COVID‐19 is a pandemic disease with a significant threat to public health. Public knowledge and perception significance in tackling pandemics have been evidenced in the previous research. This study aimed to explore public perceptions about pharmacists’ educational and prescribing role, and the medication delivery service provided during COVID‐19 outbreak. A cross‐sectional study was conducted among the general population of Jordan using a convenient sampling technique for 10 days (15‐25 May 2020). Data were collected from 578 participants who agreed to fill the questionnaire, which was distributed online. The questionnaire items were piloted using face validity and reliability. Participants showed a positive perception about the impact of pharmacists and pharmacy services provided during COVID‐19 outbreak. More than half of the participants (61.1%) believed that pharmacists could prescribe over‐the‐counter medications, and only 15.7% believed that pharmacists could prescribe both over‐the‐counter and prescribed medications. Linear regression was performed to assess the factors that affect the participants’ perception of pharmacists’ prescribing and educational role and delivering medication during COVID‐19. Females have lower perception scores towards medication delivery services compared with males ( P value = .008). However, male participants, those aged less than 50 years, those with postgraduate degrees and those from non‐medical profession showed a significantly higher perception score towards the impact of pharmacists and pharmacy services provided during COVID‐19 outbreak compared with others ( P value < .05 for all). This study indicates that the public positively endorsed the impact of the educational role of the pharmacist, medication delivery services and extending pharmacists’ prescribing authority during COVID‐19 pandemic. Also, findings from this study provide a platform to examine the perception of the public towards pandemic diseases and inform policy decision‐makers to react by updating their regulation to allow extending pharmacy services and prescribing role during COVID‐19 pandemic.

The reissuing, redispensing, redistributing, or even recycling of the returned unused stored medicines is referred to as medicine reuse. A few studies have examined people’s willingness to reuse unused stored medicines. This study aims primarily to explore the public’s willingness to reuse unused stored medicines in the future and the factors affecting their decisions, and to assess the pharmacological types and formulations of the unused stored medicines by the public. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenient sampling technique over three weeks (February–March 2022) among Jordanian populations. Data were collected from 681 participants who agreed to fill out a questionnaire, which was distributed online. Participants showed a positive perception of reusing any of the unused stored medicines in the future; of those, 79.6% (n = 400) believed that reusing “unused medicines” has economic benefits and 50% (n = 251) believe there are environmental benefits. Moreover, more than half of the participants believed that reusing “unused medicines” is safe (n = 256, 51%), but provided that a pharmacist or a doctor evaluates their quality or that the unused medicines are stored well. Results from this study show that the public positively endorses the idea of reusing unused stored medicines if the quality and safety are assured. However, future studies are needed to evaluate the Jordanian healthcare professionals’ perceptions towards medicine reuse and pharmaceutical companies’ willingness to be a part or facilitator of medicine reuse.

Rationale, aims, and objectives: This study provided a platform for electronic prescribing design features that may facilitate antimicrobial stewardship. This study aimed to identify software features within electronic prescribing systems and to assign priorities to these software features according to the opinions of the infection specialist health care professionals. Also, to identify any differences in priorities according to a professional group and experience in using electronic prescribing and communicate research findings to policy-makers and electronic prescribing manufacturers. Methods: The study was conducted in a large (600-bed) governmental tertiary and teaching hospital in Amman, Jordan. The survey was delivered by hand to antimicrobial prescribers (internists, surgeons, paediatricians, infectious diseases specialists, and critical care specialists) and non-prescribers (medical interns, clinical pharmacists, nurses, and other allied health care professionals) who filled out the survey face to face. The delivery of the survey started on March 15, 2020, and was closed on April 7, 2020. Results: Responses were received from 210 individuals. Interns represented more than one-third of respondents (n= 79, 37.6%), with 15.7% were internal medicine physicians. Among the healthcare professionals, around 44.7% (n= 94) are considered prescribers to antimicrobials, while others are considered non-prescribers (n= 116, 55.2%). The majority of respondents (n= 205, 97.6%) reported using an electronic prescribing and electronic health record system for part or all in their hospital, with 35.7% (n= 75) of them reported using these systems for more than one year. The prompt prescribing feature having the highest assigned priority was the allergy checker (n= 193, 91.9%) followed by the dose checker (n= 192, 91.4%). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the first attempt to describe views of healthcare professionals in Jordan about the potential significance of prescribing prompt and active prescription surveillance software features on clinical, microbiological and process outcomes to support antimicrobial stewardship. Findings from this study reveal considerable demand for additional software features expressed by the healthcare professionals charged with promoting rational use of antimicrobials and a consensus of anticipated positive impact on patient safety and efficiency outcomes.

Understanding healthcare professionals’ perceptions towards a computerised decision support system (CDSS) may provide a platform for the determinants of the successful adoption and implementation of CDSS. This cross-sectional study examined healthcare professionals’ perceptions, barriers, and facilitators to adopting a CDSS for antibiotic prescribing in Jordanian hospitals. This study was conducted among healthcare professionals in Jordan’s two tertiary and teaching hospitals over four weeks (June–July 2021). Data were collected in a paper-based format from senior and junior prescribers and non-prescribers (n = 254) who agreed to complete a questionnaire. The majority (n = 184, 72.4%) were aware that electronic prescribing and electronic health record systems could be used specifically to facilitate antibiotic use and prescribing. The essential facilitator made CDSS available in a portable format (n = 224, 88.2%). While insufficient training to use CDSS was the most significant barrier (n = 175, 68.9%). The female providers showed significantly lower awareness (p = 0.006), and the nurses showed significantly higher awareness (p = 0.041) about using electronic prescribing and electronic health record systems. This study examined healthcare professionals’ perceptions of adopting CDSS in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and shed light on the perceived barriers and facilitators to adopting CDSS in AMS, reducing antibiotic resistance, and improving patient safety. Furthermore, results would provide a framework for other hospital settings concerned with implementing CDSS in AMS and inform policy decision-makers to react by implementing the CDSS system in Jordan and globally. Future studies should concentrate on establishing policies and guidelines and a framework to examine the adoption of the CDSS for AMS.

Background Understanding health care professionals' perceptions towards a Computerised Decision Support System (CDSS) may provide a platform for the determinants of successful adoption and implementation of CDSS. Therefore, this study examines health care professionals' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to adopting a CDSS for antibiotic prescribing in Jordanian hospitals. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among healthcare professionals in Jordan's two tertiary and teaching hospitals (n = 254). The survey was adapted from a previous study and comprised demographic items and scales to measure perceptions of healthcare professionals towards the barriers and facilitators to the adoption of CDSS for antibiotic prescribing were developed. In addition, Uni and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to screen for factors affecting participants' awareness of using electronic prescribing and electronic health record systems in AMS. Results The majority (n = 84, 72.4%) were aware that electronic prescribing and electronic health record systems could be used to facilitate antibiotic use prescribing. The essential facilitator made CDSS available in a portable format (n = 224, 88.2%). While, insufficient training to use CDSS was the most significant barrier (n = 175, 68.9%). The female providers showed significantly lower awareness (P = 0.006) and the nurses significantly higher awareness (P = 0.041) about using electronic prescribing and electronic health record systems. Conclusion This study examined health care professionals' perceptions towards adopting CDSS in AMS. Results provide insight into the perceived barriers and facilitators to adopting CDSS in AMS.