The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of treatment with omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, on asthma-related quality of life (AQoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma.A total of 546 patients with allergic asthma were randomised to double-blind subcutaneous treatment with either placebo or omalizumab for 52 weeks. A constant beclomethasone dipropionate dose was maintained during the first 16 weeks (steroidstable phase). This was followed by a 12-week steroid-reduction phase. The core study was followed by a 24-week double-blind extension phase. AQoL was evaluated at baseline and at the end of the steroid-stable (week 16), steroid-reduction (week 28) and extension phases (week 52) using the Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ).Baseline AQLQ scores were comparable for the two treatment groups. Relative to placebo, omalizumab-treated patients demonstrated statistically significant improvements from baseline across all four AQLQ domains, as well as overall AQoL score, at weeks 16 (except environmental exposure), 28 and 52. Patients on omalizumab were also more likely to achieve clinically significant improvements in AQoL during the course of the study. Overall, almost 70% of patients and investigators rated treatment with omalizumab as "excellent/good", compared with y40% of placebo recipients.Clinical studies show that omalizumab enhances disease control whilst reducing corticosteroid consumption in patients with allergic asthma. The results of the present study show that these changes are paralleled by improvements in asthma-related quality of life that are meaningful to such patients.

No abstract

ABSTRACT. Background and Objective. Omalizumab is a recombinant, humanized, monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, developed for the treatment of IgE-mediated diseases. In children with allergic asthma, it was shown to reduce the requirement for inhaled corticosteroids while protecting against disease exacerbation. Here we report the effects of treatment with omalizumab on asthma-related quality of life (AQoL) in children with allergic asthma.Methods. This evaluation was part of a previously reported 28-week, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of omalizumab (at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE [IU/mL] per 4 weeks) in children with allergic asthma who were well controlled on daily treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Dosage of beclomethasone dipropionate was kept constant for 16 weeks (steroid-stable phase), then reduced over 8 weeks to the minimum effective dose (steroid-reduction phase). This dose was then maintained for the final 4 weeks. The Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) was administered at baseline, week 16, and week 28.Results. Baseline demographics, PAQLQ scores, and other data were comparable for the 2 treatment groups. At the end of the steroid-reduction phase, patients in the omalizumab-treated group reported significant improvements in the "activities" and "symptoms" domain scores as well as overall AQoL compared with placebo. More patients in the omalizumab group achieved clinically relevant (>0.5) changes in PAQLQ scores during the course of the study, and this difference was significant for activities and overall AQoL. ABBREVIATIONS. QoL, quality of life; PAQLQ, Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; IgE, immunoglobulin E; AQoL, asthma-related quality of life; BDP, beclomethasone dipropionate. Conclusion. Omalizumab improves

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to compare the incidence of anaemia in patients treated with zidovudine (ZDV) with that in patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) not including ZDV. MethodsUsing HIV Insight, a database of abstracted US HIV care centre medical charts, ZDV-naïve patients starting ZDV-containing HAART were compared with those starting non-ZDV, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing HAART. Cohorts were divided as follows: group 1: without baseline anaemia [haemoglobin (Hb) 11 g/dL]; group 2: with baseline anaemia (Hb o11 g/dL). The incidence of anaemia (anaemia diagnosis, Hb o11 g/dL, erythropoietic therapy or blood transfusion) was computed for group 1. The anaemia hazard ratio (HR) was adjusted using Cox regression. The rate of worsening anaemia (Hb decrease 1.0 g/dL) was computed for group 2. ResultsIn group 1, the incidence of anaemia was 24.3 and 8.1 per 100 person-years in the ZDV and non-ZDV cohorts, respectively, after 6 months of follow-up, and 12.5 and 5.3 per 100 person-years after 24 months. Significant predictors of anaemia were ZDV, low initial Hb, injecting drug use, CD4 count o200 cells/mL and AIDS. The adjusted HR for ZDV was 1.6 (P 5 0.005). In group 2, the ZDV/ non-ZDV risk ratio for worsening anaemia was 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1-4.3). ConclusionsPatients initiating ZDV-containing HAART are at greater risk of developing new anaemia or worsening anaemia than patients initiating non-ZDV-containing HAART.

HIV screening rates were low and varied by STD categories. Females and younger and older patients were at increased risk of no HIV screening. Requiring specific written informed consent for HIV screening resulted in less HIV screening. Interventions are urgently needed to increase the HIV screening rate among this at-risk population.