Heterogeneity within a tumour increases its ability to adapt to constantly changing constraints, but adversely affects a patient’s prognosis, therapy response and clinical outcome. Intratumoural heterogeneity results from a combination of extrinsic factors from the tumour microenvironment and intrinsic parameters from the cancer cells themselves, including their genetic, epigenetic and transcriptomic traits, their ability to proliferate, migrate and invade, and their stemness and plasticity attributes. Cell plasticity constitutes the ability of cancer cells to rapidly reprogramme their gene expression repertoire, to change their behaviour and identities, and to adapt to microenvironmental cues. These features also directly contribute to tumour heterogeneity and are critical for malignant tumour progression. In this article, we use breast cancer as an example of the origins of tumour heterogeneity (in particular, the mutational spectrum and clonal evolution of progressing tumours) and of tumour cell plasticity (in particular, that shown by tumour cells undergoing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition), as well as considering interclonal cooperativity and cell plasticity as sources of cancer cell heterogeneity. We review current knowledge on the functional contribution of cell plasticity and tumour heterogeneity to malignant tumour progression, metastasis formation and therapy resistance.
Highlights d Lineage tracing of partial and full EMT cells in breast cancer metastasis d Partial EMT cells cycle between hybrid EMT and epithelial stages d Partial, but not full, EMT cells are required for metastasis formation d Both partial and full EMT cells contribute to chemoresistance Authors Fabiana L€ uo ¨nd, Nami Sugiyama,
Highlights d A large number of TFs and miRNAs are critical for EMT to occur d EMT involves a temporal hierarchy of transcriptional networks d Reciprocal networks between TFs and between TFs and miRNAs regulates EMT d These analyses serve as a resource for exploring gene regulation during EMT SUMMARYEpithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) enables cells to gain migratory and invasive features underlined by major transcriptional and epigenetic reprogramming. However, most studies have focused on the endpoints of the EMT process, and the epistatic hierarchy of the transcriptional networks underlying EMT has remained elusive. We have used a siRNAbased, functional high-content microscopy screen to identify 46 (co)transcription factors ((co)TFs) and 13 miRNAs critically required for EMT in normal murine mammary gland (NMuMG) cells. We compared dynamic gene expression during EMT kinetics and used functional perturbation of critical (co)TFs and miRNAs to identify groups and networks of EMT genes. Computational analysis as well as functional validation experiments revealed interaction networks between TFs and miRNAs and delineated the hierarchical and functional interactions of multiple EMT regulatory networks in NMuMG cells.
Epithelial tumour cells can gain invasive and metastatic capabilities by undergoing an epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Transcriptional regulators and post-transcriptional effectors like microRNAs orchestrate this process of high cellular plasticity and its malignant consequences. Here, using microRNA sequencing in a time-resolved manner and functional validation, we have identified microRNAs that are critical for the regulation of an epithelial–mesenchymal transition and of mesenchymal tumour cell migration. We report that miR-1199-5p is downregulated in its expression during an epithelial–mesenchymal transition, while its forced expression prevents an epithelial–mesenchymal transition, tumour cell migration and invasion in vitro, and lung metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, miR-1199-5p acts in a reciprocal double-negative feedback loop with the epithelial–mesenchymal transition transcription factor Zeb1. This function resembles the activities of miR-200 family members, guardians of an epithelial cell phenotype. However, miR-1199-5p and miR-200 family members share only six target genes, indicating that, besides regulating Zeb1 expression, they exert distinct functions during an epithelial–mesenchymal transition.
During malignant progression, epithelial cancer cells dissolve their cell–cell adhesion and gain invasive features. By virtue of its dual function, β-catenin contributes to cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion, and it determines the transcriptional output of Wnt signaling: via its N terminus, it recruits the signaling coactivators Bcl9 and Pygopus, and via the C terminus, it interacts with the general transcriptional machinery. This duality confounds the simple loss-of-function analysis of Wnt signaling in cancer progression. In many cancer types including breast cancer, the functional contribution of β-catenin’s transcriptional activities, as compared to its adhesion functions, to tumor progression has remained elusive. Employing the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)–PyMT mouse model of metastatic breast cancer, we compared the complete elimination of β-catenin with the specific ablation of its signaling outputs in mammary tumor cells. Notably, the complete lack of β-catenin resulted in massive apoptosis of mammary tumor cells. In contrast, the loss of β-catenin’s transcriptional activity resulted in a reduction of primary tumor growth, tumor invasion, and metastasis formation in vivo. These phenotypic changes were reflected by stalled cell cycle progression and diminished epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cell migration of breast cancer cells in vitro. Transcriptome analysis revealed subsets of genes which were specifically regulated by β-catenin’s transcriptional activities upon stimulation with Wnt3a or during TGF-β–induced EMT. Our results uncouple the signaling from the adhesion function of β-catenin and underline the importance of Wnt/β-catenin–dependent transcription in malignant tumor progression of breast cancer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.