SUMMARYTHIS ARTICLE is a survey of the treatment of the sick poor in the counties of Berkshire, Essex, and Oxfordshire from c. 1720 to 1834 based on parish records. Its general argument is that the sick poor received sympathetic and humane consideration bearing in mind contemporary medical knowledge and the limited facilities available.General medical aid is first considered -broken limbs, midwifery, eye complaints, etc. This is followed by a section on the use of provincial hospitals and those in London. Parishes readily availed themselves of these institutions and it is suggested that they were not as great a menace as has been often maintained. The role of the dispensaries is also considered. A short section follows on the treatment ofthe mentally deranged pauper and the use of private asylums. A brief comment is made on the medical contract system. The problem of smallpox in the parishes is examined. It is argued that the effects of the disease were so serious and the use of inoculation so widespread, particularly in the rural areas -that this treatment might well have had some effect on mortality trends in the second half of the eighteenth century. Vaccination also became very popular in the parishes after the first decade of the nineteenth century. This, it is also maintained, made an important contribution to mortality trends -particularly when local authorities were able to treat the whole of the poor.The action against typhus and cholera is then considered. Examples are cited of progressive authorities who made strenuous attempts to secure a healthier environment and which might, in a small way, have made a contribution towards improving the health of the local communities.A concluding section attempts to compare the achievements in these three counties with findings in other areas and makes some tentative conclusions. Much more work of this nature clearly needs to be carried out at local level before an overall and definitive picture emerges.
Compulsory civil commitment programs typically provide narcotic addicts the understanding that they will be given an early discharge and have their criminal charges dismissed as rewards for successful program participation. These understandings can be viable incentives for the addicts to cooperate in their own rehabilitation only if they are honored. California's Civil Addict Program had returned 2,647 cases to court for such a discharge, but the courts' response had not been determined. This study found that California's courts seem to be honoring the understanding. Of the persons returned to court during one three-month period, criminal charges were dismissed for 93%, who would therefore suffer no loss of civil rights. Decisions seemed to be made on factors directly related to narcotics addiction rather than on prior criminal history.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.