PurposeThe receptors for hepatocyte and vascular endothelial cell growth factors (MET and VEGFR2, respectively) are critical oncogenic mediators in gastric adenocarcinoma. The purpose is to examine the safety and efficacy of foretinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET, RON, AXL, TIE-2, and VEGFR2 receptors, for the treatment of metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.Patients and MethodsForetinib safety and tolerability, and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated in patients using intermittent (240 mg/day, for 5 days every 2 weeks) or daily (80 mg/day) dosing schedules. Thirty evaluable patients were required to achieve alpha = 0.10 and beta = 0.2 to test the alternative hypothesis that single-agent foretinib would result in an ORR of ≥25%. Up to 10 additional patients could be enrolled to ensure at least eight with MET amplification. Correlative studies included tumor MET amplification, MET signaling, pharmacokinetics and plasma biomarkers of foretinib activity.ResultsFrom March 2007 until October 2009, 74 patients were enrolled; 74% male; median age, 61 years (range, 25–88); 93% had received prior therapy. Best response was stable disease (SD) in 10 (23%) patients receiving intermittent dosing and five (20%) receiving daily dosing; SD duration was 1.9–7.2 months (median 3.2 months). Of 67 patients with tumor samples, 3 had MET amplification, one of whom had SD. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 91% of patients. Rates of hypertension (35% vs. 15%) and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (23% vs. 8%) were higher with intermittent dosing. In both patients with high baseline tumor phospho-MET (pMET), the pMET:total MET protein ratio decreased with foretinib treatment.ConclusionThese results indicate that few gastric carcinomas are driven solely by MET and VEGFR2, and underscore the diverse molecular oncogenesis of this disease. Despite evidence of MET inhibition by foretinib, single-agent foretinib lacked efficacy in unselected patients with metastatic gastric cancer.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00725712

No abstract

MAVERICC compared the efficacy and safety of modified leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6-BV) with leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-BV) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). MAVERICC was a global, randomized, open-label, phase II study. Primary objectives were to assess associations between (i) excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) expression with progression-free survival (PFS), and (ii) plasma VEGF A (VEGF-A) with PFS in patients with previously untreated mCRC receiving mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV. Before randomization, patients were stratified by tumoral ERCC1/β-actin mRNA expression level and region. Of 376 enrolled patients, 188 each received mFOLFOX6-BV and FOLFIRI-BV. PFS and overall survival (OS) were comparable between FOLFIRI-BV and mFOLFOX6-BV, with numerically higher PFS [HR = 0.79; 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.61-1.01; = 0.06] and OS (HR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56-1.04; = 0.09) observed for FOLFIRI-BV. In the high ERCC1 subgroup, PFS and OS were comparable between treatment groups (PFS, HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.56-1.26; = 0.40; OS, HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.51-1.26; = 0.33). Across treatment groups, high plasma VEGF-A levels (>5.1 pg/mL) were observed with shorter PFS (HR = 1.19; 95% CI: 0.93-1.53; = 0.17) and significantly shorter OS (HR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.20-2.24; < 0.01) versus low levels (≤5.1 pg/mL). Safety findings for FOLFIRI-BV or mFOLFOX6-BV were comparable with those reported previously. First-line FOLFIRI-BV and mFOLFOX6-BV had comparable PFS and OS, similar to results in patients with high baseline tumor ERCC1 levels. There were no new safety signals with these bevacizumab-containing regimens.

No abstract

No abstract

Smokers experience aberrant gene promoter methylation in their bronchial cells, which may predispose to the development of neoplasia. Hydralazine is a DNA demethylating agent, and valproic acid is a histone deacetylase inhibitor, and both have modest but synergistic anticancer activity in vitro. We conducted a phase I trial combining valproic acid and hydralazine to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of hydralazine in combination with a therapeutic dose of valproic acid in patients with advanced, unresectable, and previously treated solid cancers. Twenty females and nine males were enrolled, with a median age of 57 years and a median ECOG performance status of 0. Grade 1 lymphopenia and fatigue were the most common adverse effects. Three subjects withdrew for treatment-related toxicities occurring after the DLT observation period, including testicular edema, rash, and an increase in serum lipase accompanied by hyponatremia in one subject each. A true MTD of hydralazine in combination with therapeutic doses of valproic acid was not reached in this trial, and the planned upper limit of hydralazine investigated in this combination was 400 mg/day without grade 3 or 4 toxicities. A median number of two treatment cycles were delivered. One partial response by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria was observed, and five subjects experienced stable disease for 3 to 6 months. The combination of hydralazine and valproic acid is simple, nontoxic, and might be appropriate for chemoprevention or combination with other cancer treatments. This trial supports further investigation of epigenetic modification as a new therapeutic strategy.

493 Background: Standard 1L mCRC treatment (tx) includes a CT backbone (e.g., modified leucovorin [LV]/5-fluorouracil [5-FU]/oxaliplatin [mFOLFOX6] or LV/ 5-FU/ irinotecan [FOLFIRI]) and biologic therapy (e.g., BV). The preferred CT backbone for anti VEGF tx is unknown. MAVERICC (NCT01374425), a global, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial, assessed tx efficacy and safety of mFOLFOX6-BV vs FOLFIRI-BV in pts with mCRC. Intratumoral ERCC1 and plasma VEGF-A were studied as biomarkers for oxaliplatin- and BV-containing tx, respectively. Methods: Pts with mCRC (≥1 measurable metastatic lesion, ECOG performance status ≤1) were randomized 1:1 to receive BV (5 mg/kg) + mFOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI every 2 weeks, stratified by ERCC1 level (low [£1.7] vs high [>1.7]) and region. VEGF-A levels were measured at baseline. Primary objectives were to evaluate: ERCC1 as a biomarker of progression-free survival (PFS) in 1L mCRC tx (mFOLFOX-BV vs FOLFIRI); and VEGF-A as a biomarker for BV and as a biomarker in combination with ERCC1 for PFS following CT + BV. Secondary objectives were to evaluate: the effect of ERCC1 and VEGF-A on overall survival (OS), objective response rate, hepatic metastases resection, and safety. PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier methods, hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by Cox regression, and p-values were based on stratified log-rank tests. ERCC1 biomarker analyses are presented here. Results: A total of 376 pts were randomized: median age, 61 yr; white race, 83%; US region, 85%. Baseline characteristics: ERCC1 high, 35%; KRAS mutant, 34%. Efficacy results are shown (see Table). Conclusion: Consistent with previous findings, PFS and OS were comparable in pts treated with either 1L mFOLFOX6-BV or FOLFIRI-BV. Exploratory analyses within pts with high ERCC1 levels suggest consistent results. VEGF-A analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01374425. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

No abstract