Introduction In this study we tested the hypothesis that fascicular constrictions (FCs) of the median nerve proximal to the elbow joint characterize anterior interosseous nerve syndrome (AINS). Methods Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) and ultrasound (US) examinations were evaluated in 45 patients with clinically suspected AINS. All 22 patients at site 1 underwent MRN and 8 underwent US; all 23 patients at site 2 underwent US. Results Median nerve FCs were identified in all MRN cases; FCs and/or fascicular enlargements were identified in 88% of US cases. Most FCs were in the mediannerve posterior/posteromedial region and were proximal to the elbow joint line (mean distance: MRN, 5.4 cm; US, 7.5 cm), with the exception of a single FC (located 1 cm distal). No extrinsic compression of median or anterior interosseous nerves was identified in the arm or forearm. Discussion AINS is a noncompressive neuropathy characterized by median nerve FCs in the arm.

Various clinical tests are used to evaluate the palmaris longus tendon, but their accuracy is unknown. We assessed the accuracy of clinical tests (Schaeffer’s, Thompson’s, Mishra-I, Mishra-II) against ultrasound as the reference standard. We hypothesized that Schaeffer’s was most accurate and that examination can reliably assess the palmaris longus tendon’s length. Ninety-six wrists were examined clinically and evaluated with ultrasound by radiologists who were blinded to examination results. We calculated diagnostic accuracy and agreement between length measurements. Sensitivity values were as follows: Schaeffer’s 94%, Mishra-I 100%, Mishra-II 100%, Thompson’s 72%. Specificity values were as follows: Schaeffer’s 94%, Mishra-I 83%, Mishra-II 89%, Thompson’s 91%. Intraclass correlation coefficient between palmaris longus tendon length measurement on examination and ultrasound was 0.54. Schaeffer’s test accurately detected this tendon with >90% sensitivity and specificity, but clinical examination less reliably measured palmaris longus tendon length. Ultrasound may be a useful adjunct to assess potential graft length preoperatively. Level of evidence: I

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract