The presence of sulfur in cofactors has been appreciated for over a century, but the trafficking and delivery of sulfur to cofactors and nucleosides is still not fully understood. In the last decade, great strides have been made toward understanding those processes and the enzymes that conduct them, including cysteine desulfurases and rhodanese homology domain proteins. The persulfide group (R-S-SH) predominantly serves as the sulfur donor, and sulfur incorporation pathways share enzymes to a remarkable degree. Mechanisms for the use of persulfide groups are illustrated with the relatively simple case of 4-thiourdine generation, and further possibilities are illuminated by the 2-thiouridine and cofactor biosynthetic systems. The rationale and ramifications of sharing enzymes between sulfur incorporation pathways are discussed, including implications for interpreting genetic or genomic data that indicate a role for a sulfur transfer protein in a particular biological process.

ThiI is an enzyme common to the biosynthetic pathways leading to both thiamin and 4-thiouridine in tRNA.Comparison of the ThiI sequence with protein sequences in the data bases revealed that the Escherichia coli enzyme contains a C-terminal extension displaying sequence similarity to the sulfurtransferase rhodanese. Cys-456 of ThiI aligns with the active site cysteine residue of rhodanese that transiently forms a persulfide during catalysis. We investigated the functional importance of this sequence similarity and discovered that, like rhodanese, ThiI catalyzes the transfer of sulfur from thiosulfate to cyanide. Mutation of Cys-456 to alanine impairs this sulfurtransferase activity, and the C456A ThiI is incapable of supporting generation of 4-thiouridine in tRNA both in vitro and in vivo. We therefore conclude that Cys-456 of ThiI is critical for activity and propose that Cys-456 transiently forms a persulfide during catalysis. To accommodate this hypothesis, we propose a general mechanism for sulfur transfer in which the terminal sulfur of the persulfide first acts as a nucleophile and is then transferred as an equivalent of S 2؊ rather than S 0 .

The enzyme ThiI is common to the biosynthetic pathways leading to both thiamin and 4-thiouridine in tRNA. We earlier noted the presence of a motif shared with sulfurtransferases, and we reported that the cysteine residue (Cys-456 of Escherichia coli ThiI) found in this motif is essential for activity (Palenchar, P. M., Buck, C. J., Cheng, H., Larson, T. J., and Mueller, E. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 8283-8286). In light of that finding and the report of the involvement of the protein IscS in the reaction (Kambampati, R., and Lauhon, C. T. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 16561-16568), we proposed two mechanisms for the sulfur transfer mediated by ThiI, and both suggested possible involvement of the thiol group of another cysteine residue in ThiI. We have now substituted each of the cysteine residues with alanine and characterized the effect on activity in vivo and in vitro. Cys-108 and Cys-202 were converted to alanine with no significant effect on ThiI activity, and C207A ThiI was only mildly impaired. Substitution of Cys-344, the only cysteine residue conserved among all sequenced ThiI, resulted in the loss of function in vivo and a 2700-fold reduction in activity measured in vitro. We also examined the possibility that ThiI contains an iron-sulfur cluster or disulfide bonds in the resting state, and we found no evidence to support the presence of either species. We propose that Cys-344 forms a disulfide bond with Cys-456 during turnover, and we present evidence that a disulfide bond can form between these two residues in native ThiI and that disulfide bonds do form in ThiI during turnover. We also discuss the relevance of these findings to the biosynthesis of thiamin and iron-sulfur clusters.The metabolism of many sulfur-containing biomolecules remains incompletely understood. Among the metabolic pathways requiring further elucidation are those leading to ironsulfur clusters (1-5), biotin (6 -8), molybdopterin (9), lipoic acid (10), thiamin (8, 11), and sulfur-containing bases in RNA (12). The sulfur-containing nucleosides include 4-thiouridine (s 4 U), 1 which is found at position 8 of some bacterial tRNA ( Fig. 1) and serves as a photosensor for near-UV light (12). The s 4 U undergoes a photoactivated 2 ϩ 2 cycloaddition with cytidine 13 when the tRNA is exposed to light of a wavelength similar to the 334 nm absorbance maximum of s 4 U (13-15). The resulting cross-linked tRNA are poor aminoacylation substrates (16), and the accumulation of uncharged tRNA arrests growth by triggering the stringent response (17, 18). Lipsett and co-workers (19,20) investigated the enzymology of s 4 U biosynthesis in Escherichia coli and reported that the overall reaction utilized cysteine as the sulfur donor and required ATP as a substrate. Lipsett and co-workers (20) concluded that two enzymes were required and that one of them also plays a role in thiamin biosynthesis and requires the cofactor PLP for activity (21,22). By using a genetic screen based on the role of s 4 U as a photosensor (18,(22)(23)(24), the genetic loci of two ...

RluA is a dual-specificity enzyme responsible for pseudouridylating 23S rRNA and several tRNAs. The 2.05 A resolution structure of RluA bound to a substrate RNA comprising the anticodon stem loop of tRNA(Phe) reveals that enzyme binding induces a dramatic reorganization of the RNA. Instead of adopting its canonical U turn conformation, the anticodon loop folds into a new structure with a reverse-Hoogsteen base pair and three flipped-out nucleotides. Sequence conservation, the cocrystal structure, and the results of structure-guided mutagenesis suggest that RluA recognizes its substrates indirectly by probing RNA loops for their ability to adopt the reorganized fold. The planar, cationic side chain of an arginine intercalates between the reverse-Hoogsteen base pair and the bottom pair of the anticodon stem, flipping the nucleotide to be modified into the active site of RluA. Sequence and structural comparisons suggest that pseudouridine synthases of the RluA, RsuA, and TruA families employ an equivalent arginine for base flipping.

The pseudouridine synthases catalyze the isomerization of uridine to pseudouridine at particular positions in certain RNA molecules. Genomic data base searches and sequence alignments using the first four identified pseudouridine synthases led Koonin (Koonin, E. V. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2411-2415) and, independently, Santi and co-workers (Gustafsson, C., Reid, R., Greene, P. J., and Santi, D. V. (1996) Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 3756 -3762) to group this class of enzyme into four families, which display no statistically significant global sequence similarity to each other. Upon further scrutiny (Huang, H. L., Pookanjanatavip, M., Gu, X. G., and Santi, D. V. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 344 -351), the Santi group discovered that a single aspartic acid residue is the only amino acid present in all of the aligned sequences; they then demonstrated that this aspartic acid residue is catalytically essential in one pseudouridine synthase. To test the functional significance of the sequence alignments in light of the global dissimilarity between the pseudouridine synthase families, we changed the aspartic acid residue in representatives of two additional families to both alanine and cysteine: the mutant enzymes are catalytically inactive but retain the ability to bind tRNA substrate. We have also verified that the mutant enzymes do not release uracil from the substrate at a rate significant relative to turnover by the wild-type pseudouridine synthases. Our results clearly show that the aligned aspartic acid residue is critical for the catalytic activity of pseudouridine synthases from two additional families of these enzymes, supporting the predictive power of the sequence alignments and suggesting that the sequence motif containing the aligned aspartic acid residue might be a prerequisite for pseudouridine synthase function.All organisms chemically modify their RNA after transcription, and the isomerization of uridine to its C-glycoside isomer pseudouridine (⌿) 1 is the most prevalent modification, Fig. 1 (1). This isomerization is catalyzed by the pseudouridine synthases, enzymes that display specificity for U residues at particular positions in certain RNA molecules, a specificity that can range from handling a single specific site to mild promiscuity (2-7). Physiological ramifications resulting from the lack of ⌿ at particular locations have recently become evident, mandating a fuller understanding of ⌿ generation in particular and RNA modification generally.In Escherichia coli, severe growth inhibition results from disruption of rluD (formerly denoted sfhB or yfiI), which encodes the ⌿ synthase responsible for isomerization of U residues at positions 1911, 1915, and 1917 of 23 S rRNA (6, 7). In eukaryotes, Steitz and co-workers (8) have elegantly demonstrated that the presence of ⌿ in the U2 small nuclear RNA is required for proper assembly of the spliceosome, work that relied on the inhibition of the responsible ⌿ synthase(s) by U2 transcripts containing 5-fluorouridine. Such inhibition of ⌿ synthases by RNA contai...