Based on the results of our exercise, the OMERACT US definitions for the identification of CPPD demonstrated to be reliable when applied to the TFC and AC. Other sites reached good kappa values in the web-based exercise but failed to achieve good reproducibility at the patient-based exercise, meaning the scanning method must be further refined.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the discriminatory ability of ultrasound in calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD), using microscopic analysis of menisci and knee hyaline cartilage (HC) as reference standard.MethodsConsecutive patients scheduled for knee replacement surgery, due to osteoarthritis (OA), were enrolled. Each patient underwent ultrasound examination of the menisci and HC of the knee, scoring each site for presence/absence of CPPD. Ultrasound signs of inflammation (effusion, synovial proliferation and power Doppler) were assessed semiquantitatively (0–3). The menisci and condyles, retrieved during surgery, were examined microscopically by optical light microscopy and by compensated polarised microscopy. CPPs were scored as present/absent in six different samples from the surface and from the internal part of menisci and cartilage. Ultrasound and microscopic analysis were performed by different operators, blinded to each other’s findings.Results11 researchers from seven countries participated in the study. Of 101 enrolled patients, 68 were included in the analysis. In 38 patients, the surgical specimens were insufficient. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for CPPD was of 75%—sensitivity of 91% (range 71%–87% in single sites) and specificity of 59% (range 68%–92%). The best sensitivity and specificity were obtained by assessing in combination by ultrasound the medial meniscus and the medial condyle HC (88% and 76%, respectively). No differences were found between patients with and without CPPD regarding ultrasound signs of inflammation.ConclusionUltrasound demonstrated to be an accurate tool for discriminating CPPD. No differences were found between patents with OA alone and CPPD plus OA regarding inflammation.

Objectives the aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between ultrasound (US) findings indicative of joint inflammation and both clinical and US features characterizing synovitis at joint level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in sustained clinical remission. Methods 24 consecutive patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission according to EULAR criteria (DAS28<2.6) underwent clinical and ultrasound (US) assessment. US examination included second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints of both hands and used a multiplanar scanning technique according to the EULAR guidelines. Results A total of 192 metacarpophalangeal joints were assessed in 24 rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical remission, defined by EULAR criteria (DAS28<2,6). Ultrasound examination found more active joints that clinical evaluation, both by grayscale (GS) and Power Doppler (PD). 105 joints from the total number of 192 had GS changes (54,68%). By scanning more than one aspect of a joint, we found 56 areas positive for erosions, in both hands, with more than half being hot erosions (53,57% positive for PD). Both, the median/average Power Doppler score and GS score were higher in the joints with erosions compared to those without erosions (p<0,01). Conclusions Joint with bone erosions are more frequently ultrasound inflamed, which explains the fact that treating the rheumatoid arthritis in the window of opportunity, before the radiological changes occur, would offer a higher chance of remission. In the same time suggests that some of the joints need local anti-inflammatory treatment, besides the systemic therapy with DMARDS Disclosure of Interest None Declared

High resolution ultrasonography has already become an important tool in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory arthritis of the hand and wrist, but lately it has been proven to be the method of choice in the evaluation of traumatic lesions of tendons, annular pulleys, nerves, and ligaments and at the same time in detecting foreign bodies. The objective of this paper is to review and describe the current knowledge on these US findings and to highlight the ultrasonography role in the evaluation of non-inflammatory conditions of the hand and wrist.

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of subclinical ankle involvement by ultrasound in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The study was conducted on 216 patients with RA and 200 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. Patients with no history or clinical evidence of ankle involvement underwent US examination. For each ankle, tibio-talar (TT) joint, tibialis anterior (TA) tendon, extensor halux (EH) and extensor common (EC) tendons, tibialis posterior (TP) tendon, flexor common (FC) tendon and flexor hallux (FH) tendon, peroneous brevis (PB) and longus (PL) tendons, Achilles tendon (AT) and plantar fascia (PF) were assessed. The following abnormalities were recorded: synovitis, tenosynovitis, bursitis, enthesopathy and rupture. BMI, DAS28, RF ESR and CRP were also obtained. A total of 432 ankles of patients with RA and 400 ankles of healthy controls were assessed. In 188 (87%) patients with RA, US showed ankle abnormalities whereas, in control group, US found abnormalities in 57 (28.5 %) subjects (p = 0.01). The most frequent US abnormality in RA patients was TP tenosynovits (69/216) (31.9 %), followed by PL tenosynovitis (58/216) (26.9 %), TT synovitis (54/216) (25 %), PB tenosynovitis (51/216) (23.6 %), AT enthesopathy (41/216) (19 %) and AT bursitis (22/216) (10.2 %). In 118 RA patients out of 216 (54.6%), a positive PD was found. No statistically significant correlation was found between the US findings and age, disease duration, BMI, DAS28, RF, ESR and CRP. The present study provides evidence of the higher prevalence of subclinical ankle involvement in RA patients than in age- and gender-matched healthy controls identified by US.

Aim: Accurate diagnosis and early treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can lead to a good outcome and a correct management of the disease. We aimed toinvestigate the prognostic value of anti-RA33 antibodies, by evaluating the relationship with ultrasonographic (US) findings in patients with early RA.Material and methods: We performed a prospective study which included 29 patients, diagnosed with early RA according to the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria and 21 sex and age-matched control subjects. All patients underwent clinical and biological assessment, followed by US examination in grayscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) at baseline and after 12 months [from the second to the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints and wrists (RCC), in dorsal aspect]. The second and fifth MCP joints were scanned also in lateral aspects.Results: The initial GS evaluation revealed the presence of synovitis in all 29 patients; PD found at least one joint with a PD grade higher than 1 in 23 patients, higher than 2 in 20 patients, and grade 3 in 6 patients; at 12 months, we revealed the presence of GSUS synovitis in 25 patients and PDUS examination found active synovitis in 12 subjects. In those patients, the anti-RA33 titre was significantly lower compared to those without PDUS active synovitis (p=0.031), with a moderately negative correlation (r=-0.519, p=0.0039).Conclusions: The current study shows that anti-RA33 antibodies might constitute an additional tool for diagnosing early RA patients and can help identify patients with mild disease and a low level of activesynovitis.

Aims: Doppler ultrasonography assessment is mandatory nowadays for the complete description of rheumatic disease activity. Initially it was performed in semi quantitative way but recently the (fully) quantitative assessment is gaining more interest. In quantitative assessment, the ratio between total colorized and total pixels (CTR) is computed for the whole image or just for the region of interest (ROI). The frame with the highest amount of Doppler signal (also called worst case scenario image – WCSI) is usually the only one analyzed. The technique requires a very precise identification of WCSI from a certain number of consecutive frames, captured from the same position of the US probe, (and in most cases this is done manually). Our study examined the ability of both experienced and in-training sonographers to identify WCSI using a computerized analytical system as the gold standard.Materials and methods: The study analyzed 480 frame selections done in two distinct exercises. The WCSI and other 3 images with a 5%, 10% and respectively 20% lower level of CTR compared with WCSI were packed in one selection. All frames emerging from the same video clip were randomly presented to six experienced and six in training sonographers; the request was to select the frame with the highest CTR (WCSI) from each package (twenty packages in total). A similar exercise was performed with CTRs decreasing in steps of 2%.Results: In the first exercise the WCSI was correctly identified in 79.1% cases and in 67% of cases in the 2nd exercise. The interobserver agreement between experienced and in-trainer evaluators for the 1st exercise was 0.78 and 0.4 in the 2nd exercise.Conclusion: Using computerized analysis as the gold standard, we demonstrated a large heterogeneity across sonographers regarding their ability to identify the best Doppler image even from a small group of frames.

No abstract