Depletion of unconsolidated sand reservoirs can cause compaction of the reservoir sand. This strain transfers load to the casing. and this can kink and crush the casing, preventing workovers and requiring redrilling wells (Figure 1). Early redrilling can have significant negative impact on project earning power, so it is necessary to design casing to withstand compaction loading. This paper explains Shell Oil's new compaction design philosophy for casing to be run in some highly compactive Gulf of Mexico reservoirs. The paper explains the technical tools used to quantify compaction loading; the relative importance of different casing damage mechanisms; and Shell's approach to designing casing to mitigate the influence of compaction. Shell's approach to compaction emphasizes minimizing column buckling under axial compaction loads and collapse under transverse compaction loads. The approach to buckling is based on a model that quantifies the ability to work through buckled casing. The approach to collapse is based on a model linking depletion to the load transferred between the sand, cement, and casing. The compaction solution is specialized to Gulf of Mexico sand and reservoir characteristics. Casing design is only one aspect of the multidisciplinary solution to the compaction problem. Compaction-tolerant sand control must be included in the completion design, and advanced core testing must be used to link the casing design to the stress-strain behavior of unconsolidated sands. Where historical damage exists, downhole casing logging has been used to guide and validate the solution. These other facets of compaction technology go beyond the scope of this paper but have been addressed by Shell Oil's integrated approach to the compaction problem. Introduction to the Compaction Problem Depletion of the reservoir pressure increases the effective stress acting on the reservoir sand. For an unconsolidated sand, the increase in stress causes large compaction strain (several percent). This strain in the sand can cause corresponding severe deformation in the casing (Figure 1). The deformation does not breach the casing, but it prevents workovers and recompletions through the casing and requires costly redrilling of the well. For deep offshore wells, early casing damage at relatively low compaction strain can significantly decrease project earning power, so there is incentive to take early design steps to mitigate compaction-driven casing damage. The solution to this problem is to design casing, cement support, and sand control that are compaction resistant to a reasonable and practical degree. Doing this requires quantitative understanding of the damage mechanisms and the way that a specific amount of depletion strains the sand and deforms the casing. The solution also requires quantitative understanding of the parameters that affect the ability of the casing to resist compaction loading. Blind overdesign of the casing is not a viable solution. Overdesign is ineffective if a critical damage mechanism is overlooked. Overdesign also can have unacceptable economic cost (how much collapse strength is enough?) and unacceptable increased risk to the completion design, the well inflow, or the clearances between tight strings run inside one another. In order to develop a guideline for design of casing in compacting reservoirs, Shell used a combination of finite element analysis and analytical modeling to quantify and rank damage mechanisms as functions of depletion, sand compaction tendency. cement placement, well angle, and casing D/T ratio and grade. Compaction is not new, and much work has been done on this topic. Much work has dealt with shallow reservoirs where compaction leads to surface subsidence. This is an ancient problem (e.g., aquifer depletion). and References 2–11 are only a few examples of work in this area. P. 731
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.