Oxidative stress is the result of the imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidants. Biomarkers of oxidative stress are relevant in the evaluation of the disease status and of the health-enhancing effects of antioxidants. We aim to discuss the major methodological bias of methods used for the evaluation of oxidative stress in humans. There is a lack of consensus concerning the validation, standardization, and reproducibility of methods for the measurement of the following: (1) ROS in leukocytes and platelets by flow cytometry, (2) markers based on ROS-induced modifications of lipids, DNA, and proteins, (3) enzymatic players of redox status, and (4) total antioxidant capacity of human body fluids. It has been suggested that the bias of each method could be overcome by using indexes of oxidative stress that include more than one marker. However, the choice of the markers considered in the global index should be dictated by the aim of the study and its design, as well as by the clinical relevance in the selected subjects. In conclusion, the clinical significance of biomarkers of oxidative stress in humans must come from a critical analysis of the markers that should give an overall index of redox status in particular conditions.

Protein disulfide isomerases (PDIs) constitute a family of structurally related enzymes which catalyze disulfide bonds formation, reduction, or isomerization of newly synthesized proteins in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). They act also as chaperones, and are, therefore, part of a quality-control system for the correct folding of the proteins in the same subcellular compartment. While their functions in the ER have been thoroughly studied, much less is known about their roles in non-ER locations, where, however, they have been shown to be involved in important biological processes. At least three proteins of this family from higher vertebrates have been found in unusual locations (i.e., the cell surface, the extracellular space, the cytosol, and the nucleus), reached through an export mechanism which has not yet been understood. In some cases their function in the non-ER location is clearly related to their redox properties, but in most cases their mechanism of action has still to be disclosed, although their propensity to associate with other proteins or even with DNA might be the main factor responsible for their activities.

No abstract

Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1a) is a well-known conserved protein involved in heterochromatin formation and gene silencing in different species including humans. A general model has been proposed for heterochromatin formation and epigenetic gene silencing in different species that implies an essential role for HP1a. According to the model, histone methyltransferase enzymes (HMTases) methylate the histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me), creating selective binding sites for itself and the chromodomain of HP1a. This complex is thought to form a higher order chromatin state that represses gene activity. It has also been found that HP1a plays a role in telomere capping. Surprisingly, recent studies have shown that HP1a is present at many euchromatic sites along polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster, including the developmental and heat-shock-induced puffs, and that this protein can be removed from these sites by in vivo RNase treatment, thus suggesting an association of HP1a with the transcripts of many active genes. To test this suggestion, we performed an extensive screening by RIP-chip assay (RNA–immunoprecipitation on microarrays), and we found that HP1a is associated with transcripts of more than one hundred euchromatic genes. An expression analysis in HP1a mutants shows that HP1a is required for positive regulation of these genes. Cytogenetic and molecular assays show that HP1a also interacts with the well known proteins DDP1, HRB87F, and PEP, which belong to different classes of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) involved in RNA processing. Surprisingly, we found that all these hnRNP proteins also bind heterochromatin and are dominant suppressors of position effect variegation. Together, our data show novel and unexpected functions for HP1a and hnRNPs proteins. All these proteins are in fact involved both in RNA transcript processing and in heterochromatin formation. This suggests that, in general, similar epigenetic mechanisms have a significant role on both RNA and heterochromatin metabolisms.

Here we report the purification, from Xenopus laevis oocyte nuclear extracts, of a new endoribonuclease, XendoU, that is involved in the processing of the intronencoded box C/D U16 small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) from its host pre-mRNA. Such an activity has never been reported before and has several uncommon features that make it quite a novel enzyme: it is poly(U)-specific, it requires Mn 2؉ ions, and it produces molecules with 2-3-cyclic phosphate termini. Even if XendoU cleaves U-stretches, it displays some preferential cleavage on snoRNA precursor molecules. XendoU also participates in the biosynthesis of another intron-encoded snoRNA, U86, which is contained in the NOP56 gene of Xenopus laevis. A common feature of these snoRNAs is that their production is alternative to that of the mRNA, suggesting an important regulatory role for all the factors involved in the processing reaction.Endoribonucleases play essential roles in RNA metabolism participating both in degradative pathways, such as mRNA decay, and in maturative pathways, to generate functional RNA molecules (1, 2). Despite the plethora of functions played by processing enzymes in RNA metabolism, in eukaryotes only a few endoribonucleases have been isolated to date. Most of these activities are involved in the biosynthesis of translation components. In particular, RNase P and RNase mitochondrial RNA processing are ribonucleoprotein enzymes, functioning as site-specific endoribonucleases (3, 4). Other well characterized endonucleolytic activities, such as the 3Ј-tRNase, the tRNA splicing endonuclease, and members of the RNase III-like family are protein-only enzymes (5-7). Although the majority of these activities participate in the biosynthesis of a specific class of RNA molecules, RNase III was shown to be required for a large number of different maturative pathways. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase III (Rnt1p) was shown to be involved in pre-rRNA, small nuclear RNA (snRNA), 1 and small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) processing (8 -12). Recently, Rnt1p was also shown to participate in processing the intron-encoded snoRNAs U18 and snR38 from their host pre-mRNA (13). Furthermore, a new member of the metazoan RNase III family has been identified to be involved in the RNA interference process (14).Another process in which the participation of endoribonucleases was expected to play an important role is the biosynthesis of snoRNAs. These RNAs are part of a complex class of molecules that are localized in the nucleolus where they participate, as small ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs), in different rRNA maturative events such as processing and nucleotide modifications (15,16). Most snoRNAs in vertebrates are encoded in introns of protein-coding genes and are released from the host primary transcript either by debranching and exotrimming of the spliced lariat (splicing-dependent pathway) or by endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA (splicing-independent pathway) (15, 16). There are only a few cases of intronencoded snoRNAs in vertebrates, which are released throug...

DNA is subjected to several modifications, resulting from endogenous and exogenous sources. The cell has developed a network of complementary DNA-repair mechanisms, and in the human genome, >130 genes have been found to be involved. Knowledge about the basic mechanisms for DNA repair has revealed an unexpected complexity, with overlapping specificity within the same pathway, as well as extensive functional interactions between proteins involved in repair pathways. Unrepaired or improperly repaired DNA lesions have serious potential consequences for the cell, leading to genomic instability and deregulation of cellular functions. A number of disorders or syndromes, including several cancer predispositions and accelerated aging, are linked to an inherited defect in one of the DNA-repair pathways. Genomic instability, a characteristic of most human malignancies, can also arise from acquired defects in DNA repair, and the specific pathway affected is predictive of types of mutations, tumor drug sensitivity, and treatment outcome. Although DNA repair has received little attention as a determinant of drug sensitivity, emerging knowledge of mutations and polymorphisms in key human DNA-repair genes may provide a rational basis for improved strategies for therapeutic interventions on a number of tumors and degenerative disorders.

The multifunctional APE1 protein is required for tumor progression and is associated with cancer resistance. It is shown that APE1 presents structural elements that function in distinct cellular roles, highlighting the molecular determinants of the multifunctional nature of this protein and providing the basis for a new role of the C65 residue.

No abstract