Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used chronically to reduce pain and inflammation in patients with arthritic conditions, and also acutely as analgesics by many patients. Both therapeutic and adverse effects of NSAIDs are due to inhibition of cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme. NSAIDs are classified as non-selective and COX-2-selective inhibitors (COXIBS) based on their extent of selectivity for COX inhibition. However, regardless of their COX selectivity, reports are still appearing on the GI side effect of NSAIDs particularly on the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the harmful role of their controlled release formulations. In addition, previously unpublished data stored in the sponsor's files, question the GI sparing properties of rofecoxib, a COXIB that has been withdrawn due to cardiovascular (CV) side effects. Presently, the major side effects of NSAIDs are the GI complications, renal disturbances and CV events. There is a tendency to believe that all NSAIDs are associated with renal and CV side effects, a belief that is not supported by solid evidence. Indeed, lower but still therapeutics doses of some NSAIDs may be cardioprotective. In this review, we briefly discuss the GI toxicity of the NSAIDs and assess their renal and CV adverse effects in more detail.

NSAIDs depress prostaglandins synthesis through inhibition of COX-1 that is involved in maintaining cell integrity and COX-2 that, although presents particularly in the kidneys, is overexpressed in response to inflammation. Both the beneficial and side effects of NSAIDs are, therefore, through their inhibition of COX enzymes. Introduction of COX-2-selective inhibitors has improved the safety profile of the drugs with regard to their most common side effect which occurs at the gastrointestinal level but has not rendered them less cardio-nephrotoxic. Renal side effects of NSAIDs are rare, sometimes transient and often reversible upon drug withdrawal. The incident rate and the severity of the renal side effect, however, increase in patients with risk factors such as those with diabetes, heart failure, renal dysfunction and in the elderly. The side effects range from electrolyte retention and reduce glomerular filtration to nephritic syndrome and chronic renal failure. These effects are shared among NSAIDs with evidence of dose and exposure dependency. There is no known predictor for the nephrotoxicity. However, a relationship has been found between high plasma concentration and the renal adverse effect of NSAIDs. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with risk factors needs to be explored.

No abstract

Aims In¯ammation reduces hepatic clearance of many drugs with unknown therapeutic consequences. This study was carried out to examine the effect of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of verapamil. Methods Eight RA patients were age-and sex-matched with eight healthy volunteers. The disease severity was assessed, and ECG, blood pressure and verapamil enantiomers concentrations were measured for 12 h post 80 mg oral verapamil. Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and nitrite (NO 2 ± ) were measured in predose samples. Results IL-6 and NO 2 ± concentrations were signi®cantly increased in parallel with disease severity. Oral clearance of both S-and R-verapamil was signi®cantly decreased by RA. While the unbound fraction of S-and R-verapamil decreased by 5 and 7-fold, respectively, the unbound AUC remained unchanged for the more potent enantiomer, S-verapamil. AUC of norverapamil enantiomers was increased 2±3-fold. Despite elevated serum drug concentrations in RA, the potential to prolong the PR-interval was signi®cantly reduced by one fold and the effect on the heart rate and blood pressure did not increase. Conclusions RA results in increased verapamil concentrations due likely to changes in protein binding, decreased clearance and/or altered hepatic blood¯ow. A signi®cant decrease in dromotropic effect, despite increased serum drug concentrations, may be attributed to receptor down regulation caused by pro-in¯ammatory cytokines and/or NO.

Ketoprofen, a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) of the 2-arylpropionic acid class, has been used clinically for over 15 years in Europe, and has recently been introduced in the United States. Although it possesses a chiral centre, with only the S-enantiomer possessing beneficial pharmacological activity, all ketoprofen preparations to date are marketed as the racemate. Ketoprofen exhibits little stereoselectivity in its pharmacokinetics. The enantiomers have similar plasma time-courses and do not seem to interact with one another. Hence, the data generated using nonstereospecific assays may be used to explain the pharmacokinetics of individual enantiomers. The absorption of ketoprofen is rapid and almost complete when given orally. Sustained release dosage forms are available, which may be beneficial due to the short terminal phase half-life of ketoprofen (1 to 3h). They may also decrease local gastrointestinal side effects. Although with these preparations the peak plasma drug concentration is reduced and time to peak is prolonged, the bioavailability is the same as that with regular release counterparts. Ketoprofen binds extensively to plasma albumin, apparently in a stereoselective manner. Substantial concentrations of the drug are attained in synovial fluid, the proposed site of action of NSAIDs. It is eliminated following extensive biotransformation to inactive glucuroconjugated metabolite. There is about 10% R to S inversion upon oral administration. Conjugates are excreted in urine, and virtually no drug is eliminated unchanged. The excretion of conjugates is closely tied to renal function; accumulation of conjugates occurs in the elderly, but not in young subjects or patients. Significant drug interactions have been demonstrated for probenecid, aspirin and methotrexate. There appears to be circadian variation, particularly in the absorption of ketoprofen. The relationship between concentration and anti-inflammatory effect has yet to be elucidated for this drug.

FFD given with PEG-ES on the day before colonoscopy is a more effective regimen than the standard CLD regimen, and is better tolerated by patients.

Pain has both physical and emotional components. Physical noxious stimuli activate peripheral sensory neurons that, in turn, relay signals to the spinal and supraspinal nuclei. Subsequently, these signals activate areas within the brain associated with pain. Despite considerable knowledge in this area, analgesics may provide pain complete relief in only one out of five patients. Failure to manage pain may be due to a lack of understanding of the neurobiological processing of pain. Factors such as anticipation, anxiety and pain history play roles in the perception of pain. Non-neuronal cells such as those of the immune system influence perception and modulation of pain by the nervous system. In post-dental surgery patients, the severity of the pain and the relief following administration of anti-inflammatory analgesics has been linked to the time course of inflammatory mediators. Similarly, the relief of post-operative pain after abdominal surgery is also associated with a reduction in expression of pro-inflammatory mediators. Administration of anti-cytokines to sciatica patients and subsequent pain relief further emphasizes the role of pro-inflammatory mediators in modulation of pain. Increased expression of inflammatory mediators may also alter response to analgesia. For example, rheumatoid patients with temporal mandibular joint disease with increased expression of interleukins prior to treatment demonstrate inadequate pain relief after administration of anti-TNF-?. In addition, pain or its trauma impairs absorption of oral analgesics causing therapeutic failure. Improved analgesic pharmacotherapy may require a better understanding of the involvement of the inflammatory pathways.

Angiotensin II, the major effector molecule produced from the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, is a vasoconstrictor contributing to hypertension. Evidence indicates, however, that angiotensin II also is a potent proinflammatory mediator with growth and remodeling effects. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that angiotensin II blockade significantly reduces concentrations of proinflammatory mediators and oxidative stress products in numerous inflammatory models. Interruption of angiotensin II activity with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers has been beneficial for patients with inflammatory diseases. Much of this benefit occurs independent of the antihypertensive effect of angiotensin II interruption, suggesting a distinctive protective mechanism. Angiotensin II receptor blockers may represent a novel class of antiinflammatory drugs with indications far beyond cardiovascular diseases.