Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major public health burden worldwide, and its prevalence is set to increase owing to widespread population ageing, especially in rapidly developing countries such as Brazil, China, India, and Indonesia. Despite the availability of epidemiological data on the prevalence of AF in North America and Western Europe, corresponding data are limited in Africa, Asia, and South America. Moreover, other observations suggest that the prevalence of AF might be underestimated-not only in low-income and middle-income countries, but also in their high-income counterparts. Future studies are required to provide precise estimations of the global AF burden, identify important risk factors in various regions worldwide, and take into consideration regional and ethnic variations in AF. Furthermore, in response to the increasing prevalence of AF, additional resources will need to be allocated globally for prevention and treatment of AF and its associated complications. In this Review, we discuss the available data on the global prevalence, risk factors, management, financial costs, and clinical burden of AF, and highlight the current worldwide inadequacy of its treatment.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in women and men worldwide. During the past century, a range of risk factors have been associated with AF, severe complications from the arrhythmia have been identified, and the prevalence has been increasing steadily. Whereas evidence has accumulated regarding sex differences in coronary heart disease and stroke, the differences between women and men with AF has received less attention. We review the current literature on sex-specific differences in the epidemiology of AF, including incidence, prevalence, risk factors, and genetics, and in the pathophysiology and the clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with this arrhythmia. We highlight current knowledge gaps and areas that warrant future research, which may potentially advance understanding of variation in the risk factors and complications of AF, and ultimately aid more-tailored management of the arrhythmia.

Objective Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability is used clinically to assess cardiac autonomic function. High frequency power is related to respiratory sinus arrhythmia and therefore to parasympathetic cardiovagal tone. The relationship of low frequency (LF) power to cardiac sympathetic tone is less clear. We reported previously that LF power may reflect baroreflex function; however, in the previous study LF power was not adjusted for possible influences of respiration. In this study we assessed relationships of LF power, including respiration-adjusted LF power (LFa) using the ANSAR ANX 3.0 device, with cardiac sympathetic innervation and baroreflex function in chronic autonomic failure patients who either had or did not have neuroimaging evidence of cardiac sympathetic denervation. Methods Values for LF power with patients seated at baseline and during the Valsalva maneuver were compared between groups with low or normal myocardial concentrations of 6-[18F]fluorodopamine-derived radioactivity. Baroreflex-cardiovagal gain (BRS) was calculated from the slope of cardiac interbeat interval vs. systolic pressure during the Valsalva maneuver with subjects supine. Results Individual values for LF and LFa were unrelated to myocardial 6-[18F]fluorodopamine-derived radioactivity. During both sitting rest and the Valsalva maneuver the logs of LF and LFa correlated positively with the log of BRS (r=0.61, p=0.0005; r=0.47, p=0.009; r=0.69, p<0.0001; r=0.60, p=0.0006). Patients with low BRS (≤3 msec/mm Hg) had low LF and LFa regardless of the status of cardiac innervation. Conclusion LF and LFa reflect baroreflex function independently of cardiac sympathetic innervation.

Background Guidelines have proposed that atrial fibrillation (AF) can occur as an isolated event, particularly when precipitated by a secondary, or reversible, condition. However, knowledge of long-term AF outcomes after diagnosis during a secondary precipitant is limited. Methods and Results In 1409 Framingham Heart Study participants with new-onset AF, we examined associations between first-detected AF episodes occurring with and without a secondary precipitant, and both long-term AF recurrence and morbidity. We selected secondary precipitants based on guidelines (surgery, infection, acute myocardial infarction, thyrotoxicosis, acute alcohol consumption, acute pericardial disease, pulmonary embolism, or other acute pulmonary disease). Among 439 (31%) people with AF diagnosed during a secondary precipitant, cardiothoracic surgery (n=131, 30%), infection (n=102, 23%), non-cardiothoracic surgery (n=87, 20%), and acute myocardial infarction (n=78, 18%) were most common. AF recurred in 544 of 846 eligible individuals without permanent AF (5-, 10-, and 15-year recurrences of 42%, 56% and 62% with versus 59%, 69% and 71% without secondary precipitants; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54–0.78). Stroke risk (n=209/1262 at risk, HR 1.13, 95%CI 0.82–1.57) and mortality (n=1098/1409 at risk, HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.87–1.15) were similar between those with and without secondary precipitants, though heart failure risk was reduced (n=294/1107 at risk, HR 0.74, 95%CI 0.56–0.97). Conclusions AF recurs in most individuals, including those diagnosed with secondary precipitants. Long-term AF-related stroke and mortality risks were similar between individuals with and without secondary AF precipitants. Future studies may determine whether increased arrhythmia surveillance or adherence to general AF management principles in patients with reversible AF precipitants will reduce morbidity.

(AHA) guideline, the definition of hypertension was lowered from a blood pressure (BP) of greater than or equal to 140/90 to greater than or equal to 130/80 mm Hg. The new diastolic BP threshold of 80 mm Hg was recommended based on expert opinion and changes the definition of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH). OBJECTIVE To compare the prevalence of IDH in the United States, by 2017 ACC/AHA and 2003 Joint National Committee (JNC7) definitions, and to characterize cross-sectional and longitudinal associations of IDH with outcomes.

No abstract

Cip1-interacting zinc finger protein 1 (Ciz1) stimulates DNA replication in vitro and is required for mammalian cells to enter S phase. Here, we show that a significant proportion of Ciz1 is retained in nuclear foci following extraction with nuclease and high salt. This suggests that Ciz1 is normally immobilized by interaction with nonchromatin nuclear structures, consistent with the nuclear matrix. Furthermore, matrix-associated Ciz1 foci strikingly colocalize with sites of newly synthesized DNA in S phase nuclei, suggesting that Ciz1 is present in DNA replication factories. Analysis of green fluorescent proteintagged fragments indicates that nuclear immobilization of Ciz1 is mediated by sequences in its C-terminal third, encoded within amino acids 708-830. Immobilization occurs in a cell-cycle-dependent manner, most probably during late G1 or early S phase, to coincide with its reported point of action. Although C-terminal domains are sufficient for immobilization, N-terminal domains are also required to specify focal organization. Combined with previous work, which showed that the DNA replication activity of Ciz1 is encoded by N-terminal sequences, we suggest that Ciz1 is composed of two functionally distinct domains: an N-terminal replication domain and a Cterminal nuclear matrix anchor. This could contribute to the formation or function of DNA replication factories in mammalian cells.

Sex-specific differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, prognosis, and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly recognized. Women with AF generally experience worse symptoms, poorer quality of life, and have higher risk of stroke and death than men with AF. Effective treatment of the arrhythmia in women is critical to reduce the rate of adverse events. We review the current evidence on sex-specific differences in the utilization and outcomes of treatments for AF, including rate-control and rhythm-control strategies, and stroke-prevention therapy. In addition, we provide a critical evaluation of potential disparities and biases in health-care use that may be associated with differences in the outcomes between women and men.We underscore current knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in future studies to improve the management of AF in women. In particular, we suggest several strategies to produce quality evidence from randomized, clinical trials for women with AF.