Multiple common and sporadic sequence variations including 14 new alleles at FUT1, FUT2, and FUT3 loci were identified. Four novel mutations result in amino acid substitution in the protein. Three of them are predicted to have adverse effects on the enzyme activity. A novel nonsecretor allele was found.

Background: Besides anemia, iron deficiency may cause more subtle symptoms, including the restless legs syndrome (RLS), the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) or sleeping disorders. Objective: The aim of this pre-planned secondary analysis of the IronWoMan randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the frequency and severity of symptoms associated with iron deficiency before and after (intravenous or oral) iron supplementation in iron deficient blood donors. Methods/Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-centre trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01787526). Setting: Tertiary care center in Graz, Austria. Participants: 176 (138 female and 38 male) whole-blood and platelet apheresis donors aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years with iron deficiency (ferritin ≤ 30ng/mL at the time of blood donation). Interventions: Intravenous iron (1 g ferric carboxymaltose, n = 86) or oral iron supplementation (10 g iron fumarate, 100 capsules, n = 90). Measurements: Clinical symptoms were evaluated by a survey before iron therapy (visit 0, V0) and after 8–12 weeks (visit 1, V1), including questions about symptoms of restless legs syndrome (RLS), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), sleeping disorders, quality of life and symptoms like headaches, dyspnoea, dizziness, palpitations, pica and trophic changes in fingernails or hair. Results: We found a significant improvement in the severity of symptoms for RLS, fatigue and sleep quality (p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant decrease in headaches, dyspnoea, dizziness and palpitations was reported (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the type of iron supplementation (intravenous versus oral) and clinical outcome data. Conclusion: Iron supplementation in iron-deficient blood donors may be an effective strategy to improve symptoms related to iron deficiency and the wellbeing of blood donors.

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) targets the respiratory and gastric epithelium, causing coronavirus disease 2019 . Tissue antigen expression variations influence host susceptibility to many infections. This study aimed to investigate the closely linked Lewis (FUT3) and ABO histo-blood types, including secretor (FUT2) status, to infections with SARS-CoV-2 and the corresponding severity of COVID-19.Study Design and Methods: Patients (Caucasians, n = 338) were genotyped for ABO, FUT3, and FUT2, and compared to a reference population of blood donors (n = 250,298). The association between blood types and severity of COVID-19 was addressed by dividing patients into four categories: hospitalized individuals in general wards, patients admitted to the intensive care unit with and without intubation, and deceased patients. Comorbidities were considered in subsequent analyses. Results: Patients with blood type Lewis (aÀbÀ) or O were significantly less likely to be hospitalized (odds ratio [OR] 0.669, confidence interval [CI] 0.446-0.971, OR 0.710, CI 0.556-0.900, respectively), while type AB was significantly more prevalent in the patient cohort (OR 1.519, CI 1.014-2.203). The proportions of secretors/nonsecretors, and Lewis a+ or Lewis b+ types were consistent between patients and controls. The analyzed blood groups were not associated with the clinical outcome as defined.Discussion: Blood types Lewis (aÀbÀ) and O were found to be protective factors, whereas the group AB is suggested to be a risk factor for COVID-19. The antigens investigated may not be prognostic for disease severity, but a role for ABO isoagglutinins in SARS-CoV-2 infections is strongly suggested.

BACKGROUND Blood group A and B antigens are synthesized by glycosyltransferases regulated by a complex molecular genetic background. A multibase deletion in the ABO gene was identified in two related blood donors. To define its hereditary character and to evaluate genotype–phenotype associations, a detailed study including 30 family members was conducted. METHODS AND MATERIALS ABO phenotyping was performed with agglutination techniques and adsorption‐elution tests. The secretor status was determined. Allele‐specific sequencing of ABO and genotyping of family members by a mutation‐specific polymerase chain reaction were carried out. Functional analysis included cloning of complementary DNA and transfection experiments in HeLa cells. The antigen expression was investigated by flow cytometry and adsorption‐elution method. RESULTS Sequencing analysis revealed a 24‐bp deletion in Exon 5 and the adjacent intronic region of ABO. The alteration was inherited by 16 family members. Nine of them being heterozygous for the mutated allele failed to express A antigen on their erythrocytes as found by routine typing. In particular samples, however, adsorption‐elution studies indicated inconclusive results. HeLa cells transfected with aberrant gene transcripts did not express blood group antigen A. CONCLUSION The variation causes defects in messenger RNA splicing, most likely inactivating the transferase as observed by serological typing and in vitro expression analysis. These data suggest a novel mechanism associated with blood group O and extend the knowledge of exceptionally rare ABO splice site mutations and deletions. With increased understanding of the molecular bases of ABO, the diagnostics may be further enhanced to ensure the safest possible use of the blood supply.

Because the novel allele was associated with a well-described O allele, the absence of A-antigens in the inherited ABO subtype phenotype may be due to the identified mutation affecting the transmembrane-spanning domain of the encoded protein and impairing the transferase activity.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract