The objective of the study was to explore whether challenging experiences on development programmes would simulate leadership challenges and therefore stimulate the body's autonomic nervous system response. We also aimed to determine whether increase in autonomic arousal would be related to learning, and/or moderated by personality variables. Design/methodology/approach The research used heart rate monitors to measure heart rate continuously over a two-day simulated learning experience. This was used to calculate autonomic arousal which was taken to be the difference between resting heart rate measured during sleep (HR) and HR during critical incidents (∆HR). We correlated this with selfreports of learning immediately after, and one month after, the programme to assess the impact of autonomic arousal on perceived learning, as well as with variety of psychometric measures. Findings The research found significant correlations between (∆HR) during critical incidents and perceived learning which were not related to personality type. The research also found a significant correlation between (∆HR) and learning during a control event for individuals with 'approach' personalities. Research limitations Whilst a significant result was found, the sample size of 28 was small. The research also did not empirically assess the valence or intensity of the emotions experienced, and used only a self-report measure of learning. Future research should replicate the findings with a larger sample size, attempt to measure these emotional dimensions, as well as obtain perceptions of learning from direct reports and line managers. Originality / value The research extends the literature regarding the value of learning through experience, the role of autonomic arousal on learning, and the impact of negative emotions on cognition. The research makes a unique contribution by exploring the impact of experience on arousal and learning in a simulated learning experience and over time, by demonstrating that simulated experiences induce emotional and physiological responses, and that these experiences are associated with increased learning.
This paper argues that management practices are more readily portable across the sectors than has often been supposed, while indicating where particular care will be needed in translation. The paper suggests, however, that political pressure for control and an epistemological bias may prove to be management's Achilles heel. Further, it examines some dilemmas in the relationship between the manager and the managed, and queries the professions' outrage at being subject to increasingly overt management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.