of the HIV1 promoter. IL-2 production was temperature-independent. The addition of the HIV tat gene downstream of the HS promoter caused IL-2 to be induced more than 3 fold after a single 42 degrees C HS. These data indicate that the minimal HS promoter, following activation by clinically attainable temperatures (< or = 42 degrees C), can drive expression of therapeutic genes at levels comparable to the CMV promoter and be used in conjunction with a second conditional promoter to drive temperature-dependent, gene expression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.