The brain is a functional unit made up of multi-level connected elements showing a pattern of synchronized activity that varies in different states. The wake-sleep cycle is a major variation of brain functional condition that is ultimately regulated by subcortical arousal- and sleep-promoting cell groups. We analyzed the evolution of functional MRI signal in the whole cortex and in a deep region including most sleep- and wake-regulating subcortical nuclei at loss of consciousness induced by the hypnotic agent propofol. Optimal data were obtained in 21 of the 30 healthy participants examined. A dynamic analysis of functional MRI time courses on a time-scale of seconds was conducted to characterize consciousness transition, and functional connectivity maps were generated to detail the anatomy of structures showing different dynamics. Inside the magnet, loss of consciousness was marked by the participants ceasing to move their hands. We observed activity synchronization after loss of consciousness within both the cerebral cortex and subcortical structures. However, the evolution of functional MRI signal was dissociated, showing a transient reduction of global cortico-subcortical coupling that was restored during the unconscious state. An exception to cortico-subcortical decoupling was a brain network related to self-awareness (i.e., the default mode network) that remained connected to subcortical brain structures. Propofol-induced unconsciousness is thus characterized by an initial, transitory dissociated synchronization at the largest scale of brain activity. Such cortico-subcortical decoupling and subsequent re-coupling may allow the brain to detach from waking activity and reorganize into a functionally distinct state.
Background
Dexmedetomidine is used as adjuvant in total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), but there have been few studies concerning its effect on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during cranial surgery. Our aim was to study the effect of dexmedetomidine on IONM in patients undergoing brain stem and supratentorial cranial surgery.
Methods
Two prospective, randomized, double‐blind substudies were conducted. In substudy 1, during TIVA with an infusion of propofol and remifentanil, 10 patients received saline solution (SS) (PR group) and another 10 (PRD group) received dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg/h). Total dosage of propofol and remifentanil, intensity, latency and amplitude of motor‐evoked potentials following transcranial electrical stimulation (tcMEPs) as well as somatosensory‐evoked potentials (SSEP) were recorded at baseline, 15, 30, 45 minutes, and at the end of surgery. In order to identify differences in the same patient after dexmedetomidine administration, we designed substudy 2 with 20 new patients randomized to two groups. After 30 minutes with TIVA, 10 patients received dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg/h) and 10 patients SS. The same variables were recorded.
Results
In substudy 1, propofol requirements were significantly lower (P = .004) and tcMEP intensity at the end of surgery was significantly higher in PRD group, but no statistically significant differences were observed for remifentanil requirements, SSEP and tcMEP latency or amplitude. In substudy 2, no differences in any of the variables were identified.
Conclusions
The administration of dexmedetomidine at a dosage of 0.5 mg/kg/h may reduce propofol requirements and adversely affect some neuromonitoring variables. However, it can be an alternative on IONM during cranial surgeries.
REDEX
EudraCT: 2014‐000962‐23
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.