Hemangiomas are benign tumors originating in the vascular tissues of skin, mucosa, muscles, glands, and bones. Although these tumors are common lesions of the head and neck, they rarely occur in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Cavernous haemangioma of the lateral wall of the nasopharynx has not previously been reported. We examined the clinical, radiological and therapeutic management of cavernous haemangioma of nasopharynx starting from a clinical case of a 26-year-old woman with a history of recurrent and conspicuous epistaxis and left-sided nasal associated severe obstruction. Nasopharynx examination, by flexible endoscopy, showed a cystic mass borne by the left side wall of the nasopharynx, in contact with the soft palate, covered by intact and regular mucosa. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan, confirmed these findings and showed contextual lamellar calcifications and inhomogeneous enhancement. The nasal endoscopic approach (FESS), under general anesthesia, allowed removal of the mass, without complications, after careful hemostasis of arterial branches. It was possible to establish the precise site of origin of the tumor only during the surgical procedure. Histopathological study showed mucosa with extensive vascular proliferation, with framework of lacunar/cavernous haemangioma, also present at lamellar bone tissue level. An unusual site and an unspecific clinical appearance can make diagnosis and treatment of a cavernous hemangioma of the nasopharynx difficult. The nasal endoscopic technique proved to be reliable in terms of adequate exposure and visualization of the lesion, control of bleeding, and complete removal of the mass.

No abstract

During COVID-19 pandemic, clinicians have had to deal with an ever-increasing number of cases of olfactory disturbances after SARS-CoV-2 infections and in some people this problem persisted for long time after negativization from virus. This a prospective randomized controlled trial aims at evaluating the efficacy of ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and Luteolin (LUT) (umPEA-LUT) and olfactory training (OT) compared to OT alone for the treatment of smell disorders in Italian post-COVID population. We included patients with smell loss and parosmia who were randomized and assigned to Group 1 (intervention group; daily treatment with umPEA-LUT oral supplement and OT) or Group 2 (control group; daily treatment with placebo and OT). All subjects were treated for 90 consecutive days. The Sniffin’ Sticks identification test was used to assess the olfactory functions at the baseline (T0) and the end of the treatment (T1). Patients were queried regarding any perception of altered olfaction (parosmia) or aversive smell, such as cacosmia, gasoline-type smell, or otherwise at the same observational points. This study confirmed the efficacy of combination of umPEA-LUT and olfactory training as treatment of quantitative smell alteration COVID-19 related, but the efficacy of the supplement for parosmia was limited. UmpEA-LUT is useful for the treatment of brain neuro-inflammation (origin of quantity smell disorders) but has limited/no effect on peripheral damage (olfactory nerve, neuro-epithelium) that is responsible of quality disorders.

Extracapsular dissection (ECD) was introduced for the removal of superficial and small benign parotid tumors. According to a recent proposal, ECD is reserved for tumors that are 3 cm or less, mobile, and close to the parotid borders in cases of pleomorphic adenoma. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ECD for treatment of benign parotid tumors also in cases of tumors that were larger than 3 cm and deeper. All ECD for benign parotid neoplasms conducted between 2007 and 2017 were reviewed. The lesions included were limited to primary parotid tumors and categorized by Quer proposal. Facial nerve monitoring was used in all cases. Facial nerve palsy and local recurrences were assessed. The 88 ECD performed met inclusion criteria. The mean lesion size was 4.26 cm. Of the tumors, 68 were less than 3 cm in diameter and 20 were larger, 64 were superficial, and 24 were deep. The most common lesion types were pleomorphic adenoma (88.6%). There was no significant difference in complication rates between the size of tumor (p = 0.9) and location (p = 0.91). Our results suggest that extracapsular dissection could be considered an option for first-time diagnosed benign parotid tumors, even in cases of large dimensions and deep lobe involvement.

Patient: Female, 24-year-old Final Diagnosis: Hemangioendothelioma Symptoms: Swelling Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Otolaryngology • Surgery Objective: Rare disease Background: Masson’s tumor, also known as IPEH (intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia), is a rare benign vascular process, comprising approximately 2% of vascular tumors of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. IPEH presenting as a neck mass is rare, with only 5 reports of anterior neck mass and 7 cases of lateral neck lesions, of which 1 was in an external jugular vein aneurysm. To the best of our knowledge, the localization of intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia in the supraclavicular region is rarely reported. Case Report: We describe our management of a non-traumatic and non-painful mass on the right supraclavicular region in 24-year-old woman. Ultrasound revealed a heterogeneously hypoechoic mass with intense vascularization. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a formation with lobulated contours and closely related to muscular layers of serratus anterior muscle. The findings of ultrasound-guided biopsy (FNA) were inconclusive. Complete removal of the mass was performed. Histopathological examination showed a well-circumscribed lesion with numerous small papillary structures. The papillae had hyalinized hypocellular cores covered by flattened endothelium. Immunohistochemical analysis showed endothelial positivity for CD34 and CD31. These features are typical of IPEH. No recurrence had occurred at 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: The differential diagnosis of malignant tumors like angiosarcoma is important because the prognosis significantly differs. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice. In our experience, the size of the lesion and its critical landmarks have not influenced the outcomes of the surgical procedure in terms of potential functional damages.