The performances of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a group specific monoclonal antibody against bluetongue virus, an indirect ELISA and the standard agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test were compared in the detection of serum antibody against bluetongue virus. Test sera consisted of 1300 bovine, 530 ovine and 160 carpine samples from bluetongue-free areas of Canada, 605 bovine and ovine field samples from the USA and Barbados and 464 samples from 79 cattle and sheep experimentally infected with 19 South African and five USA serotypes of bluetongue virus. The diagnostic specificity of the competitive ELISA, as determined for the bluetongue virus-free cattle sera was superior (99.92 per cent) to that of the indirect ELISA (99.85 per cent) and the AGID (99.0 per cent). The specificities of the competitive ELISA for sheep (99.63 per cent) and goats (100.0 per cent) sera were also higher than those of the AGID test. The performance of the ELISA tests was similar whether a gamma-ray-irradiated (2.0 Mrad) or a non-irradiated bluetongue virus antigen preparation was used. The competitive ELISA results for bovine field sera from endemic areas demonstrated a relatively low level of agreement (92.04 per cent) with AGID test results, with 9.7 per cent false negatives. The possible presence in these sera of antibody to cross-reacting antigens or to other orbiviruses, eg, epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus, which react in the AGID but not in the competitive ELISA may account for this lack of agreement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
An indirect (1) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a competitive (C) ELISA, using a group-specific monoclonal antibody against bluetongue virus (BTV), are described for the detection of antibodies to BTV in cattle and sheep sera. The performance of these assays in detecting anti-BTV antibody in sequential serum samples and eluates from whole blood (WB) dried on filter paper from three calves and four sheep experimentally infected with type 10 BTV was evaluated. The C-ELISA was superior to the 1-ELISA in the detection of anti-BTV antibody in the sera and WB samples from both cattle and sheep early after infection with BTV. BTV antibodies were demonstrable by C-ELISA in ail the bovine and ovine sera and WB eluates by 9 days postinfection; whereas the 1-ELISA results for sheep sera and WB eluates were similar, anti-BTV antibody was not detected in bovine serum and WB eluates until 26 and 14 days postinfection, respectively. While both ELISAs proved reliable, under the present test conditions involving detection of early postinfection reactions of experimentally infected animals, the C-ELISA was always as sensitive or more sensitive than the standard agar gel immunodiffusion test, the modified complement fixation test, and the plaque neutralization tests in the detection of anti-BTV antibodies. Unlike observations with the immunodiffusion test, no reaction was seen between BTV antigen and bovine epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus antiserum in either ELISA. The results suggest that either ELISA may be suitable for routine diagnostic testing and may have the potential to replace other tests for detection of anti-BTV group-specific antibodies and that the C-ELISA may have the most potential.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.