Previous observations suggested that functional antagonism between FLI-1 and EKLF might be involved in the commitment toward erythrocytic or megakaryocytic differentiation. We show here, using inducible shRNA expression, that EKLF knockdown in mouse erythroleukemia (MEL) cells decreases erythrocytic and increases megakaryocytic as well as Fli-1 gene expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses revealed that the increase in megakaryocytic gene expression is associated with a marked increase in RNA pol II and FLI-1 occupancy at their promoters, albeit FLI-1 protein levels are only minimally affected. Similarly, we show that human CD34 ؉ progenitors infected with shRNA lentivirus allowing EKLF knockdown generate an increased number of differentiated megakaryocytic cells associated with increased levels of megakaryocytic and Fli-1 gene transcripts. Single-cell progeny analysis of a cell population enriched in bipotent progenitors revealed that EKLF knockdown increases the number of megakaryocytic at the expense of erythrocytic colonies. Taken together, these data indicate that EKLF restricts megakaryocytic differentiation to the benefit of erythrocytic differentiation and suggest that this might be at least partially mediated by the inhibition of FLI-1 recruitment to megakaryocytic and Fli-1 gene promoters. (Blood. 2008; 112:576-584) IntroductionErythrocytic and megakaryocytic lineages derive from a common bipotent progenitor (megakaryocyte/erythroid progenitor, MEP) able to generate only erythrocytic or megakaryocytic progenitors. 1,2 A common bipotent precursor, precursor for erythroid and megakaryocytic cells (PEM), has also been characterized in the spleen of anemic mice. 3,4 Despite this very close proximity, the molecular mechanisms controlling commitment toward either one of these 2 lineages remain poorly understood.Two main models have been proposed to explain the commitment of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors. 5,6 According to the "instructive model," lineage commitment is dictated by specific extracellular signals such as cytokines. Although erythropoietin and thrombopoietin enhance the proliferation, survival, and differentiation of already committed erythrocytic and megakaryocytic progenitors expressing erythropoietin-or thrombopoietin-specific receptors, it is now well established that they have no instructive role in the commitment. 7,8 Available data are more compatible with a "stochastic model," suggesting that commitment is dictated by the spontaneous formation of specific and mutually exclusive combinations of transcription factors. 5,6 At least 10 different transcription factors involved in erythrocytic and/or megakaryocytic differentiation have been identified. [9][10][11][12] Most of them, such as GATA-1, NF-E2, TAL-1, LMO2, FOG1, and GFI-1B, are involved in the regulation of both erythrocytic and megakaryocytic differentiation. However, there is no indication that differential expression of either one of these 6 factors might be involved in the commitment decision. Several transgenic...
Although cardio-vascular incidents and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are among the leading causes of premature death in the general population, the origins remain unidentified in many cases. Genome-wide association studies have identified Meis1 as a risk factor for SCD. We report that Meis1 inactivation in the mouse neural crest leads to an altered sympatho-vagal regulation of cardiac rhythmicity in adults characterized by a chronotropic incompetence and cardiac conduction defects, thus increasing the susceptibility to SCD. We demonstrated that Meis1 is a major regulator of sympathetic target-field innervation and that Meis1 deficient sympathetic neurons die by apoptosis from early embryonic stages to perinatal stages. In addition, we showed that Meis1 regulates the transcription of key molecules necessary for the endosomal machinery. Accordingly, the traffic of Rab5+ endosomes is severely altered in Meis1-inactivated sympathetic neurons. These results suggest that Meis1 interacts with various trophic factors signaling pathways during postmitotic neurons differentiation.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.11627.001
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.