Objectives: This study aimed to assess the knowledge and practices of the general public in the Middle Eastern countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted between the 19th of March and the 6th of April 2020 in three Middle Eastern countries (Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait) to explore the knowledge and practices of the Middle Eastern population regarding COVID-19. A previously developed questionnaire was adapted and used for this study. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of COVID-19 knowledge. Results: A total of 1208 participants (members of the public) participated from the three countries (Jordan = 389, Saudi Arabia = 433, and Kuwait = 386). The majority of participants (n = 810, 67.2%) were females aged 30 to 49 years (n = 501, 41.5%). Participants had moderate overall COVID-19 knowledge, with a mean (SD) score of 7.93 (±1.72) out of 12 (66.1%). Participants had better knowledge about disease prevention and control (83.0%), whereas the lowest sub-scale scores were for questions about disease transmission routes (43.3%). High education level was an important predictor of greater COVID-19 knowledge scores (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Further public education is needed to address the relatively low level of education regarding the transmission of COVID-19 in the Middle Eastern countries. Policymakers are recommended to develop informative COVID-19 related campaigns that specifically target young people (university students), unemployed individuals, and those with lower levels of education.

Purpose To investigate the trends of hospital admissions concerning diseases of the eye and adnexa in the United Kingdom in the past 20 years. Materials and Methods An ecological study was conducted using hospital admission data taken from the Hospital Episode Statistics database in England and the Patient Episode Database for Wales. Hospital admissions data for diseases of the eye and adnexa were extracted for the period between April 1999 and March 2019. The trend in hospital admissions was assessed using a Poisson model. Results Hospital admission rate for diseases of the eye and adnexa increased by 73.8% [from 7.48 (95% CI 7.45–7.50) in 1999 to 13.00 (95% CI 12.97–13.02) in 2019 per 1000 persons, trend test, p < 0.001]. The most common cause of hospitalisation for diseases of the eye and adnexa was disorders of the lens (62.3%), followed by disorders of the choroid and retina (14.2%), followed by disorders of the eyelid, lacrimal system and orbit (11.5%). Hospital admission rate among males increased by 91.2% [from 6.19 (95% CI 6.16–6.22) in 1999 to 11.83 (95% CI 11.80–11.87) in 2019 per 1000 persons]. Hospital admission rate among females increased less sharply by 63.2% [from 8.71 (95% CI 8.68–8.75) in 1999 to 14.22 (95% CI 14.18–14.26) in 2019 per 1000 persons]. Conclusion There are clear gender and age trends in the epidemiology of hospital admissions related to eye and adnexa disorders. Further observational studies are warranted to identify other risk factors for these important causes of hospitalisation and understanding of differential trends.

We describe a diabetic patient with left eye endogenous endophthalmitis due to hypervirulent hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae (HKVP) originating from right renal abscesses. A rare source of HVKP causing endogenous endophthalmitis. Despite treatment with intravenous ceftazidime and pars plana vitrectomy, the patient required evisceration of the left eye. A high index of suspicion for endogenous endophthalmitis and awareness of the virulence and potential antibiotic resistance of HVKP strains in the community is needed to avoid vision and life-threatening consequences.

Purpose: Pigmented basal cell carcinomas (PBCC) is an uncommon variant of basal cell carcinoma of the periocular region with limited information in the literature. We highlight the clinicopathological profile and somatic mutations in periocular PBCC. Methods: The clinicopathological features and somatic mutations in patients with periocular PBCC were examined and compared with periocular non-PBCC reported in the literature. Next-generation sequencing panel analysis for the excised tumors identified somatic mutations. Results: In a total of 31 patients, PBCC was common in females (54%; p = 0.03); as a unilateral lower eyelid (n = 22; 71%), solitary mass (n = 30; 98%). Pathologic subtypes were variable. Most were nodular or mixed variants (n = 23; 74%). During the follow up (2.5–4.5 years), 1 patient (3.5%) had a recurrence. The clinical and pathologic features of PBCC were similar to those reported in nonperiocular locations. Somatic mutations detected in 25/31 tumors. Variants in 50/161 genes in the panel were noted. PTCH1 (14/31), TERT (12/31), and SMO (7/31) variants were common. Fifteen patients had novel drivers, including POLE, FANCD2, and CREBBP. SMO mutations were significantly more common in females (7/7), lower eyelid (5/7), and TERT mutations were more common in nodular subtype (10/12). Conclusions: In this large cohort of a relatively uncommon variant of BCC, the clinicopathological features and tumor behavior of PBCC was similar to periocular non-PBCC. The somatic mutation spectrum of PBCC resembles that reported in nonperiocular cutaneous BCC with novel drivers identified. We identified several potential actionable mutations that could be targeted with molecular therapy.