The European blood legislation has defined several key quality elements to achieve Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) in the field of blood transfusion. During the recent years, the blood legislation is in the process of implementation throughout its member states. Following the Directive 2002/98/EC, Directive 2005/62/EC has given further requirements for quality‐management systems to be fulfilled by blood establishments. In addition, GMP/Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and ISO standards are used inter alia by blood establishments. In order to support the implementation of the blood legislation, the European Public Health Work Plan (2005/2007) has cofunded two projects, led by the German Red Cross and supported by the European Blood Alliance, delivering a common European Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) methodology (EU‐Q‐Blood‐SOP) and criteria and standards for the inspection of blood establishments (EUBIS). The EU‐SOP manual will assist blood establishments in preparing for the inspection of their services related to the implementation of quality relevant elements required by the EU Directive 2002/98/EC and its technical annexes. The standards and criteria for inspection of blood establishments will cross‐reference existing quality standards to the directive requirements and define requirements for the structure of quality‐management systems based on the directive 2002/98/EC and its technical annexes. Based on these requirements, inspection standards and criteria are developed to assist in the independent assessment of quality systems established by individual blood establishments. These assessments are done in relation to the requirements defined by the European Union legislation on blood, in order to safeguard the quality of blood and to achieve continuous improvement of its quality throughout Europe.
Background and Objectives The Public Health Programme (Directorate General Sanco) gave impetus to the need for equivalent recognition of inspections of blood establishments among European Member States (MS) through the development and implementation of commonly accepted criteria and standards by funding the European Blood Inspection Project (EuBIS) (HYPERLINK “http://www.eubis-europe.eu”http://www.eubis-europe.eu). EuBIS is a collaborative effort of 27 representatives from 19 MS, including governmental institutions, blood establishments and competent authorities. It has cooperative working partnerships with five organisations, three projects, and is supported by the European Blood Alliance (EBA). Materials and Methods EuBIS is the first project that has brought together regulators (competent authorities) and manufacturers (blood establishments) to jointly develop criteria and standards aimed to assist: blood establishments in need to optimise their quality system and self‐inspection process blood establishments to prepare for regulatory inspections by competent authorities competent authorities, which wish to use the manuals and training guide as a reference for the implementation process of legislative requirements related to regulatory inspections. Results These standards and criteria have been finalised and published in a EuBIS Manual and Training Guide. The manual and training guide are available through the EuBIS homepage. In addition, EuBIS has developed educational material and to be used for seminars and courses. Based on regulatory standards applicable within the European Union (EU), the manual and training guide give references to commonly used internationals standards, such as GMP standards, the PIC/S guideline and the CoE (EDQM) guide. Thus, the EuBIS material should also be useful for those working in the field of quality management in other countries/areas world wide. In order to give practical assistance, the structure of the EuBIS guide follows critical aspects of quality management systems to be addressed in order to achieve good practice. For each of these critical points, a criterion description, examples evidence and references to relevant standards and legislative requirements are given. Conclusion The EuBIS manuals have been used by its partners organising national and international seminars, experimental and regulatory audits assisting the national implementation and further harmonisation of quality standards. In some member states elements of EuBIS have been adapted to national or local quality management systems. The implementation of good practice will improve the quality of blood and ensure that patients receiving blood transfusions are given safe blood.
EuBIS, the European blood inspection system, is a collaborative effort of 27 representatives from 19 Member States (MS), including governmental institutions, blood establishments and competent authorities. EuBIS has been initiated by co‐funding through the Public Health Programme (Directorate General Sanco) of the European Commission bringing together regulators (competent authorities) and manufacturers (blood establishments) to jointly develop criteria and standards aimed to assist: blood establishments in need to optimize their quality system and self‐inspection process and to prepare for regulatory inspections by competent authorities and competent authorities, who wish to use the manual and training guide as a reference for the implementation process of legislative requirements related to regulatory inspections. These standards and criteria have been published in a EuBIS Manual and a EuBIS Training Guide. The structure of the EuBIS training guide follows critical aspects of quality management to be addressed to achieve good/best practice. For each of the quality related critical points, a criterion description, examples evidence and references to relevant international standards (GMP, PIC/S and CoE/EDQM CD‐P‐TS) and legislative requirements based on the European blood directives are given. Using ‘fishbone’ diagrams, quality indicators for risk assessment can be easily developed in a systematic fashion covering all relevant activities of a blood establishment. Chapter 3·5 refers to Blood collection, testing and processing with detailed subchapters on blood collection, processing and validation, labelling and release of blood and blood components. Additional quality requirements are described in Chapter 3·3 for Premises (Collection, Processing, Storage and Distribution), Chapter 3·4 Equipment and Chapter 3·8 non‐conformance. Based on these standards and criteria, quality management systems have been nationally adapted to include reporting systems for risk analysis, prevention and acceptance based on deviations of processes, non conforming products and/or adverse events as well as non‐compliances from audits and regulatory inspections.
In the framework of a European Community (EC)-supported project, a survey of practices and attitudes towards quality assurance, inspection and accreditation in Blood Collection Establishments (BCEs) in the EC member states was carried out. Analysis of 352 responses to a structured questionnaire revealed a preference for national standards over international, and an introspective and reactive view to quality management. Four broad categories of operational performance in relation to safety were formed: initial, repeatable, managed and optimising, with the majority of responses (209) being characterized as initial. Although a direct relationship between the size of the BCE and the range and level of quality management practices is apparent in the data, further analysis shows that small BCEs have much higher ratio of personnel per blood unit collected/processed than large BCEs and thus seem to have an inherent potential for improvement. Overall, a clear preference for inspection and accreditation by professional peers at the national level was indicated.
Delphi technique is a method of structuring group communication and is useful in achieving consensus on goals, plans, or positions. The Delphi technique was used to determine a course of action to enhance cancer education at each of eight medical schools in Texas. Participants in this study were deans of medicine and a faculty member considered to be the lead cancer expert in the curriculum. A three-generation Delphi study was conducted with the deans using a telephone interview, a personal interview, and a conference of participants, including cancer experts. The Delphi technique was found to be an effective approach for increasing awareness of the statewide cancer plan, for involving all medical schools in achieving the goals of the plan, and for identifying means for enhancing cancer education at each medical school. A consensus was reached to develop a statewide standardized assessment of graduating medical students' knowledge about principles of cancer prevention and screening. The results could serve as a means of determining cancer education needs at each medical school.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.