Vision scientists have concentrated on studying two visual functions when it comes to assessing the sensory visual development in human: visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. The methods used to measure these visual functions can be either behavioral or electrophysiological. A relatively new technique for measuring the visual acuity and contrast sensitivity electrophysiologically is the sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP). This paper is a review of the literature on the sVEP technique: stimulus parameters, threshold determination, validity and reliability of sVEP are discussed. Different studies using the sVEP to study the development of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and vernier acuity are presented. Studies have demonstrated that the sVEP is a potentially important tool for assessing visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in non-verbal individuals with disorders affecting their visual system.

A temporal frequency of 7.5 Hz, a stimulus area of 4° or larger for VA and 10° or larger for contrast thresholds, and the use of a fixation target gave more viable readings, and may be indicated for future application. Consideration of the number of viable readings showed more differences between parameters than the actual thresholds, and it is suggested that more readings presumably would yield more reliable threshold measurements.

In order to develop criteria for the range of data points used for regression line fitting in sweep visually evoked potential (sVEP), which would be objective, clearly specified and give good repeatability and validity, and in order to investigate the effect of luminance on sVEP measurement, visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) were measured with sVEP in adults aged 17-30 years and children aged 6-8 years. Six to ten participants took part in each experiment. Five criteria (C0-C4) for fitting the regression line were implemented. Test-retest repeatability and validity against psychophysical thresholds at three luminance levels were considered for thresholds and the number of acceptable readings. There were significant effects of criteria (repeated measures ANOVAs, P < 0.05). The criteria, C2 and C3 (based on the range over which the signal-to-noise ratio >or=1), consistently gave better VA and CS, more viable readings, better agreement with psychophysical thresholds in adults and better repeatability than the other criteria. In the case of adults, C2 gave thresholds that were not significantly different from the psychophysical thresholds (P > 0.05). There was little effect of luminance over the 25-100 cd/m(2) range used. Overall, C2 performed the best and would be the criterion of choice, giving better repeatability, better validity and more viable plots.

These findings confirm a slightly later development of VA and contrast sensitivity (8 years or older) and indicate the importance of using SDT or forced-choice procedures in any developmental study to attempt to overcome the effect of criterion in children.