The six evaluated IR algorithms all improve the image quality in brain CT but show different strengths and weaknesses.
The purpose was to demonstrate a non-parametric statistical method that can identify and explain the components of observer disagreement in terms of systematic disagreement as well as additional individual variability, in visual grading studies. As an example, the method was applied to a study where the effect of reduced tube current on diagnostic image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT (MDCT) images was investigated. Quantum noise, representing dose reductions equivalent to steps of 20 mA, was artificially added to the raw data of 25 retrospectively selected paediatric cerebral MDCT examinations. Three radiologists, blindly and randomly, assessed the resulting images from two different levels of the brain with regard to the reproduction of high- and low-contrast structures and overall image quality. Images from three patients were assessed twice for the analysis of intra-observer disagreement. The intra-observer disagreement in test-retest assessments could mainly be explained by a systematic change towards lower image quality the second time the image was reviewed. The inter-observer comparisons showed that the paediatric radiologist was more critical of the overall image quality, while the neuroradiologists were more critical of the reproduction of the basal ganglia. Differences between the radiologists regarding the extent to which they used the whole classification scale were also found. The statistical method used was able to identify and separately measure a presence of bias apart from additional individual variability within and between the radiologists which is, at the time of writing, not attainable by any other statistical approach suitable for paired, ordinal data.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of reducing the radiation dose to paediatric patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) brain examination by using image-enhancing software. Artificial noise was added to the raw data collected from 20 patients aged between 1 and 10 y to simulate tube current reductions of 20, 40 and 60 mA. All images were created in duplicate; one set of images remained unprocessed whereas the other was processed with image-enhancing software. Three paediatric radiologists assessed the image quality based on their ability to visualise the high- and low-contrast structures and their overall impression of the diagnostic value of the image. For patients aged 6-10 y, it was found that dose reductions from 27 mGy (CTDI(vol)) to 23 mGy (15 %) in the upper brain and from 32 to 28 mGy (13 %) in the lower brain were possible for standard diagnostic CT examinations when using the image-enhancing filter. For patients 1-5 y, the results for standard diagnostics in the upper brain were inconclusive, for the lower brain no dose reductions were found possible.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tube current on diagnostic image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT (MDCT) images in order to identify the minimum radiation dose required to reproduce acceptable levels of different diagnostic image qualities. Original digital scanning data (raw data) were selected retrospectively from routine MDCT brain examinations of 25 paediatric patients. All examinations had been performed using axial scanning on an eight-slice MDCT (LightSpeed Ultra, GE Healthcare). Their ages ranged from newborn to 15 years. Quantum noise was added artificially to the raw data representing dose reductions equivalent to steps of 20 mA. Patient identification information was removed. Three experienced radiologists blindly and randomly assessed the resulting images from two different levels of the brain with regard to reproduction of structures and overall image quality. Final data were evaluated using the non-parametric statistical approach of inter-scale concordance. The minimum value of tube current-time product (mAs) required to reproduce an image of sufficient diagnostic quality was established in relation to the age of the patient. The corresponding CT dose index values by volume (CTDI(vol) (mGy)) were also established. In conclusion, acceptable reproduction of low-contrast structures was possible at CTDI(vol) values down to 20 mGy (patients 1-5 years old). For acceptable reproduction of high-contrast structures, CTDI(vol) values down to 10 mGy were considered possible (patients 1-5 years old). The original image quality for patients under 6 months of age (15 mGy) was found to be inadequate for acceptable reproduction of low-contrast structures.
The purpose of this study was to develop an equation with which to determine the tube current to be used in order to obtain a certain image noise level for differently sized children undergoing multi-slice computed tomography examination. The relationship between image noise and detector dose for different examination protocols was established for a LightSpeed Ultra, an eight slice CT from GEMS, using homogeneous water phantoms of different sizes. Three different anatomical areas (head, thorax and abdomen) were studied in 111 patients between 0 and 17 y of age. The mean ratio between the calculated and the measured noise in patient images was established for the different areas. Head examinations showed the best correlation (measured-to-calculated noise ratio = 1.01). In the thorax, the calculated noise was generally higher than the measured noise (ratio = 0.74), and in the abdomen, the opposite result was found (ratio = 1.20).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.