Ventricular dysfunction is a well-known complication in single ventricle patients in Fontan circulation. As studies exclusively examining patients with a single left ventricle (SLV) are sparse, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function in SLV patients by using 2D-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (2D-CMR-FT) and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). 54 SLV patients (11.4, 3.1–38.1 years) and 35 age-matched controls (12.3, 6.3–25.8 years) were included. LV global longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) and strain rate (GLSR, GCSR, GRSR) were measured using 2D-CMR-FT. LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass were determined from short axis images. 2D-STE was applied in patients to measure peak systolic GLS and GLSR. In a subgroup analysis, we compared double inlet left ventricle (DILV) with tricuspid atresia (TA) patients. The population consisted of 19 DILV patients, 24 TA patients and 11 patients with diverse diagnoses. 52 patients were in NYHA class I and 2 patients were in class II. Most SLV patients had a normal systolic function but median LVEF in patients was lower compared to controls (55.6% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.0001). 2D-CMR-FT demonstrated reduced GLS, GCS and GCSR values in patients compared to controls. LVEF correlated with GS values in patients (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between GLS values from 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE in the patient group. LVEF, LV volumes, GS and GSR (from 2D-CMR-FT) were not significantly different between DILV and TA patients. Although most SLV patients had a preserved EF derived by CMR, our results suggest that, LV deformation and function may behave differently in SLV patients compared to healthy subjects.
Purpose Ventricular dysfunction is a well-known complication in single ventricle patients in Fontan circulation. As studies exclusively examining patients with a single left ventricle (SLV) are sparse, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function in SLV patients by using 2D-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (2D-CMR-FT) and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Methods 54 SLV patients (11.4, 3.1–38.1 years) and 35 age-matched controls (12.3, 6.3–25.8 years) were included. LV global longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) and strain rate (GLSR, GCSR, GRSR) were measured using 2D-CMR-FT. LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass were determined from short axis images. 2D-STE was applied in patients to measure peak systolic GLS and GLSR. In a subgroup analysis, we compared double inlet left ventricle (DILV) with tricuspid atresia (TA) patients. Results The population consisted of 19 DILV patients, 24 TA patients and 11 patients with diverse diagnoses. 52 patients were in NYHA class I and 2 patients were in class II. Median LVEF in patients was lower compared to controls (55.6% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.0001). 2D-CMR-FT demonstrated reduced GLS, GCS and GCSR values in patients compared to controls. LVEF correlated with GS values in patients (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between GLS values from 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE in the patient group. LVEF, LV volumes, GS and GSR were not significantly different between DILV and TA patients. Conclusion Although most SLV patients had a preserved EF, our results suggest that, LV deformation and function may behave differently in SLV patients compared to healthy subjects.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Patients with a single ventricle are at risk for ventricular dysfunction in the long-term follow-up during and after completion of the total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). Hence a detailed assessment of ventricular function is of high clinical relevance in those patients. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) are routinely used to examine ventricular function with newer techniques, such as tissue tracking, enabling to determine regional and global myocardial deformation. Studies focusing on patients with a single left ventricle (SLV) are sparse. We assessed LV function in a larger cohort of SLV patients by using CMR feature tracking (FT) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Methods 56 SLV patients (mean age 12.0.5 ± 8.1 years) who underwent CMR as part of a routine clinical examination were included. The study population consisted of 20 patients with double inlet left ventricle (DILV), 25 patients with tricuspid atresia (TA) and 11 patients with various diagnoses. 36 patients had an echocardiographic examination within 3 months of the CMR study. Left ventricular longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain and strain rate were measured from short axis stacks at basal, midventricular and apical levels as well as from 4-chamber-views using FT. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV), ejection fraction (LVEF) and myocardial mass were determined from short axis images. 2D-STE was used to measure global peak systolic longitudinal strain and strain rate. In a subgroup analysis we compared patients with a DILV with patients who had TA. Results Apart from two patients, all patients were in NYHA class I. LVEF was preserved in the total group of patients (LVEF 56.1 ± 8.4%) and correlated well with global and regional circumferential strain (r= -0.38 to -0.74, p < 0.01), global radial strain (r= 0.33, p < 0.05) and global longitudinal strain values (r= -0.31, p < 0.05). There was a mild association between LVEF and age at Fontan completion (r= -0.28, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference between the results for global longitudinal strain from FT and STE in the entire patient group. In the subgroup analysis there was no difference in LVEF, LV volumes and global strain and strain rate values from FT and STE between patients with DILV and TA. Conclusion SLV patients in this study had a preserved ejection fraction along with an overall good health. The correlation of global and regional strain values derived from CMR FT with LVEF demonstrates that FT might be valuable to assess ventricular function in SLV patients during long-term follow-up.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.