The Dutch Threatening Medical Situations Inventory (TM%) has been developed to measure cognitive confrontation ('monitoring') and cognitive avoidance ('blunting') within the domain of medical threat. It consists of four scenarios of threatening medical situations. followed by monitoring and blunting alternatives. Its psychometric properties are investigated in students (IV = 123) dental (IV = 80). HIV-(N = 42) and surgery patients (N = 123). For both scales, internal consistencies proved to be satisfactory. Slight sex and age effects are found. Furthermore, there is a strong situation effect: the scenario highest in controllability shows relatively high monitoring and low blunting scores. Factor structure is stable across samples and shows a good fit with the predicted factor solution. Both scales are found to converge and diverge in a theoretically meaningful manner with a variety of coping style and anxiety measures. In two samples, a sample specific stress scenario was added. but the psychometric qualities of such an extension should not be taken for granted. In an additional sample of working people (N = 48) test-retest reliability proved to be good. It is concluded that the TMSI is a useful instrument for assessmg cognitive confrontation and avoidance in medical patients. An English as well as a German translation are available.
In this study, the authors examined the process that family members go through when they are confronted with traumatic coma. They conducted 24 semistructured interviews with 22 family members of 16 coma patients and analyzed the data using the constant comparative method as proposed by grounded theory. Hope was the most prominent theme. It can be described as keeping a possible positive outcome in mind in an uncertain situation, knowing that this outcome is unlikely to happen. Hope was found to evolve stepwise up and down, dependent on further events and information: big steps at first, smaller later on. Hope helps family members to keep going and to manage care for the patient and for each other. Family members were found to protect themselves against false or unjustified hope by seeking valid information. They alternate their moments of despair, and in their interactions they respect each other's hope.
Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is an accepted outcome measure in patients with mood and anxiety disorders. Yet, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the determinants. In this paper we test the hypothesis that it is associated with personality traits while controlling for mental disorders. Methods: A large sample of outpatients (n=640) with mood and anxiety disorders was studied. The empirically supported five factor model of normal personality traits was assessed using the NEO-FFI and includes: neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Mental disorders were assessed with the CIDI, and HRQL with the SF-36. Results: Regression analyses revealed that the NEO-FFI scores, with the exception of conscientiousness, were significantly associated with SF-36 subscales and summary scores, independently from the mental disorders. The percentage of explained variance due to the personality traits was highest for the subscales Vitality (10.0%), Mental Health (13.3%) and the Mental Health Summary Score (9.5%). Furthermore, specific personality traits were related to specific SF-36 subscales. Conclusions: A low HRQL of patients with mood or anxiety disorders is not only determined by the disease or the current health but is also shaped by personality traits that are relatively stable throughout an individual's life time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.