JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . The MIT Press and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the editors of The Journal of Interdisciplinary History are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Interdisciplinary History. PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions REVIEWS J 317 useful corrective for this caricature, she suggests, by allowing us to examine at close hand some examples of individuals and communities that responded variously to the introduction of government welfare programs and scientific medical procedures.In deciphering the attitudes of French peasants in her chosen region, Ackerman is handicapped by a lack of testimonial evidence (she was able to locate only one peasant diary, in which the principal expressed concern was, understandably, the weather). Yet official records in departmental and hospital archives enabled her to document popular reactions to cholera, smallpox, tuberculosis, and other infections. She confirms that most French men and women of the early nineteenth century were skeptical of change, fearful of hospitals and inoculations, and inclined to avoid contact with physicians. But the bacteriological revolution and the legislation of free medical care in 1893 began to alter perceptions. Ackerman finds the French peasantry not nearly so benighted and recalcitrant as some scholars have supposed.2 Rather, villagers learned to pick and choose among the many options of medical care that became increasingly available. The exaggerations ofFoucaultian theory are therefore attenuated, she argues, by the details of actual practice. This history from below-or, at least, from outside Paristhus concludes that traditional notions of health and hygiene may die hard, but they do die.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.