This paper comprises brief descriptions by faculty at 13 veterinary schools in Europe, North America, South America, and Australasia that summarize undergraduate training in animal welfare at the respective schools and how students are assessed.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of urbanization in the Czech Republic upon the co-existence of domesticated dogs and their owners. We divided the data from a questionnaire (distributed to dog owners) into rural (R, n = 164) and urban (U, n = 132). The former group comprised of dogs living in family houses with yards/gardens, the latter comprised of dogs kept in urban apartments without yards or gardens. The data were evaluated by chi-square test.The differences in living conditions of R and U dogs were derivative of different structures of the respective households. In the R group, 3.7% of dogs lived in one-person households, 42.9% in two-person, and 53.4% in households with more than two persons. By contrast in U households more dogs lived in one-person households (6.9%), 58.8% in two-member, but fewer (34.4%) lived in households with more members. In R households, more frequently other dogs also were living (R = 60.1%, U = 32.1%; χ 2 =22.929, df = 1; p < 0.001), and a linear association was found with the larger number of children and cats and other animals in the house.Although the physical and social pressures upon the U group of dogs, based on permanent dwelling in small niches of urban apartments, were very strong (Czech apartments are comfortable, but smaller than in many other European countries), we found significant changes in 23 (27.1%) of 86 behavioural traits analyzed. Among them, however, only 6 (14.6%) from among 41 traits concerned behaviours of dogs (using the furniture, sleeping in beds of family members, mounting people, growling at family members, perceiving the moods of owners, showing fear, and destroying garden less frequently). The remaining 44 traits under study concerned the behaviour of owners/family members. In this category we found 17 significant differences. Their proportion was more than 2.5 times greater (i.e. 38.6%) than that of differences in the behaviour of dogs.We concluded that although the characteristics of co-existence of people and their dogs under study have different biological significance, it is obvious that in the urbanized environment of the Czech society, as this co-existence became more intense, the contacts between people and their dogs became more intimate. Furthermore, household members changed their behaviour (i.e., showed more changes in their conduct) more than their dogs. This transformation of behaviour notwithstanding, with even more rapid urbanization of human society, dogs are still viewed as desirable and suitable companions for humans. No doubt, this is because dogs possess an outstanding social cognition vis-á-vis people and even in an urban environment they are able to adapt and thrive under new conditions of the inter-species co-existence, i.e., contributing to the human-animal bond. Behavioural traits, rural and urban living, questionnaire, human-animal bondDogs, our most ancient companions, nowadays accompany humans around the globe, under the most diverse life conditions (Matter and Daniels 2000), including relatively recen...
The epidemiology of bite wounds in dogs that resulted from intraspecies conflicts and were treated at the Small Animal Clinic, Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno was evaluated from 246 records in 1989-90 and 337 records in 1998-99. The number of bite incidents fluctuated during the year. The majority of incidents occurred in summer months, i.e. in the second (n = 149) and third (n = 193) trimester of the year. In comparison, only 119 and 122 bite victims were treated in winter months, i.e. in the first and fourth trimester, respectively. The total number of bite victims increased (p < 0.01) between the first and the second period under study. Most treated dogs belonged to small (37.9%), and large (24.8%) breeds, followed by medium-sized (19.0%), giant (11%) and toy breeds (7.3%). A high proportion of the victims were 1 year (11.4%) and 2 years (15.6%) of age, and the proportion decreased with age down to 1% at 11 years. Also, there were indicators for a sex effect. Of the 571 cases where the dog´s sex was recorded 176 concerned a female (30.3%) and 405 (69.7%) a male. For 503 dogs the positions of the wounds were recorded. A large portion of the wounds was administered to the thorax (26.6%) and head (24.30%), i.e. the frontal body parts. More than one fourth of all head wounds were in the relatively small areas around the eyes (28.7%). Fewer bites were on the limbs (17.7%), neck (17.3%) and in the abdominal regions (14.3%). These data suggest that for dogs the risk of being wounded by a conspecific differs between seasons and depends on a dog´s age, sex and body size.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the behaviour of dogs of various ages as viewed by their owners in the Czech Republic. The data were obtained in a questionnaire. The dogs were divided by age as follows: 35 animals younger than one year (Y), 220 middle-aged dogs (M), and 12 dogs, seniors (S) older than 8 years (giant and large breed dogs were included in this group at 8 years, medium at 10 years, and small and toy breeds at 12 years of age). The following significant differences were found: young dogs were destructive (household items and gardens), they eliminated in the house more frequently and mounted people. They were fed more than twice a day, and were never described as nervous. Middle-aged dogs were more often than others described as dominant and were given treats. Old dogs were most frequently described as nervous, sometimes difficult to control, and excessively barking, whining and howling. On the other hand, they were more often described as protective of the house and household members, and they were most often walked unleashed. These differences are in agreement with earlier data on the ontogeny of dog behaviour, and show some changes in the co-existence of people and dogs of various ages in Czech households. Importantly, they serve as a basic information about behaviour problems that may be encountered in veterinary practice and show a need for client education programmes and preventive behavioural medicine in the country. Young, middle-aged, old dogs, development, behavioural traits, questionnaireThe behaviour of an individual changes in the course of its life. In past decades this fact was reflected in a scientific concept of the postnatal development of behaviour in dogs divided into several periods (Scott and Marston 1950;Scott 1962). The first, postnatal period lasting two weeks, is characterized by total dependence on mother for food, temperature regulation, and elimination. The puppies spend about 90% time sleeping, and their social contacts are limited to mother. It is followed by transitional period (days 15-28) with eyes and ears opening, locomotion changing from crawling to walking and gradually less dependence on mother for food and elimination. Social contacts with mother and littermates increase in freguency and complexity. In the following socialization period between weeks 4 and 12 or 14, also weaning occurs. This period is characterized by seeking other social contacts and is behaviorally the most important stage in dog´s life (Houpt 1991;Beaver 1999). Juvenile period (3 rd to 6 th month of age) with rapid growth gradually turns into puberty around 10 months of age, then into adulthood, the relatively longest life period. It is followed by senescence the onset of which is still difficult to assess. In past decades, dozens of different tests have been described for evaluation of biological age, especially in humans. They consist mostly of variables characterizing the development of physiological functions and statistically analyzed. They are directed towards the causal scheme: m...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.