Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) is a rare clinical condition but is frequently associated with esophageal atresia (EA). The aim of this study is to report the diagnosis, management, and outcome of CES associated with EA. Medical charts of CES-EA patients from Lille University Hospital, Sainte-Justine Hospital, and Montreal Children's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen patients (13 boys) were included. The incidence of CES in patients with EA was 3.6%. Fifteen patients had a type C EA, one had a type A EA, and one had an isolated tracheoesophageal fistula. Seven patients had associated additional malformations. The mean age at diagnosis was 11.6 months. All but two patients had non-specific symptoms such as regurgitations or dysphagia. One CES was diagnosed at the time of surgical repair of EA. In 12 patients, CES was suspected based on abnormal barium swallow. In the remaining four, the diagnostic was confirmed by esophagoscopy. Eleven patients were treated by dilation only (1-3 dilations/patient). Six patients underwent surgery (resection and anastomosis) because of failure of attempted dilations (1-7 dilations/patient). Esophageal perforation was encountered in three patients (18%). Three patients had histologically proven tracheobronchial remnants. CES associated with EA is frequent. A high index of suspicion for CES must remain in the presence of EA. Dilatation may be effective to treat some of them, but perforation is frequent. Surgery may be required, especially in CES secondary to ectopic tracheobronchial remnants.

Background Radial head alignment is the key to determine elbow reduction after treatment of subluxations or Monteggia fractures. The radiocapitellar ratio (RCR) quantifies the degree of subluxation, by evaluating radial head alignment with the capitellum of the humerus; this ratio is reproducible when measured on true lateral radiographs of nonsubluxated elbows. However, the impact of beam angulation on RCR measurement is unknown. Questions/purposes Our hypotheses were that the RCR of the nonsubluxated elbow would remain in the normal range as the beam angle changed and that the RCR variability would increase for the subluxated elbow with small deviations in the beam angle. Methods Radiographs were taken of six healthy cadaveric extremities using beam angles ranging from À20°to 20°a long the inferosuperior axis and from À20°to 20°along the dorsoventral axis. The same views then were taken of the six arms with anterior radiocapitellum subluxation followed by posterior radiocapitellum subluxation. RCRs were measured by one observer. As a reference value, the RCR was measured in the 0°to 0°position and the difference between each RCR in a nonreference position was subtracted from each RCR reference to obtain the delta-RCR. An ANOVA was performed to assess the main and interactive effects on the RCR measured in each C-arm position compared with the RCR measured on a true lateral radiograph. Results The RCR remained in the normal range even as the beam angle of the C-arm varied between À20°and 20°. The position of the beam did not affect the RCR in anteriorly subluxated elbows (p = 0.777), whereas RCR variation increased especially in the presence of posterior radial head subluxation when the C-arm position was 10°o r more out of plane (p = 0.006). The inferosuperior malposition of the C-arm had a greater impact on quantification of radial head alignment measurement. Despite that, the RCR measurement is reliable in reduced and subluxated elbows on lateral radiographs with a C-arm position deviation of as much as 20°.