No abstract

The most common complications in plastic surgery are tissue reactivity, infections, and wound dehiscence. In the literature, there are only a few studies with sample sizes large enough and methods of statistical analysis appropriate for evaluating the role of suture materials in inducing such complications. In the 1000 plastic surgery outpatients in this study, the association of different suture materials, individual patient characteristics, surgeon skill, and wound site and length with postoperative wound complications (i.e., tissue reactivity, infection rate, and wound dehiscence) were investigated. No substantial differences were found between the different suture materials and suturing techniques. A moderate increase in the risk of tissue reactivity for silk and polyglactin 910 and a protective effect of thinner internal sutures were observed. In multivariate analysis, such differences were not statistically significant. Male sex [odds ratio (OR), 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval (CI), 1.06 to 2.72] and older age (OR, 2.34; 95 percent CI, 1.36 to 4.05) were found to be the most important risk factors for tissue reactivity and infection rate (male sex: OR, 5.1; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 15.9; older age: OR, 5.6; 95 percent CI, 1.9 to 16), whereas younger age was associated with an increased risk of dehiscence (OR, 3.06; 95 percent CI, 1.41 to 6.65). Wounds on the lower limbs showed a lower risk of tissue reactivity and wounds on the back a higher risk of dehiscence. Wound length was associated with the risk of tissue reactivity in one-layer sutures (OR, 2.92; 95 percent CI, 1.51 to 5.65). An increased risk of both tissue reactivity (OR, 1.53; 95 percent CI, 1.03 to 2.27) and dehiscence (OR, 2.44; 95 percent CI, 1.1 to 5.43) was observed for operations performed by less-experienced surgeons. Rather than factors related to suture materials and different surgical techniques, and with the exception of surgeon experience, general characteristics of the patients (i.e., sex and age) and of the wounds (i.e., length and site) seemed to be primarily responsible for local wound complications.

Sentinel node biopsy requires a multidisciplinary approach (surgery, pathology and nuclear medicine) for reliable results. The association of vital dye and intraoperative gamma probe for sentinel node harvesting has made the procedure more effective, less time-consuming and less invasive. Failures may be due not only to surgical mistakes, but also to improper nuclear medicine procedures or inaccurate histological evaluation of SNs. Methods for histological examination of the SN are still debated and not standardized but promising results have recently been obtained with molecular oncology techniques (RT-PCR).

The flow of nanocolloid in the lymph vessels of the head is rapid. In our experience immediate scintigraphic imaging was essential to visualize the pathways of lymphatic drainage and the first SLN. Radioguided SLN biopsy is therefore recommended within three hours. Injection of patent blue is inadvisable because of the poor concordance with lymphoscintigraphy and the risk of permanent tattooing of the face.