We analyzed Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC) data on a series of 1,124,654 consecutive births to study congenital eye malformations from an epidemiological standpoint. We studied their frequencies as well as some causal and clinical aspects. Four hundred fourteen infants had eye malformations, for an overall prevalence of 3.68/10,000 newborns. Most frequent were: anophthalmia/microphthalmia (21.34/100,000), congenital cataract (6.31), coloboma (4.89), corneal opacity (3.11), and congenital glaucoma (2.85). In our data, the tendency of eye malformations to be associated with other congenital abnormalities is evident (only 21.01% of cases were isolated). Eye defects are heterogeneous, since we have observed them in clinical patterns with all modes of inheritance or caused by different environmental agents. Chromosomal syndromes represent 60% of total syndromes, followed by syndromes of autosomal-recessive inheritance (15%), environmental syndromes (10%), autosomal-dominant syndromes (5.83%), and other types which have a lower frequency. Regarding defects associated with eye malformations, most frequent are limb anomalies (affecting 59.3% of multiply malformed cases), auricular/facial (47.1%), central nervous system (42.5%), osteomuscular excluding limbs (42.2%), genital defects (30.6%), oral clefts (29.4%), and the rest of the body systems, which are less frequent. Using the method outlined by Prieto and Martínez-Frías [1996: Am J Med Genet 62:61-67], it was demonstrated that the association of coloboma and anophthalmia/microphthalmia was specific, as was the combination of cataract and anophthalmia/microphthalmia, and that of anophthalmia/microphthalmia with holoprosencephaly. From these statistical associations some pathogenetic relationships in human embryos can be inferred, supporting several previously proposed mechanisms.

Our objective was to evaluate the frequency and type of malformations associated with gastroschisis in a large pool of international data, to identify malformation patterns, and to evaluate the role of maternal age in non-isolated cases. Case-by-case information from 24 registries, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR), were evaluated. After the exclusion of other abdominal wall defects cases were classified as: (a) isolated; (b) recognizable syndrome, chromosomal or not; (c) multiple congenital anomalies (MCA). Our results showed that out of 3,322 total cases 469 non-isolated cases were registered (14.1%): 41 chromosomal syndromes, 24 other syndromes, and 404 MCA. Among MCA four groups of anomalies were most frequent: CNS (4.5%), cardio-vascular (2.5%), limb (2.2%), and kidney anomalies (1.9%). No similar patterns emerged except two patterns resembling limb-body wall complex and OEIS. In both of them the gastroschisis could be however misclassified. Chromosomal trisomies and possibly non-syndromic MCA are associated with an older maternal age more than isolated cases. On consideration of our data and the most valid studies published in the literature, the best estimate of the proportion of gastroschisis associated with major unrelated defects is about 10%, with a few cases associated to recognizable syndromes. Recognized syndromes with gastroschisis seem to be so exceptional that the well documented and validated cases are worth being published as interesting case report. An appropriate case definition in etiological studies should include only isolated gastroschisis after an appropriate definition of isolated and non-isolated cases and a thorough case-by-case review.

Exstrophy of the bladder (EB) and exstrophy of the cloaca (EC) are generally recognizable as distinct clinical entities. In patients with EB, the posterior bladder wall is exposed through a midline defect of the abdomen. The umbilicus is inferiorly displaced and located close to the superior margin of the exstrophic bladder. Genital abnormalities are common in boys and girls who may present epispadias and a small, split phallus or a split clitoris, a bifid uterus, and a duplicate or exstrophic vagina. In contrast to classic EB, EC is commonly associated with omphalocele, spinal defects, and incompletely formed external genitalia and is always associated with imperforate anus. Some authors state that EC and EB constitute two distinct disorders, but others consider them part of a "continuum," representing different levels of severity within the same spectrum. The use of the acronym OEIS to refer to the combination of omphalocele, exstrophy, imperforate anus, and spinal defects, in our opinion, has not helped to clarify the clinical definition, pathogenesis, or cause of this multiple congenital anomaly (MCA) pattern, mostly because the term makes no distinction between EC or EB. Here we present the epidemiological analysis of a group of characteristics in infants with EC and infants with EB to determine if they constitute two different entities. We also analyze if the different combinations of omphalocele, imperforate anus, and spinal defects are more frequent in infants with EC than in infants with MCA patterns other than EC and EB. The prevalence in our data for EC was 1:200,233 live births and 1:35,597 for EB. The clinical analysis indicated that the study defects (omphalocele, spine defects, spina bifida, and imperforate anus) tend to occur together in the same child with a higher frequency if the child has the EC defect than in infants with MCA patterns that did not include EC or EB. Our findings of low birth weight, twinning, single umbilical artery, and preferentially associated malformations suggest that EC is the result of damage occurring very early in development and that EC and EB are two different expressions of a primary polytopic developmental field defect.

The association between maternal diabetes mellitus and congenital defects has been well documented. However, few data exist on the potential teratogenic effect of gestational diabetes (GD). We analyzed 19,577 consecutive infants with malformations of unknown cause and compared the offspring of mothers with GD with those of nondiabetic mothers. The children with each of 20 types of selected anomalies among the two groups were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR). Because we used as a reference group for each congenital defect the rest of malformed infants, the value of the OR gives us the specificity between the association of GD and each congenital defect. Our analysis strongly supports the suggestion that GD is a significant risk for holoprosencephaly, upper/lower spine/rib, and renal and urinary system anomalies. GD is a heterogeneous disorder, which includes previously unrecognized and newly diagnosed nongestational diabetes mellitus (DM). Thus, it is possible that the teratogenic effect is related to latent DM. However, because it is not possible at this time to differentiate between these situations, pregnancies complicated by GD should be considered at risk for congenital anomalies. Prenatal ultrasound examination should be aimed particularly at the detection of abnormalities of the central nervous system, the renal and urinary system, and the spine/rib developmental field.

This study was aimed at analyzing the effect of mutations in three non-synonymous SNP genes (677C > T and 1298A > C of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene, and 66A > G in the MTRR gene) on total plasmatic homocysteine (Hcy), in 91 mothers of Down syndrome (DS) infants and 90 control mothers. The comparison of both groups of mothers is a new way to determine if those mutations and their interactions increase the risk for DS. Material came from the case-control network of the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC). Using a general lineal model in a backwards step, we performed the analyses including the different mutations, maternal age, the fact that each mother had a DS or a control infant, and all possible interactions of these variables, in the models, being maternal Hcy the continuous dependent variable. In another model, maternal folic acid intake during the third trimester of pregnancy was added. The results from both models were essentially the same: Hcy levels variability differs from case mothers to control ones, the presence of the MTHFR1298A > C polymorphism also affects significantly the Hcy variance, as it does the statistical interaction between the mutations MTRR66A > G and MTHFR1298A > C in the mother. In this sense, the interaction between different polymorphisms may totally modify their individual effects, and some of those effects are different in mothers of DS children and in controls' mothers. For instance, only two mutations in MTRR66 (GGAA) in mothers of control infants increase the reference maternal Hcy level in 4.66 units, and the individual effect of the genotype with only two mutations in the MTHFR1298 gene (AACC) increases the reference Hcy level in 12.74 units. However, the presence of the four mutations (GGCC) interacts giving a statistically significant decrease in 6.00 units in the level of Hcy in control mothers. On the contrary, in mothers of DS infants, the sole presence of two mutations in one of these two genes decreases the levels of Hcy (-2.31 units for GGAA genotype, and -3.43 units for AACC genotype), while the presence of the four mutations (GGCC) increases Hcy in 9.53 units. Taking into consideration that in the one-carbon metabolism cystathionine beta-synthase (CBS) catalyzes Hcy in an irreversible way, and that CBS gene is located in chromosome 21, fetuses and infants with DS have functional folate deficiency due to overexpression of CBS. This fact, as well as others influencing Hcy levels (such as nutrients interactions and lifestyle), together with the fetal genotype, suggest that their relationship with DS could be through an effect on fetal survival up to birth. Three possible mechanisms are considered by evaluating the results in the light of the present knowledge on cytology and molecular biology.